Mark 12:29, ""...The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; the Lord
our God is one Lord.".
my understanding of the trinity is that god is the union of divine three, the father, the son and the holy spirit (or ghost). that in itself is confusing enough. yet the Bible says in I Corinthians 14:33 that "... God is not the author of confusion...". fair enough.
parts of the Athanasian Creed do not really help: "...we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity... for there is one Person of the Father, another of the Son, another of the Holy Ghost is all one... they are not three gods,but one God... the whole three persons are co-eternal and co-equal...he therefore that will be save must thus think of the Trinity...".
now Athanasius was a bishop who supposedly formulated this doctrine. i am not claiming this as fact, but i am asking for clarifications.
baptism in the name of the father, and of the son, and of the holy ghost was never seen in Pauls letters in the early church. in fact Paul only baptized in the name of Jesus.
"the great commission" in the first written gospel, bears no mention of father/son/spirit , ref. Mark 16:15.
reference in the bible to a trinity can be found in the Epistle of I John 5:7, biblical scholars of today, however, have admitted that the phrase "...there are three that bear record in heaven, the father, the word, and the holy ghost: and these three are one" is definitely not found in any of today's
versions of the bible despite being in very older versions.
now as far as i read, Paul of Tarsus, the originator of christianity as we know it today formulated many doctrines but surprisingly the trinity was not one of them. Tertullian, a lawyer and presbyter of the third century Church in Carthage, was the first to use the word "Trinity".
in 325AD a council of about 300 bishops gathered for about 6 weeks in Nicea and formualted the doctrine of the trinity in todays understanding; father/son/spirit.
this happened after controversy on Pauls definition in 318 AD between arius the deacon and his bishop alexander. for political reasons (having a unified church), constantine, the emperor, ordered the council of 325AD.
and after much debate (to cut a long story short), in 451 AD, the council of chalcedon, with the blessing of the pope set the creed (trinity) as christian law. debate on the issue was no longer tolerated and was considered blasphemous and punishable by death (which by the way is still in the churchs rule books). this resulted in the deaths of thousands of christians due to a difference in opinion.
funnily enough, there is a christian denomination that still believes in the pre-trinity idealogy; the unitarian denomination. but of course they are denounced by the national council of churches. if the above is not true, then where do the unitarians get their belief? the basis of their supports stems from Luke 4:8, "...Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve." furthermore, many middleeastern christians have very different views on the trinity than the western world. and as one christian pointed out to me a long time ago in arizona, some of the lesser known gospels make no mention of the trinity.
now, my questions: 1) please correct my history. 2) please explain the trinity in terms that i can understand.
thanks.
our God is one Lord.".
my understanding of the trinity is that god is the union of divine three, the father, the son and the holy spirit (or ghost). that in itself is confusing enough. yet the Bible says in I Corinthians 14:33 that "... God is not the author of confusion...". fair enough.
parts of the Athanasian Creed do not really help: "...we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity... for there is one Person of the Father, another of the Son, another of the Holy Ghost is all one... they are not three gods,but one God... the whole three persons are co-eternal and co-equal...he therefore that will be save must thus think of the Trinity...".
now Athanasius was a bishop who supposedly formulated this doctrine. i am not claiming this as fact, but i am asking for clarifications.
baptism in the name of the father, and of the son, and of the holy ghost was never seen in Pauls letters in the early church. in fact Paul only baptized in the name of Jesus.
"the great commission" in the first written gospel, bears no mention of father/son/spirit , ref. Mark 16:15.
reference in the bible to a trinity can be found in the Epistle of I John 5:7, biblical scholars of today, however, have admitted that the phrase "...there are three that bear record in heaven, the father, the word, and the holy ghost: and these three are one" is definitely not found in any of today's
versions of the bible despite being in very older versions.
now as far as i read, Paul of Tarsus, the originator of christianity as we know it today formulated many doctrines but surprisingly the trinity was not one of them. Tertullian, a lawyer and presbyter of the third century Church in Carthage, was the first to use the word "Trinity".
in 325AD a council of about 300 bishops gathered for about 6 weeks in Nicea and formualted the doctrine of the trinity in todays understanding; father/son/spirit.
this happened after controversy on Pauls definition in 318 AD between arius the deacon and his bishop alexander. for political reasons (having a unified church), constantine, the emperor, ordered the council of 325AD.
and after much debate (to cut a long story short), in 451 AD, the council of chalcedon, with the blessing of the pope set the creed (trinity) as christian law. debate on the issue was no longer tolerated and was considered blasphemous and punishable by death (which by the way is still in the churchs rule books). this resulted in the deaths of thousands of christians due to a difference in opinion.
funnily enough, there is a christian denomination that still believes in the pre-trinity idealogy; the unitarian denomination. but of course they are denounced by the national council of churches. if the above is not true, then where do the unitarians get their belief? the basis of their supports stems from Luke 4:8, "...Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve." furthermore, many middleeastern christians have very different views on the trinity than the western world. and as one christian pointed out to me a long time ago in arizona, some of the lesser known gospels make no mention of the trinity.
now, my questions: 1) please correct my history. 2) please explain the trinity in terms that i can understand.
thanks.
Last edited: