Originally posted by Persol
Basically it's trying to teach the population morals. Personally I'd rather not have the government (and politicians) responsible for that.
I like that line of thinking very much. It reminds me of a thing my brother always used to tell me when we were kids, and going to see a movie, he'd always get pissed off if the theater said we couldn't buy tickets to an R rated movie, and he'd always go on a long rant about being glad that the MPAA exists in order to dictate to us what our morals will be.
I tend to agree with you here, that the idea of making something like prostitution illegal is completely ridiculous. Yes it's VERY dangerous as far as illnesses and the like, but I guarantee you that that would be much less of a problem if it were legal through out America. What we'd have is not men soliciting sex from anonymous sleazy street walkers, but much more likely formal brothels, where the employers would likely enforce regular blood tests for their employees, and perhaps even cliental (possibly setting the grounds for a membership program, not unlike a gym. . . I think we all know how we would rather burn off those extra pounds, heh). Generally, banning something which doesn't harm the rights of another individual, and which can not be effectively enforced, all because of arbitrary moral objections, does nothing but create an inefficient business model, and ultimately a lot of pissed off people!
Hehe I like to think that this principal will be made VERY clear when I snap and start shooting people because gay marriages are outlawed, but then that's still just a pretty dream at the moment.