But that means , and I have seen you, that you are on the internet more than myself, you always seem to be there, that suggests a worse illness than you suggest for me, have you been the doctors about it?
Paper help.
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
That would be a lie on your part.
This matches your other claims of "knowledge" - i.e. what you say you know is wrong.
Um, actually the truth does alter [1]. But, in this particular case, what you've got isn't the truth. Es ist nicht einmal falsch.
1 I'm alive being one truth that's subject to alteration. It's 2:47 AM another...
Last edited:
Really?
And what illness have I suggested for you?
I've commented on your rationality, you think that (whatever) I have is worse than irrationality?
Did it not occur to you that I could have taken early retirement?
Whut?
I'm pushing for nothing. But I'm betting when a mod does look into this continued crap from you, and reads the rebukes to your crazy idea, and the continued ignorant replies, then it maybe moved.
That's not up to me nor is where this thread will end up, but I'll try and give you some advice at this point.....
If you are fair dinkum and not trolling [personally I believe that is what you are doing] then you need to consider your current stance, when all and sundry are decrying your nonsense.
When that happens, you should sit back, have a breather, do some thinking, take an aspro and have a good lay down.
Because its very very rare that the whole world could be wrong about one individual.
So do some soul searching, because you really do have a problem with the delusions you are under.
And although they all may have laughed at Galileo, [and you certanly most positively are no Galileo] they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
In court this case would be adjourned until at least the judge had the mental condition of one of the participants checked out.
Then I suggest he would call a "no case to answer" because there were no axioms to begin with.
Again you try to confuse by casting aspersions on your critics while they all apply to yourself.
Dywyddyr has a reputation on this forum for helping people that do want to learn, and telling it like it is to those that wish to abuse the open nature of this forum, by their continued anti science trolling and raving rants.
You obviously do not want help and are just as obviously trolling.
I may start another topic called the world is delusional.
How can you say that I have no axioms when all I am really stating with my entire paper is the truth?
You are still for no apparent reason trying to deny the absolute truth.
If the Sun was to vanish it is dark, the truth.
Light is emitted through the dark, the truth.
Maths is an invention that fits a purpose, the truth.
Time is certainly not an atom or a clock , the truth.
Want to deny this again?
Members of this forum are asking me to believe in magic by telling me I have to deny the truth.
How can you say that I have no axioms when all I am really stating with my entire paper is the truth?
You are still for no apparent reason trying to deny the absolute truth.
If the Sun was to vanish it is dark, the truth.
Light is emitted through the dark, the truth.
Maths is an invention that fits a purpose, the truth.
Time is certainly not an atom or a clock , the truth.
Want to deny this again?
Members of this forum are asking me to believe in magic by telling me I have to deny the truth.
I really thought you understand science and what science was, and what science is about, I do not just offer axioms , I offer experimental observation.
Presently no one has said anything involving science, except myself in this thread, you are not discussing ,and drawing up a own personal conclusion out of feelings.
There is several axioms in this thread, that you are trying to deny.
You can not deny them, so stop being obtuse and please discuss this.
As has been pointed out: the ACTUAL problem here is that YOU don't understand science.
And thus you persist in sticking to your own deeply flawed perception of it (I won't say "understanding of it" since it's clear you have no understanding).
We are being scientific; you are not.
No, like that statement from you, there is no science involved, you are just out for a slanging match where you always have to be correct. You may have slipped into all these science forums, and to get yourself liked, you just quote mainstream back, I can do that, anyone can do that, it is easy to say you are wrong, and that is the extent of the information you provide.
You do not work, troll all day long, I do not see any of the science skills you claim to have.
You can not even answer the simple questions truthfully.
I will ask you again, if the Sun vanishes , Earth becomes dark, Yes or no? , it is a simple enough question.
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
Nonsense. Everyone on this forum recognises you talk non-stop rubbish. Dywyddyr is just one of the few that bothers to interact with you. There is actually a reason why you have been banned from these other forums.
And asking silly questions, as a way to prolong discussion of your daft ideas, is not going to work.
Again I ask you to provide science. Again I ask you to answer the silly little questions, that may seem to be trivial, but in science no question is trivial.
You know if you start answering me truthfully, then you have to agree with me, because it is the truth. The truth over rules all.
Why deny the truth , what is the big deal?
Wrong.
Also wrong.
Which relevant because...?
Nope.
That's because you're incapable of recognising science.
That has been answered, by ME and others.
Please stop lying.
Last edited:
wrong, put his posts in the trash, he his incorrect, and again avoids the science questions, you are not a scientist, you have no input to science.
Can not even answer a simple science question.
One more time:
That has been answered, by ME and others.
Please stop lying.
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
The big deal is that you are a total plonker. Answering you is thus a waste of time. There, I've just wasted some. Enough.
One person answered it, you stop lying.
You did not and never answer questions, you have proper slipped into forums to be the troll you are. You have no intention other than to disrupt this thread and other threads, and have a selective manner to who you help or answer.
You have to agree that with no sun it is dark, so you also have to agree that light travels through the dark, so therefore you have to agree that even in the dark time still exists, so you also have to agree that all matter travels through time in the dark, therefore concluding dark is time and space, and all interactions of matter in time and space can not effect time and space.
No dilation of time, no curvature of time and space.
Stop lying.
I see.
You didn't bother reading (although you DID quote part of it) post #60?
You: It is undeniable that if we removed the sun it would be pitch black...
Me: [highlighted so you don't miss it this time] It would be dark, ...
You didn't bother reading post #117?
Here's the relevant bit:
You: If you can tell me that it is not dark with no Sun
Me: No one has claimed otherwise (in fact it's been noted several times that we get light from the Sun).
How are they not an answers?
Which I have done.
No. Dark is not a thing.
Actually I stated that it does. YOU are the one claiming (falsely) it has a "value of zero" (i.e. doesn't exist) in the dark.
False "conclusion".
Arrantly false "conclusion".
Inanely false "conclusion".
Insanely false "conclusion".
Last edited:
- Status