Before reading this post, read Saint Trick.
Can someone tell me how the belief in Santa is different from the belief in the Christian God? To me, an ex-Christian, I see no difference between how the belief are formulated and how/why they are defended. Allow me to elaborate:
Here is the "evidence" for the existence of Santa. Since Victor "wants to believe" in Santa, he is obviously going to find ways to defend/justify his belief. Perhaps he really did hear something on the roof, but it was his desire for proof that lead him to conclude that the sound on the roof must have been Santa. Had he not really cared about Santa's existence, he would have probably said "hmm, I hear something on the roof, I wonder what it could be. Here are some possible explanations." But no, his belief in Santa is so strong that he accepts, without question, that the noise must have been Santa, and therefore no other possible explanation is satisfactory/necessary. I trust you see what I'm getting at here. Basically all you need to do is replace the words "Santa" with "God" and "Victor" with "theists."
When one looks at the consequences of such an extraordinary belief (Santa or God), one can see that perhaps the original claim is not plausible. However, we tend to ignore the consequences of beliefs that provide us with the quickest & easiest answer to a question.
There is no way Santa is capable of the feats that he is characterized by, therefore, Santa's existence "wouldn't be possible." Likewise, contradictions/inconsistencies found in Christian doctrine lead us to believe that perhaps the claim that God exists is false. However, some say that God is beyond our comprehension, that he finds a way. Then are we justified in saying that Santa can find a way? We can't find anyway to explain how Santa could get his job done, so we conclude that he doesn't exist. Yet theists claim that even though we can't understand God, he must exist. My question is how are you justified in concluding this?
Maybe theists don't want to conclude otherwise, for the same reasons kids don't want to believe Santa doesn't exist:
Kids don't want to face the reality that Santa doesn't exist, simply because it makes them unhappy. Is it possible that this same fear of unhappiness is what prevents theists from admitting, or even seriously considering, that God may not exist?
Exactly. Only instead of giving up a trivial belief that will have no major impact on a person's life (giving up the belief in Santa), giving up the belief in God will have enormous everyday implications, shaking the very foundation of your life. This is understandably why a lot of theists will excert so much effort defending their beliefs rather than looking objectively at them. Any theist who is not prepared to possibly have all their beliefs dismantled is not ready to debate about God. Just to be fair, I should point out that any atheist who is not prepared to possibly have to accept the conclusion that God exists is similarily unprepared to debate over God's existence.
Just what I thought when I started reading the article .
BTW, don't feel that I'm advocating atheism, I'm just challenging theism . Let's try and keep your ideas about how "Godless" I am out of this, and consider the presented material exclusively.
Lastly, I wish everyone a Merry Xmas! :m:
(That's supposed to look like a Christmas Tree!)
Can someone tell me how the belief in Santa is different from the belief in the Christian God? To me, an ex-Christian, I see no difference between how the belief are formulated and how/why they are defended. Allow me to elaborate:
But Wendy's younger brother, Victor, is still a believer. "Wendy fakes it a bit for Victor's sake, but he seems to know that she doesn't really believe in Santa," Moniuk explains. "He keeps trying to convince her. He'll say that he heard reindeer hooves on the roof Christmas Eve, or point out the gifts he's gotten from Santa." Moniuk says she thinks Santa is important to Victor. "He wants to believe.
Here is the "evidence" for the existence of Santa. Since Victor "wants to believe" in Santa, he is obviously going to find ways to defend/justify his belief. Perhaps he really did hear something on the roof, but it was his desire for proof that lead him to conclude that the sound on the roof must have been Santa. Had he not really cared about Santa's existence, he would have probably said "hmm, I hear something on the roof, I wonder what it could be. Here are some possible explanations." But no, his belief in Santa is so strong that he accepts, without question, that the noise must have been Santa, and therefore no other possible explanation is satisfactory/necessary. I trust you see what I'm getting at here. Basically all you need to do is replace the words "Santa" with "God" and "Victor" with "theists."
Last year, when Wendy was eight, she said to her mother, "It just can't be done, Mom. Santa doesn't make sense - it wouldn't be possible for him to deliver all those presents."
When one looks at the consequences of such an extraordinary belief (Santa or God), one can see that perhaps the original claim is not plausible. However, we tend to ignore the consequences of beliefs that provide us with the quickest & easiest answer to a question.
There is no way Santa is capable of the feats that he is characterized by, therefore, Santa's existence "wouldn't be possible." Likewise, contradictions/inconsistencies found in Christian doctrine lead us to believe that perhaps the claim that God exists is false. However, some say that God is beyond our comprehension, that he finds a way. Then are we justified in saying that Santa can find a way? We can't find anyway to explain how Santa could get his job done, so we conclude that he doesn't exist. Yet theists claim that even though we can't understand God, he must exist. My question is how are you justified in concluding this?
Maybe theists don't want to conclude otherwise, for the same reasons kids don't want to believe Santa doesn't exist:
"Wendy was a little annoyed that she had been tricked all these years,"
"He wants to believe. We were at a party where another child said that the tooth fairy wasn't real, and I could see how worried Victor was. He was almost in a crisis over it - if my parents were lying about the tooth fairy, what else could they be lying about?"
To everyone's surprise, she was furious with my parents for deceiving her
Kids don't want to face the reality that Santa doesn't exist, simply because it makes them unhappy. Is it possible that this same fear of unhappiness is what prevents theists from admitting, or even seriously considering, that God may not exist?
...it can be hard to give up that little piece of Christmas magic.
Exactly. Only instead of giving up a trivial belief that will have no major impact on a person's life (giving up the belief in Santa), giving up the belief in God will have enormous everyday implications, shaking the very foundation of your life. This is understandably why a lot of theists will excert so much effort defending their beliefs rather than looking objectively at them. Any theist who is not prepared to possibly have all their beliefs dismantled is not ready to debate about God. Just to be fair, I should point out that any atheist who is not prepared to possibly have to accept the conclusion that God exists is similarily unprepared to debate over God's existence.
This, I think, is a more acceptable line of thought: no deceiving, no extraordinary claims. For these kids, the true excitement of Christmas is still present, but the "supernatural" component serves as an allegory rather than as a literal truth. It is only the literal interpretation regarding Santa that seems absurd and is false. Likewise, not believing in God does not take away from the holiness of life, it doesn't necessarily make it anything less. An atheist can love life just as much as a theist can. And while the literal interpretation of Christianity may not be true, the teachings can serve as somewhat useful allegories that aid in finding personal meaning to life. Yet these allegories are not indicators of absolute truth.When I had my own children, I thought back to my sister's intense reaction and decided that I would tell my kids the truth, right from the start. Yes, we talked about Santa at Christmas time but I made it clear that this was just a story; we were just pretending that St. Nick came to our home to give us presents. As they got older, I talked to my kids about how each of us could be Santa when we gave something to another person - and how the man in the red suit is just a symbol for this spirit of giving.
Just what I thought when I started reading the article .
BTW, don't feel that I'm advocating atheism, I'm just challenging theism . Let's try and keep your ideas about how "Godless" I am out of this, and consider the presented material exclusively.
Lastly, I wish everyone a Merry Xmas! :m:
(That's supposed to look like a Christmas Tree!)