to JMitch:
My reasons for thinking evolution is mostly false, are scientific in nature:
Even if evolution has some truth to it (i.e., simple cellular life, to simple organisms, to slightly more complex organisms, to fish, to birds...etc....), how does one "bridge the gap", scientifically speaking into thinking that inteligent, sentient beings as unbelievably complex as humans could emerge from this soup? The gap between Apes, Neanderthals etc.. and humans is IMMENSE.....Let's take a closer look:
It is a matter of paleontological fact that the fossil records in europe and africa show a distinct GAP between homo-erectus and homo-sapiens. The skull found at Broken Hill Zambia in 1921 was carted out as some kind of "link" in the evolutionary chain, while patently ignoring the fact that this skull was more Neanderthal than human..(large brow ridges, flat sloping forehead etc...)..and since it is already an assumed fact amongst paleontologists that Neanderthal did NOT evolve into Cro-Magnon man, the scientists have a real dilemna on their hands...they can;t fill the "GAP"
Secondly, we humans are unlike ANY other animal on earth, insomuch as we are OUTSIDE the evolutionary forces that supposedly "evolved' us. In fact, we are not just different, but QUANTITATIVELY different. Darwinism works fine on paper, but it is just impractical in the field.Darwin himself said this : "nature never over-endows a species beyond the demands of everyday survival"....okay, so how does our dim-witted friend Darwin explain the fact that Humans seem to have SO MUCH MORE THAN THEY NEED FOR SURVIVAL?....mentally, we are endowed with so many gifts to insure our own survival, that it seems like our own existence violates darwins own fundamental evolutionary principle?
We have opposable thumbs, and our feet bear no resemblance to our alleged simian ancestors. Also, we are basically far more savage than any other primate...there are exactly 312 distinctive physical traits that set us apart from our alleged simian ancestors (i won't list them....hehe)...
Most importantly, evolution cannot account for mankinds extraordinary intelligence, nor the lack of body hair. Evolution cannot explain why our sex organs are so different (no laughter or giggles here please....hehe)...Simply put, human males are the ONLY mammal on earth able to maintain an erection without the the use of a penis bone. If we eveloved from apes or monkeys or Neanderthals or whatever other kind of nonsense Darwin was spouting, why are our sex organs unlike our so-called ancestors?...and why are they unlike other current species roaming the earth today that are theorectically distantly related to us (monkeys, etc...)? Also, why are human-kind of differing colors?...how did that happen?....Brown, white, etc...It is a known fact that the only way to get extreme variety in a species is to DELIBERATELY breed them..(hence the variety of household pets.....they did not appear in nature....we sped up the process by breeding them, now we got a bunch of Great Danes running around...hehe)...we have too much variety to be accounted for in evolutionary theory.....
And one more thing: (just a minor aside) : Why do we humans have allergies?...does that make any sense to you at all? that we would be allergic to our own environs? ....sounds fishy to me......more later