Unfortunately, there has been and still are, many having deeply invested their belief's and emotions in the notion that NASA or even SETI are the least bit focused upon true space research and exploration. Nothing could be further from the truth, and that "truth" is truly becoming illusive at best.
SETI and mostly NASA, these are massive money consuming machines, insuring job security at somewhat considerable benefits (what the pay lacks, those benefits and entitlements make up for, as sort of like milking a cow, the more tits you can hold onto the more milk you get).
As world class bureaucracies go, each accomplishment is measured by a work force having a minimum factor of 10, further supported by a logistics and outfitting factor of 100. Thereby; doing a job that might take a privet sector team of 10, NASA's version would be requiring 100. Accomplishing any task that requires further logistics and outfitting; such as a privately funded project represented by one million dollars, here again, NASA's format would have taken at least 100 millions worth. So, multiply the crew factor by 10 and the outfitting/support by 100, obviously the true task at hand is no longer the research itself but, the massive infrastructure and forced/mandated overhead, that which demands far more skill and management and thereby highly paid individuals with sufficient power as to overseeing this mess.
The reasons why it takes so many additional folks, along with that 100 times outfitting investment, has a great deal to do with cloaking for NSA/DoD agendas. Just that "nondisclosure" enforcement aspect alone represents 25% of your crew and infrastructure, then actually cloaking on behalf of NSA/DoD can pull as much as 50% of that budget. Toss in the usual governmental personnel management levels, benefits and entitlements programs and the never ending hustle for those higher "G" ratings and that's easily squandering 20% of your resources, plus the fact that at any one time, at least 15% of your crew is on some form of administrative leave, vacations, sick leave and/or undergoing paid training as related to their next job advancement.
Basically, it's taking at least 10 (often 20) to do the job of one and then you simply can't share facilities nor support services (primarily due to all that "nondisclosure crap", which is only there because of the cloaking on behalf of NSA/DoD agendas). Then it takes 100 times the outfitting and annual support investments (multiple massive buildings, multiple sites, loads of highly paid front end and PR staffing and always security infrastructure plus their facilities and outfitting, along with fleets of motor pools, plus privet and/or chartered aircraft with all their crews and infrastructure that make all that happen and, we haven't even gotten to the actual individuals that are supposedly doing the intended job, so I'm not certain that a 10:1 ratio will actually cut it, it might be a whole lot more like 20:1).
As you can see, if anyone such as myself were to come along with a done deal towards communications efforts, that which needs no further engineering nor new resources; where is the NASA/NSA/DoD beef in that?
How can government go about hiring tens of thousands and then outfit them with gobs of infrastructure and technology plus logistics and facilities (mostly useful to NSA/DoD agendas), thereby most easily extracting whatever for their cloak and dagger partners (NSA/DoD), when my proposals need non of the above. What good is it when my research discovery of significant structures existing on Venus is a done deal and, we simply need to make our first contact and start asking questions. Why even go there if we can so easily establish two-way binary packet laser communications, as duplexing away at audio and video exchanges.
Actually being on Venus, this is almost as humanly stupid and hopefully pointless as our going after those lethal Mars microbes.
It's not that we can't go to planets like Mars or Venus; where Mars will be in the investment range of at least one trillion dollars (plus 2 decades having no chances whatsoever of privet enterprise nor paying passengers), as opposed to 100 billion for the Venus expedition (we can manage L2 right now, plus offering all sorts of enterprise and paying passenger potential). As we already know that someone (a whole lot smarter then you or I) exist on Venus and, that we have been at fault (12 years worth) for not acting upon it. The very most of any new future requirement might be, is that of a Venus L2 platform (robotic and/or manned), from which our mutual signals can be relayed (boosted) and, we can certainly accomplish that one with what we already know.
For God's sake, CNN could manage this initial phase. So who the hell needs NASA or ESA for that matter?
What is NASA fearing?
The real threat (job security), not the uncovering of what's on Venus nor even the Apollo ruse of our century (most involved in that one are either dead or nearly retired with full benefits and entitlements in tact).
