Earlier on, I posted this on the topic of religiously motivated violence:
and
It is difficult to accept the first set, and reasonable to accept the second set.
However, there is a very practical level at which religious people get away with lowly actions, even violence: domestic issues, issues of bullying among school children, bullying among coworkers, in the neighborhood.
Religious people get to bully others in the name of religion, and get away with it because religiousness is protected by the secular (!!) law, and non-religiousness is not protected.
It's not that violence is religiously motivated.
It's that religiousness is supposed to be respected as such.
By mandating respect for religiousness, the secular government is giving religious people more power and more rights than they deserve.
Some ways to understand violence to be motivated by religion:
1. The violence is perpetrated by people who claim to be religious.
2. The claims of the perpetrators are to be taken at face value and to be held as a standard of religion.
3. Religion is what any person who claims to be religious says religion is.
4. Some religious scriptures instruct the persecution of non-believers. The people who claim to be the heirs of said scriptures, are indeed divinely ordained heirs of said scriptures. Whatever these people do, is sanctioned by the scriptures and God.
5. A person who claims to be religious, has no political or economical interests.
6. People make no mistakes.
- And therefore, any violence committed by a person who claims to be religious, is violence motivated by religion.
and
Some ways to understand how violence is not motivated by religion:
1. Simply claiming to be religious does not make a person religious.
Asserting religious identity does not necessarily equal genuine religious identity.
Every religion has as part of its doctrines warnings about asserting religious identity lightly.
2. There is a gradation of religious advancement within every religion.
From practitioners who are at the beginning levels and who still manifest mainly mundane acting and reasoning, to practitioners who are much less mundane.
3. Religion is what the topmost authorities within a religion claim religion to be.
4. Religious scriptures give various instructions. While any practitioner may attempt to carry them out, not every practitioner is equally competent to carry out those instructions adequately.
5. All people have political and economical interests. It is inevitable that in order to survive, they satisfy those interests somehow.
6. People make mistakes. Sometimes, they even repent for them.
- And therefore, any violence committed by a person who claims to be religious, is not necessarily violence motivated by religion.
It is difficult to accept the first set, and reasonable to accept the second set.
However, there is a very practical level at which religious people get away with lowly actions, even violence: domestic issues, issues of bullying among school children, bullying among coworkers, in the neighborhood.
Religious people get to bully others in the name of religion, and get away with it because religiousness is protected by the secular (!!) law, and non-religiousness is not protected.
It's not that violence is religiously motivated.
It's that religiousness is supposed to be respected as such.
By mandating respect for religiousness, the secular government is giving religious people more power and more rights than they deserve.