Science already knows the magic of gravity
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
This is drivel.
Your "diagram" is meaningless.
(And it's also not any sort of response to my "electrical question").
Stars make atoms, atoms originated from the hydrogen atom that originated from the battle of matter v anti - matter in the first few seconds of the big bang.
Hydrogen then formed helium, gases that started the stars that then started a Proton-proton chain that then started to spit out particles that eventually formed the earth and in essence us.
Density means more force. 2 atoms , then 3 atoms, then 400, then 100, and so on.
Well thats what I was getting at, two opposing electrical forces will repel each other, the diagrams are accurate Physics with the exception of the missing neutrons,
I think I may just have worked out how and why the planets are made, and how they got their orbits around the sun.
another day though for that one.
another day though for that one.
The diagrams are NOT accurate.
They're not even close to accurate.
are you trying to suggest an electron is not attracted to a Proton and vice versus?
The only possible Physics is my diagram.
What is the white stuff between atoms called?
I'm pretty sure astroscience already has that one figured out.
I mean the real reason, the true version, it just came to me has we were speaking, the big bang stands and I think I can explain why we are centralised and why there is expanding matter, but anther time for that one.
Oh that would be interesting.
Especially in view of the fact that we are NOT "centralised".
Well either way I can explain why the dust particles rotated the sun,
You know the cannon ball explanation and how the cannon ball curves back down to earth without enough speed to travel straight.
The Sun spat out particles that were angled and not straight , the particles got caught in the suns own gravity and wrapped themselves in orbit instead of leaving to eventually form the planets.
edit to first form small stars that didnt make the grade.
Uh, yes.
It's called gravity.
And it's common knowledge.
In fact you've participated in threads on this forum that discuss gravity causing orbits.
Oh, and your diagram is utter (and incorrect) crap.
(As is, so far as I can [1] the attached equations).
1 Since you haven't specified what the symbols mean then it's hard to make out what they're (supposedly) saying.
Was just representing the curve with the diagram, sorry was rather tired I should of said and put google provided. also.
Ignore the maths ont he diagram I was not proving maths.
So you don't realize it is a joke?!
THE DIAGRAM IS WRONG.
