I am not as sure about Hydrogen as Helium, my children have had helium balloons and I know they always rise and end up stuck to my ceiling.
Science already knows the magic of gravity
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
This is just getting more and more painful to watch.
Guess I'll try saying the obvious again: tc, you're not on to anything, your ideas have no merit. You've shown no will to learn or listen to what people more knowledgeable than you have to say.
Tell me, why should anyone listen to you?
Guess I'll try saying the obvious again: tc, you're not on to anything, your ideas have no merit. You've shown no will to learn or listen to what people more knowledgeable than you have to say.
Tell me, why should anyone listen to you?
I have explained myself time and time again, it is painful that nobody reads correctly , I know what buoyancy is, this is psuedo section, no proofs remember, hearsay, my ideas not present information we all know.
A helium childs balloon opposes a force on my ceiling, it is still rising, it is not floating on air when it is still rising.
And time and time again you've been proven wrong. Does any of this register?
So you have proved me wrong on something that does not exist yet, interesting but impossible.
I await DY's answer about gravitational effects on Helium.,
And Kristoffer - there is nothing to prove wrong in Psuedo science please stop wasting your time and look up the definition,
If you were serious about science you would try to look at the idea and try to advance the idea, to look at the possibilities,
Please stop wasting everyones time and learn some science. You'll never revolutionize anything and I'm certain no scientist will ever look at one of your ideas and shout "Eureka! This is what's been missing".
- The Sun contains many elements, at least 67, and is held together by gravity. It is about 71% Hydrogen, 27% Helium (by weight) versus 74% and 24% average for the Milky Way, so the sun is not preferentially shedding hydrogen and helium for the past 4.6 billion years.
- Jupiter's upper atmosphere is about 23.4% Helium by weight. Based on the laws of chemistry and physics it is believed that is lower than 24% because helium rain might be falling.
- Liquid helium can be transported in a container open at the top, like other liquids.
Your criteria is vague and irrelevant. Humans don't change the laws of the universe by "interference" so any involvement does not alter the strength of the rebuttal.
And learn some science, again presumptions and flaming.
Stop it, look up Psuedo definition, it is you in the wrong section, science is up the main forum page towards the top.
The idea of Psuedo is so amateurs can express their ideas without having to justify their limited knowledge,
A scientist with true knowledge may just click onto something, the poster understands enough to have the idea, but could never advance on the idea or look at the idea in great depth knowing all the maths.
Wrong. A moderator already told you this was wrong.
Science has several POSSIBLE answers for the mechanism of gravity - the reason there is no set answer is because we haven't found a way to adequately prove/disprove any of the possible theories yet.
What you are spouting aren't theories... they are not grounded in good science in any manner of the word.
Call me curious, you have just give me detailed results for Helium and Hydrogen on the Sun, now call me stupid if you want to, but I am certain Humanity as never travelled to the Sun to get a sample of what is contained.
Neither is the Sun the same substance has the Earth or the same ? has the ground and mantle of the earth but close to being the same has the earths core.
Now I said no interference of humanity, this is about the Sun is pure guess work for sure?
What do you think a ballon full of air would do in a room filled with CO2 gas? Would it rise, would it sink or would it not move?
I cant use maths to show my content clearer. This is psuedo science, you are changing the definition just for me, I do not see any other people on this forum having misuse of definitions applied to them.
Like I said I know you all want me banned, it is more than obvious you are all pushing for ban and warning points.
Pretty unreal and unfair.
I asked dy for a answer, put science on the spot again, so it resorts back to deflection to me away from the answer I asked for.
EVERYTHING with mass is affected by gravity (it's affected, not effected)... and I mean everything. Even LIGHT is affected by intense gravity (why do you think Black Holes are black?)
Helium floats because it is buoyant in Earths atmosphere... it's exactly the same principle as why a boat floats!
Answer to what? And if we "wanted you banned", you would be banned... we don't WANT to ban anybody, there are some that, unfortunately, we have to for the greater good.
No idea to be honest, my argument is helium at the moment.
I know what Buoyancy is , I know helium is said to float on the denser gases, I know the present thoughts on this.
I think black holes are simply the absence of light.
I think my tongue-in-cheek answer will make as much sense as tc's will.
Here goes: Why would the balloon be in a room filled with CO2? Is it suicidal?
I got it.
Does the Helium sink in a C02 filled room?
More energy loss than gain,
More energy loss than gain,
How much energy do I need to lift a 1 kg mass with a weight of 9.81n?