Don't bother, the underlying hope is hopeless.at the moment I am attempting to work out what 10 cubic meters of 350000 kPa air pressure provides in Joules...
but my math skills are hopeless.
Don't bother, the underlying hope is hopeless.at the moment I am attempting to work out what 10 cubic meters of 350000 kPa air pressure provides in Joules...
but my math skills are hopeless.
yes 7 pages dealing with people chasing a Perpetual energy claim that doesn't exist.Let's cut to the chase QQ. Seven pages.....
what idea was that exactly?But at rock bottom, what I wrote in #128/#134 is the inescapable fundamental prohibition against realizing your idea(s). Time to admit that, yes?
why not?Don't bother, the underlying hope is hopeless.
But that's exactly what your proposed scheme(s) claim. Whether you realize it or not. Sorry but I detect you have dug in hard so no point in further discussion. There are sites devoted to 'over unity' ideas including hydrostatic ones - just search for them.yes 7 pages dealing with people chasing Perpetual energy .claim that doesn't exist.
8 pages and counting....But that's exactly what your proposed scheme(s) claim. Whether you realize it or not. Sorry but I detect you have dug in hard so no point in further discussion. There are sites devoted to 'over unity' ideas including hydrostatic ones - just search for them.
Maybe I should put a message at the bottom that states:But that's exactly what your proposed scheme(s) claim. Whether you realize it or not.
Actually there is, albeit very small. Stick a straw in a glass of water and the water level inside the straw is higher than the mean. This is not a siphon function, but a capillary function, no?As others have pointed out, just stick say a plastic drinking straw in a glass of water. Obviously there is no siphon fountain to be had.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capillary_actionIt occurs because of intermolecular forces between the liquid and surrounding solid surfaces. If the diameter of the tube is sufficiently small, then the combination of surface tension (which is caused by cohesion within the liquid) and adhesive forces between the liquid and container wall act to propel the liquid
Listen: for the sub to blow its tanks it need to blast in a considerable amount of compressed air, in order to displace enough water to get its buoyancy to exceed its weight enough to lift it.I thought the air was about increasing displacement... which is primarily about over all size not weight. ( object fully submerged)
If the sub increases it's displacement (Size) it increases it's buoyancy
Just in case any reader is wondering about this, this does NOT produce a siphon.Actually there is, albeit very small. Stick a straw in a glass of water and the water level inside the straw is higher than the mean. This is not a siphon function, but a capillary function, no?
I believe the term is "capillary action" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capillary_action
absolutely... I agree.Listen: for the sub to blow its tanks it need to blast in a considerable amount of compressed air, in order to displace enough water to get its buoyancy to exceed its weight enough to lift it.
One litre of 10bar air requires about 2500Joules to compress it. This is quite a lot. Any many litres will be needed. See?
So any energy balance for the entire process MUST take account of the energy needed to compress the air the sub relies on to surface.
No......absolutely... I agree.
Do you have any ideas about how this pressure resource offered by deep oceans can be exploited?
https://www.wateriontechnologies.com/science.aspThe production of the Dioxytetrahydride Gas is created using relatively low energy heat in an electromagnetic process. The resulting gas is flammable and the only combustible by-product of this Gas reverts back to the lower energy state of liquid water.....more
Dave this is quite funny because you seem to be mixing me up with QQ.Of what??
What weighs 1kg and fills 1 litre? Water. Incompressible water.
Not gas. A litre of gas weighs considerably less than 1kg.
A half litre of gas with a half litre of steel? Steel will not compress. You now only have a half litre of storage.
You will find - not matter how you cut it - you can't do this without either putting energy into the system somewhere, or having zero net effect. (Just like perpetual motion machines - which also fail due to inviolable thermodynamics).
it is currently being exploited. The deep pressure is being used to maintain constant pressure in submerged bulk variable pressure storage systems. Only to maintain constant pressure not provide compressed air. That is done by a surface pump.No......
Obviously not, since, as everyone has been pointing out to you from the start, there is no pressure "resource" in the oceans. There is a pressure, but this is not stored energy and it is not a resource.absolutely... I agree.
Do you have any ideas about how this pressure resource offered by deep oceans can be exploited?
Nope. It is a proposal. Nothing has been built.it is currently being exploited. The deep pressure is being used to maintain constant pressure in submerged bulk variable pressure storage systems.
see wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed-air_energy_storage
Heading: Constant volume storage.
yeah you may be right on both counts...Nope. It is a proposal. Nothing has been built.
And you are referring to the wrong heading. This would be a constant pressure system, not a constant volume system.
Do you deny that sinking a variable volume vessel can pressurize air (Potential energy) that can be exported to the surface?Obviously not, since, as everyone has been pointing out to you from the start, there is no pressure "resource" in the oceans. There is a pressure, but this is not stored energy and it is not a resource.
Obviously not.Do you deny that sinking a variable volume vessel can pressurize air that can be exported to the surface?
so a hose attached to the Variable volume pressure vessel down at depth, with say 35000kPa of pressure inside it would not provide 35000Kpa at the surface?Obviously not.
What I deny - and this has now been said you five or six times, by at least four different people but seems not to have got through - is that you can do this without expending as much energy in the process as the energy you obtain.
So it is NOT a source of energy.