Uh, that's a MARKETING (i.e. totally made up piece of crap) term.
F*ck all to do with science.
Science already knows the magic of gravity
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
F*ck all to do with science.
You asked what critical balancing was, I showed you, when energy is added to the balloon it becomes critically unbalanced to gravity and rises.
Sorry but...
You realize that "critical balancing" is NOT a term... right? They are referring to that kit (a balancing kit) as being "critical" to fishing for carp...
which... again
Not quite, mass has energy, energy that is always a positive and minus state, but the two combined make an opposing and attractive force. that is equal unless becoming offset.
I thought that was in English.
(a) and (b) have an equilibrium in an object.
when either (a) or (b) becomes offset from the equilibrium that is direction to gravity or opposed to gravity.
And I pointed that "critical balancing" is:
A) not science, and
B) made up crap.
There is no such thing.
No.
As Billvon pointed out : If you had a rigid envelope for your balloon, and you heated the air inside and did not allow it to expand, it would not float.
Can you explain why you think air behaves differently than metal when heated?
Can you, as previously asked, explain What, in your opinion, is wrong with the current scientific explanation?
Ask any good Carp angler what critical balancing a bait means, it is a critical balance that allows acceleration of the bait to slow down in the water and exert less force on the lake bed, so the bait does not dig into the silt or weed bed.Sorry but...
You realize that "critical balancing" is NOT a term... right? They are referring to that kit (a balancing kit) as being "critical" to fishing for carp...
which... again
A changing of mass by boring out the center of the bait and added a less dense piece of foam to compensate for the mass of the remaining bait.
Not bs true .
acceleration of the bait to slow down in the water...
what?
It sounds, to me, like you are referring to Buoyancy... not Balance...
Except that your explanation is BS.
"Critical balancing" is NOT a scientific term.
In fact, as explained, it's not even balancing.
''If you had a rigid envelope for your balloon, and you heated the air inside and did not allow it to expand, it would not float.
Can you explain why you think air behaves differently than metal when heated?
Can you, as previously asked, explain What, in your opinion, is wrong with the current scientific explanation?''
Current explanation of the gravity mechanism is thought about gravitons, if that were true then the graviton would have to be a plus and negative,
Air and metal, something to do with exchange rates by thermodynamics and densities.
I am tiring out now sorry.
Nothing whatsoever to do with what's under discussion.
Why do you think this?
What evidence is there for this conclusion?
In other you haven't got a clue and are resorting to bullshit.
I note that you haven't bothered AT ALL to adress a number of questions and points raised.
It a balancing of the buoyancy in your terms, if I drop a dead weight in the water it will sink under the force of gravity, the water slows down the rate of descent by density and by also the water having gravity effect on the sinking object slowing down the objects descent by horizontal gravitational force of the water,
Bullshit from start to finish.
It 9 am Dy, I am tired , I have been on this most of the day again, I will retire now for the evening, and answer them all in the morning with a fresh head.
Doesn't matter when you answer them.
I doubt they'll be answered accurately or without more made up crap and gross ignorance.
Oh, and it's 9 PM.
Do you understand how buoyancy works?
And half an hour later he's STILL here.
But not replying to questions ...
Gases obey the ideal gas law fairly closely when heated. Metal does not. Therefore they behave differently.
No, it wouldn't have to be a plus and a negative.