Perhaps if not ESA, then Germany, China/Cuba and naturally Russia should be those best aligned as to taking advantage of what NASA simply can't function under. For one thing, as Venus comes into our local laser range, we'll each have four months of communications opportunities, requiring no costly launches, no new satellites nor any spacecrafts, not likely even any new ground facilities and damn few staff. Once auto-tracking laser cannons are placed on-line, that's pretty much it, everyone goes home to watch live Venus broadcasting (within a few minutes delay and, not otherwise the multi thousand + years worth of anything SETI has yet to even produce).
I have two sites chuck full of research and ideas, no ulterior motives, no cloak and dagger associations with the likes of NSA/DoD and no "nondisclosure" getting in the way. Since I have those "extraordinary" proof images as opposed to my opposition having squat, if you need further clarifications, ideas or just want to talk about the possibilities, that's exactly what should be done.
If you feel the need as to purely criticize because my statements are making you fell like a total fool, or that my syntax is not up to your higher standards, perhaps you are even feeling like a pathetic jerk for believing in NASA, that's OK too because, I've been snookered by those having "the right stuff" for more the 35 years worth of lies and outright deception and, I now believe 10's of thousands of lives have been needlessly lost due to that all American way of life (that's not even including those 9/11 folks, as what the hell did they do as to deserve dying for?).
Unlike NASA, I do make my fair share of mistakes and, I keep trying to discover them beforehand, but I'm simply not as perfect as my opponents and apparently nowhere as NASA religious neither. There is nothing worse than a bad cult want-to-be member, especially one that's making all the others look like criminals, the ones you and I think of as being behind those bars or worse.
These following are just a few of the resources at hand, which I'll keep adding to and further editing, so please do check back. The first clues that all of what I have to offer is of sufficient "truth", this will come from the words of my opponents and perhaps even from NASA, as their objections have not been scientifically founded and, that I can prove.
http://guthvenus.tripod.com
http://geocities.com/bradguth
http://geocities.com/bradguth/hello.htm
http://geocities.com/bradguth/no-lie.htm
http://geocities.com/bradguth/positive.htm
SETI and mostly NASA, these are massive money consuming machines, insuring job security at somewhat considerable benefits (what the pay lacks, those benefits and entitlements make up for, as sort of like milking a cow, the more tits you can hold onto the more milk you get).
As world class bureaucracies go, each accomplishment is measured by a work force having a minimum factor of 10, further supported by a logistics and outfitting factor of 100. Thereby; doing a job that might take a privet sector team of 10, NASA's version would be requiring 100. Accomplishing any task that requires further logistics and outfitting; such as a privately funded project represented by one million dollars, here again, NASA's format would have taken at least 100 millions worth. So, multiply the crew factor by 10 and the outfitting/support by 100, obviously the true task at hand is no longer the research itself but, the massive infrastructure and forced/mandated overhead, that which demands far more skill and management and thereby highly paid individuals with sufficient power as to overseeing this mess.
The reasons why it takes so many additional folks, along with that 100 times outfitting investment, has a great deal to do with cloaking for NSA/DoD agendas. Just that "nondisclosure" enforcement aspect alone represents 25% of your crew and infrastructure, then actually cloaking on behalf of NSA/DoD can pull as much as 50% of that budget. Toss in the usual governmental personnel management levels, benefits and entitlements programs and the never ending hustle for those higher "G" ratings and that's easily squandering 20% of your resources, plus the fact that at any one time, at least 15% of your crew is on some form of administrative leave, vacations, sick leave and/or undergoing paid training as related to their next job advancement.
Basically, it's taking at least 10 (often 20) to do the job of one and then you simply can't share facilities nor support services (primarily due to all that "nondisclosure crap", which is only there because of the cloaking on behalf of NSA/DoD agendas). Then it takes 100 times the outfitting and annual support investments (multiple massive buildings, multiple sites, loads of highly paid front end and PR staffing and always security infrastructure plus their facilities and outfitting, along with fleets of motor pools, plus privet and/or chartered aircraft with all their crews and infrastructure that make all that happen and, we haven't even gotten to the actual individuals that are supposedly doing the intended job, so I'm not certain that a 10:1 ratio will actually cut it, it might be a whole lot more like 20:1).
