You are completely deluded and arrogant to honest truth's.
Paper help.
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
Between two origins of light , with an increasing distance the light intensity fades to nothing, this can be observed with two flash lights. There is a boundary of un-observable darkness.What you mean is nocturnal animals can see in low light INTENSITIES not that they see low ENERGY photons. The energy of the photons from those distant stars has not decreased, the number of photons has decrease by 1/r^2.
This may or may not happen. The ambient light is from stars in the milky way. The milky way is not expanding due to the expansion of the universe. The gravity of the milky way is overcoming the expansion. So in all likelyhood the ambient light will not fade untill all the stars in the milky way die. However, if the acceleration of the expansion continues it may go to the point of tearing apart the milky way or even tearing apart all matter.
This is the problem with not having an education in science you do not use the correct terms. What you mean is that the intensity of light deceases with distance. Specifically the intensity decreases by the square of the distance.
No one has disputed that light must be in the visual range to see.
Darkness is always there, darkness is not just a shadow.
In other words you can't actually support your claims...
(By the way, any arrogance on my part is thoroughly justified - I got to be arrogant BECAUSE I have an established record of achievement. Your arrogance is based entirely on ignorance).
Except that, as previously noted, you can't provide ANY support to show that they're axioms.
Wow who'd'a thunk it? Insisting on "science disciplines" while discussing a (supposedly) scientific claim on a science forum. I wonder why we'd do that.
Just like this, you mean:
Not and... no.
Progress (since you obviously need telling) is when you , not when you push wilful ignorance.
No. What you've done is completely distorted any science there is to suit your ill-informed preconceptions.
Meaningless crap.
Apart the fact that it has been shown to occur you mean?
You do not know what you are talking about, I have provided plenty of logical axioms and offered testable observational experiments.
You are just being you and trolling like per normal.
Look at the diagram, you can not be that much of fool can you?
The diagram shows clearly why time dilation does not happen. You can say a timing dilation, but not a time dilation, like the diagram shows.
Actually I do.
Nope, you've just claimed they're "logical" and "axiomatic", while ignoring the numerous corrections.
Since you don't have the first clue as to science that would be wrong.
Nope, the closest person to troll in this thread is you: you don't learn, you don't listen and you're completely and utterly wrong.
Your "diagram" is entirely meaningless to anyone but you.
It incorporates YOUR (false assumptions) and doesn't explain a damned thing.
Obviously your dictionary has a different definition of "clearly" from everyone else's.
It shows nothing but your delusion.
Ignoring the numerous corrections? what corrections? you have failed to provide anything that over rules my logical axioms.
I agree I am wrong, I must be because I have to accept your discipline. NOT
It is not me who is wrong.
It is you that does not have the intelligence to see the obvious. Knowledge is not being smart. Knowledge is mimic.
I think you are border line insane to deny the simple logic to tell you the truth.
Oh yeah...
This from the guy who thought adding milk to white paint to make it provide more coverage per tin was a good idea.
That's like Peter Parker telling the Hulk that he's a bit weedy-looking.
You are well over the border line of insane.
Is that the best you have to try to deter my idea?
You are not smart enough to have your own ideas, alls you can do is mimic wiki back, anyone can do that.
If you can tell me that it is not dark with no Sun, then I will go away. Man made does not count.
No I am not, It is you guys who not being objective, that makes you really bad at science, I am objective to myself always.
Look at the time dilation diagrams, it is more than obvious that I am correct.
Your diagrams are meaningless. They look to be something my 6 year old granddaughter would come up with, playing with paint.
Um, that would be false.
My entire career depended on me having my own ideas - as do my hobbies.
Actually I very rarely do that.
No one has claimed otherwise (in fact it's been noted several times that we get light from the Sun).
Uh, why?
Isn't man made light real light or something?
And the whole world ignores your brilliance or fails to recognise it, is that what you want us to accept?
Again, It's quite understandable why you have been banned elsewhere.
Go back to your dream world, you have SFA!!
I do not have to be a Michael Angelo. They are far from pointless, If you can not see the reality of the diagrams, you have no business even considering discussing science.
No, I do not want the world to accept me, I just want science to wake up and smell the obvious roses.
Look at the diagrams, pfff, a six year old could understand the difference in the timing of something and time.
- Status