Over the last few months it is easy to see the volume of this section has increased.
Many of the posts are often of contention. (one may claim, "the sky is blue", as the responses may come back either 'god did it' or 'No, its not, it's black with little white dots, half the time)
but how many on this site are looking for the quality aspects of the combining knowledge?
what are the reasons each here are on this section of Philosophy/Religion?
eg.... the thread on Quaker Creed, is unique in that it shares a belief system that professes growth, responsibility and that each are capable and should be involved with contributing to knowledge.
my point is, from religion to science, it seems their may exist a pretty fair frame of beliefs/observances and yet how many are of the intent to contribute 'good' information, rather than just conflicts that are pretty redundant and contentious
What is your intent on this section?
Many of the posts are often of contention. (one may claim, "the sky is blue", as the responses may come back either 'god did it' or 'No, its not, it's black with little white dots, half the time)
but how many on this site are looking for the quality aspects of the combining knowledge?
what are the reasons each here are on this section of Philosophy/Religion?
eg.... the thread on Quaker Creed, is unique in that it shares a belief system that professes growth, responsibility and that each are capable and should be involved with contributing to knowledge.
my point is, from religion to science, it seems their may exist a pretty fair frame of beliefs/observances and yet how many are of the intent to contribute 'good' information, rather than just conflicts that are pretty redundant and contentious
What is your intent on this section?