I disagree. I will respond to YOUR evidence, when you take the time to refute mine. How does that sound? That sounds more fair to me?
I will respond to your nonsense so long as you actually go and read the link I gave you. Not just skim it; read it, understand it, digest it, think critically and come back to me with your honest assessment of it.
I can't help but notice you seem to be both claiming that there was no plane in Shanksville, whilst also claiming it was shot down in Shanksville?! So what is it to be? Was it shot down or was it miraculously hidden somewhere even though radar tracked it all the way to Shanksville?
If Flight 93 was shot down, we'd expect to see debris along the flight path BEFORE the impact crater, but this wasn't the case. As it happens debris was found in the direction the plane was heading, but never flew over. This is due to the angle the plane hit and the momentum of some debris continued forward at high velocity 900 feet or so.
The video claiming that wreckage was found miles away from the crash site doesn't sound very suspicious when you consider this was papers, clothing, insulation etc. This would have been carried there by the wind.
This also happened when Flight 427 crashed in a similar manner to that of Flight 93 and lightweight materials were found miles away from the impact site.
Lastly, what logical motive would the government have in staging a fake hijacking on this plane, and then for some bizzarre reason shooting it down and then try to cover-up the fact that they shot it down? If they shot the plane down, the military would be celebrated for doing so due to lives that would have been saved had it been allowed to reach its target.
This doesn't interest me at all. There is absolutely no corroborating evidence for this and I'm not going to take his word for it when there is more than enough evidence to show the hijackers crashed the plane themselves.
The crater was perfectly consistent with a nose-down high speed crash.
Please watch this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ff7h7Ll8Dl4
The crash site of PSA 1771 was just like that of flight 93.
What Popular Mechanics had to say about this Gibney:
Saying he was reluctant to fuel debate by responding to unsubstantiated charges, Gibney (a lieutenant colonel, not a major) declined to comment. According to Air National Guard spokesman Master Sgt. David Somdahl, Gibney flew an F-16 that morning--but nowhere near Shanksville. He took off from Fargo, N.D., and flew to Bozeman, Mont., to pick up Ed Jacoby Jr., the director of the New York State Emergency Management Office. Gibney then flew Jacoby from Montana to Albany, N.Y., so Jacoby could coordinate 17,000 rescue workers engaged in the state's response to 9/11. Jacoby confirms the day's events. "I was in Big Sky for an emergency managers meeting. Someone called to say an F-16 was landing in Bozeman. From there we flew to Albany." Jacoby is outraged by the claim that Gibney shot down Flight 93. "I summarily dismiss that because Lt. Col. Gibney was with me at that time. It disgusts me to see this because the public is being misled. More than anything else it disgusts me because it brings up fears. It brings up hopes--it brings up all sorts of feelings, not only to the victims' families but to all the individuals throughout the country, and the world for that matter. I get angry at the misinformation out there."
What Popular Mechanics has to say about fraudster Grand-Pre:
Sondahl says he is familiar with Grand-Pre's allegations. "I know he claims he knows our pilots, which is false. I know he claims he knows our adjustant general, which is false," he says. "I know everything he has claimed about Lieutenent Colonel Rick Gibney and the 119th Fighter Wing is complete crap."
General Shelton, who is now retired, also refutes Frand-Pre's claims. "I don't know this individual," Shelton tells Popular Mechanics. "The name doesn't ring a bell and I certainly never saw a report that he rendered alleging there was some type of conspiracy or that National Guard pilot shot down [Flight 93]." Shelton continues" I have a reputation for being candid, and I had seen a paper like that or heard a story like that, I would tell you, and I would tell you what I did with it. I never heard anything that was anything close to what he was saying. From my perspective, all that is hogwash."
Why was the plane that shot down Flight 93 not on Radar?
Why did the plane crash in one peice?
Why was no debris found BEFORE the impact point?
Why did the FDR show no signs of the plane being hit by a missle?
Why are passengers heard on phonecalls planning to raid the cockpit, then the commotion is heard on the CVR with the terrorists being heard crashing the plane?
These questions and dozens of other questions that I don't have time to list must be answered before I take an unnamed person for their word.