Revised "Homosexual laws?" thread

Asguard

Kiss my dark side
Valued Senior Member
Reference: http://www.sciforums.com/showthread...2196#post242196

This is the RELIGION thread

for people wishing to debate the ethics of the issue try here: http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=16129

For those who cant be bothered going through the old thread here is the issue



by Lady Homosexual laws

What are your thoughts on the proposed laws of the homosexual community?


Landlords will be required to accept homosexuals as tenants (already the law in some places).
* State laws against sodomy and other unnatural acts will be overturned.
* Private organizations such as the Boy Scouts will be required to accept a gay scoutmaster.
* Employers will not be allowed to reject applicants because they are gay.1
* Public media will be either prevented or pressured not to broadcast or to print even Bible declarations against sexual perversions--no freedom of speech on this issue.
* Companies will be required to extend marital benefits to employees who live in a same-sex relationship.2
* States might be required to legitimize same sex marriages.
* One who openly upholds biblical truth on these issues will be subject to discrimination.3
* Schools will be required to encourage acceptance of sexual diversity and parental guidance in these matters will be ignored.
* Churches will lose their tax-free status and become subject to lawsuits when they reject or discipline practicing homosexuals.


excerpts by David R. Pharr

Lady for you a note

i would ask you to please REFERENCE this quote so that everyone can read it for themselves and deside on the authentisty ect

there you go cris, im sorry for dumping this on you guys but you asked

feel free to edit this post as you see fit
 
Religions tend to have strong views on this issue.

I advocate a philosophy of -

People should be free to do anything they wish except where such actions would interfere with the freedom of others.

With this in mind I have no problem with how other people want to react to each other regarding sexual attitudes.

Why does religion have such an issue with this and seek to limit human freedom in this regard?
 
I'm curious as to the context of the aparent bible passage that condems homosexuality. there are lots of bible passages that really should be read in context and not just qouted. they can get misinterpreted. such as the whole thing about women not talking in church. that was written about a specific church because people were socializing and not worshiping.

and even if it were a sin, why so much concern over this one?
is being gay a worse sin than other options? is there something in the bible about that. Lying is sorta wrong but being gay is really wrong? I'm pretty sure there's not.
 
what bible?

who cares what the bible says anyways? most so-called christians i know don't even read it.

in fact, the bible is full all sorts of crap. here is an email i received one time, pretty funny:

Dr. Laura Schlessinger, a US radio personality who dispenses advice to people who call in to her radio show, said that as an observant Orthodox Jew, she holds homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22 and cannot be condoned in any circumstance. The following is an open letter to Dr. Laura penned by a US resident, which was posted on the Internet.

Dear Dr. Laura:

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the specifics (of Old Testament Law).

a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Lev. 1:9). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

b) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev. 15:19-24). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

e) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus
35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?

f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an
abomination (Lev. 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than
homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?


g) Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I
have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

h) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev.19:27. How should they die?

i) I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig
makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

j) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two
different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? (Lev.24:10-16)Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family ffair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 0:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.
 
ok on a religious level jeause preached tolerance and love of EVERYONE

so i would say that he would be for not discriminating based on sex, sexual preferance, race or age
 
Back
Top