Athiests, even agnostics, nearly everyone it seems wants to prove this and prove that. If it was ever possible to "prove" God exists, would you believe and accept him then?
I can not think of any proof you might offer which would absolutely convince me of the existence of whatever god you might name.
Christianity isn't rocket science....it's much deeper than that.
Science is the endeavour of delving into the very nature of reality, the attempt to
understand all. There is no deeper than that. It is the ultimate purpose and reason. Well,
I like it at least. Religion is merely superstition which, unfortunately, rears its ugly head and gets in the way sometimes.
Why people insist in talking about their disbelief in God is beyond me.
Okay, think about it. Why am
I talking about it right now? Because
you raised the topic for discussion, obviously hpoing for a response. I'm being nice and responding. That is why.
But as I think about all the non-belief around us, and the ridicule that I often hear expressed about Christianity, it strikes me that even if a person has doubts about the authenticity of Jesus, it can do nothing but good to think about a character whose aim in life was to single-mindedly reflect the Love of God for the human race, and whose wish was:
"My joy may be in you, and that your joy may be complete".
John 15 -11
Indeed, it is a good thing to consider a character who tried to do good throughout his life. However, like other characters who tried to always do good, such as Winnie The Pooh and the Wombles, we must keep in mind that they are fictional.
It is so encouraging to believe that there is One who has our well-being at heart and who will do so much for us, if only we will let go of the controls and allow Him to do so.
It would be both encouraging and discouraging to me if such a god's existence was proven. On the one hand, it might be a slight comfort to know there is basically a safety net to existence. On the other hand, such a being's existence raises these problems:
- If everything is according to that being's plan, I have no free will.
- If that being is the motor force behind all events, he/she/it is an absolute bastard and should be tortured to death.
- If that being is omnipotent yet refuses to be involved, he/she/it is a pathetic bastard. Why? For watching 2,800 innocent people be smashed to death in New York. For letting tens of millions die in WW1. For the black death. For numerous other slaughters. Yes, this is in contradiction with the free will point. See why it poses a problem?