As you can see, if anyone such as myself were to come along with a done deal towards communications efforts, that which needs no further engineering nor new resources; where is the NASA/NSA/DoD beef in that?
How can government go about hiring tens of thousands and then outfit them with gobs of infrastructure and technology plus logistics and facilities (mostly useful to NSA/DoD agendas), thereby most easily extracting whatever for their cloak and dagger partners (NSA/DoD), when my proposals need non of the above. What good is it when my research discovery of significant structures existing on Venus is a done deal and, we simply need to make our first contact and start asking questions. Why even go there if we can so easily establish two-way binary packet laser communications, as duplexing away at audio and video exchanges.
Actually being on Venus, this is almost as humanly stupid and hopefully pointless as our going after those lethal Mars microbes.
It's not that we can't go to planets like Mars or Venus; where Mars will be in the investment range of at least one trillion dollars (plus 2 decades having no chances whatsoever of privet enterprise nor paying passengers), as opposed to 100 billion for the Venus expedition (we can manage L2 right now, plus offering all sorts of enterprise and paying passenger potential). As we already know that someone (a whole lot smarter then you or I) exist on Venus and, that we have been at fault (12 years worth) for not acting upon it. The very most of any new future requirement might be, is that of a Venus L2 platform (robotic and/or manned), from which our mutual signals can be relayed (boosted) and, we can certainly accomplish that one with what we already know.
For God's sake, CNN could manage this initial phase. So who the hell needs NASA or ESA for that matter?
What is NASA fearing?
The real threat (job security), not the uncovering of what's on Venus nor even the Apollo ruse of our century (most involved in that one are either dead or nearly retired with full benefits and entitlements in tact).
Perhaps if not ESA, then Germany, China/Cuba and naturally Russia should be those best aligned as to taking advantage of what NASA simply can't function under. For one thing, as Venus comes into our local laser range, we'll each have four months of communications opportunities, requiring no costly launches, no new satellites nor any spacecrafts, not likely even any new ground facilities and damn few staff. Once auto-tracking laser cannons are placed on-line, that's pretty much it, everyone goes home to watch live Venus broadcasting (within a few minutes delay and, not otherwise the multi thousand + years worth of anything SETI has yet to even produce).
I have two sites chuck full of research and ideas, no ulterior motives, no cloak and dagger associations with the likes of NSA/DoD and no "nondisclosure" getting in the way. Since I have those "extraordinary" proof images as opposed to my opposition having squat, if you need further clarifications, ideas or just want to talk about the possibilities, that's exactly what should be done.
If you feel the need as to purely criticize because my statements are making you fell like a total fool, or that my syntax is not up to your higher standards, perhaps you are even feeling like a pathetic jerk for believing in NASA, that's OK too because, I've been snookered by those having "the right stuff" for more the 35 years worth of lies and outright deception and, I now believe 10's of thousands of lives have been needlessly lost due to that all American way of life (that's not even including those 9/11 folks, as what the hell did they do as to deserve dying for?).
Unlike NASA, I do make my fair share of mistakes and, I keep trying to discover them beforehand, but I'm simply not as perfect as my opponents and apparently nowhere as NASA religious neither. There is nothing worse than a bad cult want-to-be member, especially one that's making all the others look like criminals, the ones you and I think of as being behind those bars or worse.
These following are just a few of the resources at hand, which I'll keep adding to and further editing, so please do check back. The first clues that all of what I have to offer is of sufficient "truth", this will come from the words of my opponents and perhaps even from NASA, as their objections have not been scientifically founded and, that I can prove.
http://guthvenus.tripod.com
http://geocities.com/bradguth
http://geocities.com/bradguth/hello.htm
http://geocities.com/bradguth/no-lie.htm
http://geocities.com/bradguth/positive.htm
Last edited:
