Ratio-Concepts of Mind-Matter Relationships With Speed if Thought

Reiku

Banned
Banned
1 year = $$app.60,000$$ thoughts
1 year = we have totally new bodies
1 year = we have totally new physical minds

What would it mean when we think of a physical mind? Does this not mean that whatever this projection of the inside world we perceive, is not in fact in regulations to a total value of mass? Wouldn’t that suggest that mind is not necessarily tied to matter, never mind energy?

And quite a few neurobiologists, quantum physicists have speculated the question of whether consciousness requires an energy or not, and the question so far cannot be answered, because there are too many theories that are, simply put, acceptable, from a scientific point of validity.

Let’s consider the energy, mass-body-mind relationships.

We have enough energy in the body to power a city for more than a day [A], and a material body [powered] to have unbounded abilities to create the internal dimension of the mind,

We use something like only $$5.6%$$ of the possible energy of what a human brain has when thought is concerned, such as IQ, and this is remedial next to the amount of energy our entire bodies contain, hence [A]. But Candice Pert, a Nuerobiologist gave evidence that our minds could very possibly be in every cell of our bodies, rather than being totally located to the brain itself (1). This in contrast, would mean that we may actually use all the energies contained in our bodies, but the brain takes only so much of it in, so we are now left with a limited amount of energy our thoughts can have (2).

This… may lead to many more quantum notion even more intriguing above ~

(1) – This was a theory I devised a week ago.
(2) – The body alone contains something like $$10^{26}$$ particles of mass.
 
IQ is found to be related to Brain Network

A review of 37 brain imagining studies have found overwhelming evidence to suggest that our very intelligence can be reduced down to neural networks*
Richard Haier of the University of California and Rex Jung, of the University of of New Mexico, have found that intelligence requires a syncronized relationship to several area’s of the brain, which have been able to compile a map of human intelligence.

*I would like it known, that this before has already been given a quantum answer, where the consciousness acts analogous to a ‘’pop’’ in the wave function upon a measurement, given by physicists (ADD).

Haier stated that ‘’our evidence suggests that the view that intelligence is not just a function of the pre-frontal vortex, but rather several systems, located not only at the front, but also the back of the brain itself, and depends heavily on the operation between these several location scattered throughout the brain are functioning, or better said, communicating with each other.
 
1 year = $$app.60,000$$ thoughts
At this rate I get 10.3 thoughts per hour rounded up and taking a waking 16 hours for each day of that year. In some ways I wish I thought that little, but your estimate seems way too low. I also think some effort must be put into what is considered a thought. There are the conscious, verbal thoughts we tend to focus on (and even identify with), but there are many other phenomnena that could be considered thoughts that head on a spectrum towards perceptions and include 'things' like mental images and feelings that can convey, to ourselves at least, a great deal of information.

Not to mention what happens in those other 8 hours: dreams.
 
At this rate I get 10.3 thoughts per hour rounded up and taking a waking 16 hours for each day of that year. In some ways I wish I thought that little, but your estimate seems way too low. I also think some effort must be put into what is considered a thought. There are the conscious, verbal thoughts we tend to focus on (and even identify with), but there are many other phenomnena that could be considered thoughts that head on a spectrum towards perceptions and include 'things' like mental images and feelings that can convey, to ourselves at least, a great deal of information.

Not to mention what happens in those other 8 hours: dreams.

True. Never seen it like this before.;)
 
Well I've reduced my thoughts to motion in that I now think in packets of information rather than actual words. This has led to a different mind set that doesn't come under your equation!
 
I asked Dr Wolf, what he thought of the assumptions abpve... he replied...

See my inserted responses below. I don't really have anything to add.

Best Wishes,

Fred Alan Wolf Ph.D.
Have Brains / Will Travel
San Francisco
mailto:fred@fredalanwolf.com
web page: http://www.fredalanwolf.com
Blog page: http://fredalanwolf.blogspot.com/

PS: Although my spamblocker says your continuing email is blocked, once I
have responded to your first email to me, I will continue to receive any
additional responses you wish to send. Please put Dr. Quantum in the
subject heading. You don't need to send a 2nd email to my spamblocker.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: GARETH [mailto:garethlee.meredith@tiscali.co.uk]
> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 10:15 PM
> To: fred alan wolf
> Subject: Dr Quantum
>
> Hello Doctor, I hope you are well.
>
> Take a read over this if you find any time... thanks... G.M
>
> ..............................................................
>
> 1 year = about 60,000 thoughts


Fred Alan Wolf: Who's counting?


> 1 year = we have totally new bodies


Fred Alan Wolf: Actually around 7 years to replace all cells.

> 1 year = we have totally new physical minds


Fred Alan Wolf: I would say we a constantly appearing new mind with old
memories.

>
> What would it mean when we think of a physical mind? Does
> this not mean that whatever this projection of the inside
> world we perceive, is not in fact in regulations to a total
> value of mass? Wouldn't that suggest that mind is not
> necessarily tied to matter, never mind energy?



Fred Alan Wolf: I would think so.

>
> And quite a few neurobiologists, quantum physicists have
> speculated the question of whether consciousness requires an
> energy or not, and the question so far cannot be answered,
> because there are too many theories that are, simply put,
> acceptable, from a scientific point of validity.


Fred Alan Wolf: If mind is the action of quantum wave function collapse,
then no energy. If mind is a physical agent then energy is needed.

>
> Let's consider the energy, mass-body-mind relationships.
>
> We have enough energy in the body to power a city for more
> than a day [A], and a material body [powered] to have
> unbounded abilities to create the internal dimension of the mind,

Fred Alan Wolf: Do you mean E=mc^2 energy liberated by annhilation of
around say 150 lbs?

>
> We use something like only 5.6% of the possible energy of
> what a human brain has when thought is concerned, such as IQ,
> and this is remedial next to the amount of energy our entire
> bodies contain, hence [A]. But Candice Pert, a Nuerobiologist
> gave evidence that our minds could very possibly be in every
> cell of our bodies, rather than being totally located to the
> brain itself (1). This in contrast, would mean that we may
> actually use all the energies contained in our bodies, but
> the brain takes only so much of it in, so we are now left
> with a limited amount of energy our thoughts can have (2).
>
> This. may lead to many more quantum notion even more
> intriguing above ~
>
> (1) - This was a theory I devised a week ago.
> (2) - The body alone contains something like 10^26 particles of mass.
>
>
>
> IQ is found to be related to Brain Network
>
> A review of 37 brain imagining studies have found
> overwhelming evidence to suggest that our very intelligence
> can be reduced down to neural networks* Richard Haier of the
> University of California and Rex Jung, of the University of
> of New Mexico, have found that intelligence requires a
> syncronized relationship to several area's of the brain,
> which have been able to compile a map of human intelligence.
>
> *I would like it known, that this before has already been
> given a quantum answer, where the consciousness acts
> analogous to a ''pop'' in the wave function upon a
> measurement, given by physicists (ADD).
>
> Haier stated that ''our evidence suggests that the view that
> intelligence is not just a function of the pre-frontal
> vortex, but rather several systems, located not only at the
> front, but also the back of the brain itself, and depends
> heavily on the operation between these several location
> scattered throughout the brain are functioning, or better
> said, communicating with each other.
 
My reasons outweighed the negative ones. There was more positivity out of staying, than what there has been leaving
 
ok.,fair enough.
why did u create a thread saying you were leaving in the first place?
 
Back
Top