S.a.m.

Status
Not open for further replies.
James R said:
To pjdude and CheskiChips:

This thread is about SAM. The spat between the two of you stops here.

To any others who wish to complain about other posters being banned or not being banned, please take it to a different thread.
Click to expand...

so comparing the treatment of Sam to others is not allowed?




not to mention the blatent hypocrisy of banning SAM for libel while ignoring it in others. The blind eye you turned to Electrics libeling of me for instance.
 
Lucysnow said:
Exactly. She's divisive so we all spend more time arguing about SAM, dealing with SAM etc. Its not quite what you want in a forum. She's like a fly in the soup.
Click to expand...

It has more to do with the fact that treatment and attitudes toward her expose the inconsestancies within the actions of forum members and mods than merely about her.
 
Lucysnow said:
...She's divisive so we all spend more time arguing about SAM, dealing with SAM etc.
Its not quite what you want in a forum. She's like a fly in the soup.
Click to expand...

Hay... YOU'R soop has a fly in it... others wish to partake... but i guess you didnt get the memo:::

SAM is baned... she ant here.!!!

An yet... you still cant stop talkin about SAM... ie... you'r itch still ant scratched... an the only thang that coud do that is if you coud "get-SAMs-goat" by out-witin her in a discusson... so you see... Lucy... pushin for a SAM perma-ban is cuttin off you'r noise to spite you'r face... ie... be carful what you wish for.!!!

Randwolf said:
You mean the part where I asked questions that you prefer not to respond to? So easy to write them off as "mis-understandings" and then "snipe" them... :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Whats been said is for all to see... its oK wit me that you see it the way you do :cool:
 
cluelusshusbund said:
Hay... YOU'R soop has a fly in it... others wish to partake... but i guess you didnt get the memo:::

SAM is baned... she ant here.!!!

An yet... you still cant stop talkin about SAM... ie... you'r itch still ant scratched... an the only thang that coud do that is if you coud "get-SAMs-goat" by out-witin her in a discusson... so you see... Lucy... pushin for a SAM perma-ban is cuttin off you'r noise to spite you'r face... ie... be carful what you wish for.!!!



Whats been said is for all to see... its oK wit me that you see it the way you do :cool:
Click to expand...

I know she's banned:rolleyes:

Go back and read my post and then go back and read all your contributions to the 'sam' issue. I simply said she's divisive and it leads to...well threads like this one.
:spank:

I don't think your wife spanks you enough.
 
Lucysnow said:
...I simply said she's divisive and it leads to...well threads like this one.
Click to expand...

I thank its good that people freely espress therselfs "in threds like this"... mayb help clear the air which can lead to beter relatonships in the future :shrug:

:spank:

I don't think your wife spanks you enough.
Click to expand...

Wanna be my frind:)
 
Lack of good quality spanking is what got S.A.M. into this mess in the first place. I say spanking should be mandatory at schools and in the workplace by trained professionals. It feels good, releases endorphins, and releases stress. OK who's first?
 
Enmos said:
That must refer to the spanker, rather than to the spankee. Right? lol
Click to expand...

Spankee! And the spanker gets to release HIS stress. OMG what a mutually-beneficial activity!

I gotta organize a spanking circle through craigslist or something.
 
Bells said:
Where is it?

Because I have read through all the posts and have yet to see a link from you.

Seriously dude, what the...?

*Sigh*

What has become of this forum..:bawl:
Click to expand...

post 103# in this thread second quote box


do you have a point or do you think libel is a good thing?
 
^ I'd like to see the original post.

Lucysnow said:
Exactly. She's divisive so we all spend more time arguing about SAM, dealing with SAM etc. Its not quite what you want in a forum. She's like a fly in the soup.
Click to expand...

Meh. Personally, I think people here are over analysing her case, and with this lose perspective. They should get it over with. S.A.M. has been one of the most frequented topics in this forum. There's not one month without a thread being made about S.A.M., or even topics that are not about S.A.M. end up being about S.A.M.
Kind of sad. People should find a new hobby.
 
Last edited:
pjdude, I'm still having a hard time finding any relation between your original claim, and the 'evidence' you've posted.

Lets see, that's your original claim:

pjdude1219 said:
the funny thing is while merely question that the current narrative that supports the pro jewish/Israeli point of view gets banned while people like **otheadp and cheski get to call all arabs and muslims murderers, baby killers, evil, and unreasionally hateful and you get cat warned for abusing the report function for reporting them and they don't get touched. occasionally I have seen someone get nailed for it ussually on the end of debate of how the mods treat comments against jews/Israel and how they treat Islam/abab/arab countries.
Click to expand...


Then people ask you to support your claim, and in response to that you post the following:
pjdude1219 said:
“
Originally Posted by ElectricFetus
Well pjdude1219 please show us a quote of Cheski or otheadp saying "all arabs and muslims" are "murderers"
”
Click to expand...
**“
You keep extending a broad and generous benefit of the doubt to coldblooded hunters and baby killers,
”
Click to expand...
in regards to palestinains. hell if you want I kind find you making the same kind of statements your not much different than them.
Click to expand...


Now, my question is, HOW does this support your original claim which goes as following: **"..otheadp and cheski get to call all arabs and muslims murderers, baby killers, evil,..."

I'm sorry, but it looks like your original claim about otheadp and cheski are nothing but unsubstantiated assertions.
__________

** put the relevant parts in bold
 
PsychoTropicPuppy said:
Now, my question is, HOW does this support your [pjdude1219's] original claim which goes as following: **"..otheadp and cheski get to call all arabs and muslims murderers, baby killers, evil,..."

I'm sorry, but it looks like your original claim about otheadp and cheski are nothing but unsubstantiated assertions.
__________

** put the relevant parts in bold
Click to expand...

He should apologize within 24 hours or be permabanned, provided a 2/3 majority of mods support this. If not, then he should be banned for a month.

I've asked him many times to prove his bullcrap lies, and he hasn't. His offense is identical to SAM's, and he should get EXACTLY the same treatment. Mods, fucken do something about this. I reported his crap to you enough times and got no response. WTF is this:confused:
 
PsychoTropicPuppy said:
pjdude, I'm still having a hard time finding any relation between your original claim, and the 'evidence' you've posted.

Lets see, that's your original claim:




Then people ask you to support your claim, and in response to that you post the following:



Now, my question is, HOW does this support your original claim which goes as following: **"..otheadp and cheski get to call all arabs and muslims murderers, baby killers, evil,..."
I'm sorry, but it looks like your original claim about otheadp and cheski are nothing but unsubstantiated assertions.
__________

** put the relevant parts in bold
Click to expand...
did you go and look up the posts I told you too. Context. When some says when your defending an entire group of people that they are murderers and baby killers they are calling everyone your defending baby killers and murderers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top