Race clashes hit Windsor

arkman said:
Whites enslaved Africans, killed most AI's, colonised the world, made every race feel inferior, set up an industrialised system which is destroying nature, started world wars, covet most of the worlds wealth, etc...etc.........and now they complain about a few burning buildings and some dead nuns!
Click to expand...

Yes; the Western objection to common murder, arson and wholesale societal oppression is indeed disheartening. If only we could be so open-minded as to look the other way in the face of hatred.

Then again, if the comparison is the relative humanitarianism of the West versus that of the islamic world regarding slavery and the like, why is it no one ever mentions the Arabic slave trade? And where did they all go? There don't seem to be any black Middle Easterners. Did something...well, unfortunate happen to them all? The stairs in Baghdad a little tricky last millenium, were they?

How odd.

Geoff
 
Ghost_007 said:
We weren’t all out to kill Salman Rushdie.

What is that supposed to mean? Show me where Muslim terrorists are walking free in any part of the World. Look at Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Syria, Iraq etc. Terrorists are being hunted down and eliminated.
Click to expand...

Well, Pakistan has, as I recall, set up a "no-look-no-see" zone on the border with Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia has a funny habit of being suspected of funding such people. Iran and Syria fund Hezbollah, of course.

Geoff
 
GeoffP said:
Well, Pakistan has, as I recall, set up a "no-look-no-see" zone on the border with Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia has a funny habit of being suspected of funding such people. Iran and Syria fund Hezbollah, of course.

Geoff
Click to expand...

A terrorist is someone that deliberately targets innocent people. If a person is fighting against an aggressor or occupier, doesn’t target anyone that isn’t fighting directly against them, then its kushti.

I disagree with Hezbollah targeting civilian areas with their missiles, that is what the Americans and Israelis do, it is against Islam to do such things. They maybe Shia but I was supporting them fully against the Israeli military monster, and hey, they won! :)
 
You may call them kushti, if you like, but ultimately they're fighting to impose 7th-century values on the world, which includes terror. And who, indeed, do these supposed kushti actually target?

How can you disagree with Hezbollah, yet support them, when they're deliberately targetting civilians, whereas US and Israeli strikes are trying to hit military targets? Then again, Hezbollah and Hamas consider all Israelis military targets.
 
samcdkey said:
Exactly how old are you?
Click to expand...

Old enough to know that you're a stuck up little wind up merchant who hasn't got a sense of humour.

Grow up and kick the condescending attitude, I can see straight through your tactics on this forum so much that it is embarrassing.
 
stu43t said:
Old enough to know that you're a stuck up little wind up merchant who hasn't got a sense of humour.

Grow up and kick the condescending attitude, I can see straight through your tactics on this forum so much that it is embarrassing.
Click to expand...

Boo hoo. Did liddle stewie get a boo boo?

Learn to debate with argument not opinions or wisecracks and you might actually learn something.
 
stu43t said:
Stupid girl - an argument is based on an opinion. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

No an argument is made up of refutations. It may reflect an opinion or a bias, but unless it provides information pertinent to the debate or question posed, it is merely rhetoric. And by opinion I meant personal opinions not related to the discussion at hand.

This is the definition I am referring to (as used in the context of a debate or discussion):

3. A discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal; "the argument over foreign aid goes on and on".
 
Last edited:
samcdkey said:
No an argument is made up of refutations. It may reflect an opinion or a bias, but unless it provides information pertinent to the debate or question posed, it is merely rhetoric. And by opinion I meant personal opinions not related to the discussion at hand.

This is the definition I am referring to (as used in the context of a debate or discussion):

3. A discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal; "the argument over foreign aid goes on and on".
Click to expand...



Shhh.

Got a great book that would interest you, its called "The Truth About Muhammad: Founder of the World's Most Intolerant Religion"

http://www.amazon.com/Truth-About-M...1/ref=pd_sxp_f_pt/102-8877429-4625750?ie=UTF8
 
samcdkey said:
Makes him feel important? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...


A rather silly answer to a straight forward question - ooops! I nearly forgot - you dont answer those kind of questions do you?



Wonder why he got the death threats - smacks of Salman Rushdie and Van Gogh.

BTW - Its an excellent book!
 
Last edited:
samcdkey said:
Learn to debate with argument not opinions or wisecracks and you might actually learn something.
Click to expand...

That's good advice, Sam ....when are you going to start following it? Go back and read some of your posts, Sam, and you'll see just what NOT to do.

Baron Max
 
Baron Max said:
That's good advice, Sam ....when are you going to start following it? Go back and read some of your posts, Sam, and you'll see just what NOT to do.

Baron Max
Click to expand...

I'm still waiting on the statistics on the "tremendous number" of drive by shootings in the US.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top