The real Russian problem is centered on Hillary. If the Russians are being accused of hacking everyone, around the world, then it follows that Hillary's private server may have been hacked and sensitive information compromised. Is it a coincidence, that the Russians were able to stay one step ahead of the Obama Administration in terms of its expansion policies? Did the Russians know in advance, through Hillary's server, high level US diplomatic strategy? Trump's election spoiled it for the Russians. They had Hillary by the short hairs.
Well here is the problem with that Wellwisher, per the testimony of FBI Director Comey under oath before Congress, there is no evidence Hillary’s server was ever hacked by Russians or anyone else for that matter. Two, there is no evidence Russia has hacked every server on the planet. They aren’t that good.
What does your alleged hacking of Hillary’s server have to do with staying one step ahead of anything? Hillary was in charge of the State Department, not the CIA. You do understand the difference between the CIA and the State Department?
How did Trump’s election spoil anything for Russia? Please do be specific? And what “short hairs” did Russia have on Clinton. Please do be specific.
The fact is with the election of Trump, Russia may have purchased an American president. The men around him, e.g. Flynn, Page, Sessions, others and Trump himself have been compromised by Russia.
Consider this scenario. Bill and Hillary had a Foundation, which made them rich, while also doing a lot of good charity work. Hillary did not divest herself, like expected of Trump. She was Secretary of State and a Trustee at the same time. She was mixing company business with private business, since her position, as Secretary of State, was very useful to both purposes. This was a way to be efficient with her time, with it all legal. She did not what her private dealings, on public record, since anything on a government server is open to scrutiny, by the freedom of information act. She decided to use a private server so she could control the information.
Well for starters, Bill and Hillary created a charitable foundation, and it didn’t make them rich. They became wealthy by writing books and doing speaking engagements as their predecessors have done.
Here is the thing Wellwisher, here is the thing, unlike your man Trump, Hillary and Bill never profited from the Clinton Foundation. She never used the charitable foundation she created to fund her lifestyle or business interests as your man Trump did.
As for her use of a private email server, she did what her predecessors did. Her predecessors used private email servers for government business too. But the funny thing is you have no problems with Hillary’s predecessors using private email servers for public business because her predecessors were Republicans. Your hypocrisy here is “yuge”.
The problem with this arrangement, even if innocent, legal, and done by the book, is you have a former president and his wife, who is Secretary of State, meeting with world leaders and large cooperate organizations for both the foundation and government, all corresponding via a private server.
Hmm…It was done by the book. Oops.
It is not hard to add spyware, to an e-mail attachment. If the incoming e-mail was expected, from someone who is offering a donation to the foundation or a speaking fee, the e-mail will be gladly opened. Bill gave speeches to Russian interests, which was not illegal. But the question is, did the KGB attached spyware to these e-mail correspondences. They will be opened, since it was good for business and expected.
It is possible, the Russian did not know she was using her private server for Government business. Who would do that? Rather they may have assumed she only using that server for her business dealings. When they entered the server, they struck silver and gold. Being in Hillary server, could also explain why they could enter the DNC server so easily. They could send an e-mail, that would look innocent with the correct routing addresses, so it was opened.
My guess is the Wikileaks information about Hillary, was not supplied by the Russians, but by the CIA. The reason was the CIA figured out that the Russian had compromised Hillary's Server, and they needed to take her out, delicately, so she not become a Russian puppet president. They also could not go public, since there was a lot of sensitive information that would impact other people, including the White House, who were unknowing victims, but who also were showing signs of corruption, that is normally concealed.
Trump is a distraction to keep the audience looking, over there, so the magicians can perform their disappearing trick.
The problem is you have no evidence to support any of your conspiracy theories: a) that Clinton’s email server was hacked by anyone much less the Russians, b) the previous Democratic White House was in any way corrupt, c) that Bill Clinton was in anyway corrupt, giving a speech for normal and customary fees, isn’t evidence of corruption. Bill Clinton gave one speech to a Russian investment bank. That’s singular, not plural as you asserted.
Furthermore, you have no evidence that the material released by Russia through Wikileaks was from the CIA. American intelligence agencies, including the recently appointed Republican CIA director, have definitively stated the material came from Russia. As with most everything with you Wellwisher, your beliefs and conspiracies are just not consistent with known facts.