Paper help.

Status
Not open for further replies.
And its rather funny [funny peculiar, not funny haha] why you think I'm a God troll, when most of the God trolls here hate my guts, as do the other trolls such as yourself.
 
No. Your drawings show nothing except blobs, lines and unsupported claims.


Nope.
But, as stated above, your drawings don't relate in any meaningful way to anything Einstein said.


Nope.
You've drawn a line and claimed (falsely) that it's a "proper timeline".
You haven't shown that it is true (or even HOW it is supposed to be true). In short it says nothing of any relevance.


Again, nope.
All you've got is an unsupported claim and a ridiculously childish "diagram" with labels based on unsupported (and incorrect) assumptions.
No they dont, it is just the same garbage from you has always. I have tested my ideas on the public. In a court of law science would get its ass kicked by me.
 
I have tested my ideas on the public.
Then you must have picked a particularly stupid and uninformed sector of the public to "test" these ideas on.
(And that's not how science does things).

In a court of law science would get its ass kicked by me.
Oh, just when I thought hoped you'd run of stupid assertions you come up with another.
 
No they dont, it is just the same garbage from you has always. I have tested my ideas on the public. In a court of law science would get its ass kicked by me.


Liar, liar, pants on fire! :D
How gullible are you to really believe what crap you are posting....let alone anyone else believing it.
 
Then you must have picked a particularly stupid and uninformed sector of the public to "test" these ideas on.
(And that's not how science does things).


Oh, just when I thought hoped you'd run of stupid assertions you come up with another.
In court you would be on oath and could not deny the axioms.
 
Liar, liar, pants on fire! :D
How gullible are you to really believe what crap you are posting....let alone anyone else believing it.
How arrogant are you not to listen and consider the truth. I know you will all push for the ban now, you and the lynch mob always do, I can tell I have said too much for science when the magnitude of replies increase.

You are a professional troll team aren't you?
 
Wow!
You "tested" it on a WHOLE NINE people.
Let's add statistical sampling to the (very long) list of things you're ignorant about.


I know 9 people that like Marmite.
Does that mean "Marmite tastes good" is an axiom?
It is a shame , you could be smart if you wanted to, instead of 24/7 trolling. I know you do not work.
 
In court you would be on oath and could not deny the axioms.
Actually, since (due to my profession) I rarely lie anyway "being on oath" would mean that I would emphatically DENY that they're axioms.
As I have done all the way through this thread.
But, if it makes you feel better to think I'm lying (and also to implicitly accuse me of doing so) then go ahead. We'll just add it to other list: your delusions.
 
Actually, since (due to my profession) I rarely lie anyway "being on oath" would mean that I would emphatically DENY that they're axioms.
As I have done all the way through this thread.
But, if it makes you feel better to think I'm lying (and also to implicitly accuse me of doing so) then go ahead. We'll just add it to other list: your delusions.
You have denied the axioms but offered nothing to deny them, because I know you can not deny them with reason, because the truth can not be altered can it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top