There is no such thing as "timing dilation caused by gravity extraction of energy".
Time dilation due to gravity results in the passage of time being slower a high gravity region relative to passage of time in a lower gravity region.
Paper help.
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
Time dilation due to gravity results in the passage of time being slower a high gravity region relative to passage of time in a lower gravity region.
You are a Liar. It is you that is wrong, and it is you that has avoided many questions.
Except that the whole world says you are.
You are obviously the liar...you are just as obviously the delusional one....you are the one giving science a bad name.
And we all have ample evidence to support all those claims, including your many total life bannings from many forums.
More evidence of lying delusional behaviour.
It's you that has had lifetime bans imposed at more then one forum....It's you that has had most if not all of your threads moved to the fringe sections, including pseudoscience and cesspool.
You obviously only have half a brain [although that maybe overstating it] as you are the only one accepting such nonsense.
Yep, while they may have laughed at that great genius Galileo, they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
You are a Liar. It is you that is wrong, and it is you that has avoided many questions.
Except that the whole world says you are.
You are obviously the liar...you are just as obviously the delusional one....you are the one giving science a bad name.
And we all have ample evidence to support all those claims, including your many total life bannings from many forums.
More evidence of lying delusional behaviour.
It's you that has had lifetime bans imposed at more then one forum....It's you that has had most if not all of your threads moved to the fringe sections, including pseudoscience and cesspool.
You obviously only have half a brain [although that maybe overstating it] as you are the only one accepting such nonsense.
Yep, while they may have laughed at that great genius Galileo, they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
You are a Liar. It is you that is wrong, and it is you that has avoided many questions.
Except that the whole world says you are.
You are obviously the liar...you are just as obviously the delusional one....you are the one giving science a bad name.
And we all have ample evidence to support all those claims, including your many total life bannings from many forums.
More evidence of lying delusional behaviour.
It's you that has had lifetime bans imposed at more then one forum....It's you that has had most if not all of your threads moved to the fringe sections, including pseudoscience and cesspool.
You obviously only have half a brain [although that maybe overstating it] as you are the only one accepting such nonsense.
Yep, while they may have laughed at that great genius Galileo, they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
I am a liar, you have evidence that I have been banned by other forums, and your opinions are valid for what reason compared to the chart I have kindly provided to you all?
I do not lie, telling the truth is not lying, I understand that something happens by the effects of altitude , but I also understand this is not time, time itself can not be altered.
You can try to twist it has much has you want, but adding a third observer to any of your time dilation experiments shows you why science is so wrong.
It is not my fault that you have it wrong, and I have it right.
That is not correct time itself is affected by a gravitational field.
It has been shown to you several times that adding a 3rd observer does not change the fact of time dilation.
Time itself is effected by nothing especially a gravitational field.
Ok, I will prove it now once and for all, will axiom logic, I am sick of people persisting that in some way time is associated with shapes such has curvature , and altitude, and atoms.
The black oblong in this drawing ,dimensional space, are you saying time does not exist in this dimensional space?
Please just answer with no sarcasm or insults and I will prove it to you.
Attachments
Ignorant? How is not wanting to accept something because I do not see it the same way ignorant?, and you are obviously trying to preach a discipline on me.
My abstract stands, it is your ignorance to the truth and reality, and trying to deny axioms. I suppose you think the Universe is a spherical shape, or probably a flat Universe considering your post content.
The Universe is neither flat or spherical , the Universe is an undefined shape because we simply can not define it. The Universe is not just the matter that is contained in spacial dimensions, the Universe is the empty space, an empty space that we can only observe with limitations to light.
Our visual Universe is only apart of the Universe, the Universe stretches beyond our limitations.
Our Universe is not expanding, matter is expanding into the Universe, there is a huge difference in the misconception.
how does one know what is in the deep end when one has not even stuck their toe in the water ?
Because one can see what is outside the water and going into the water, and one can make a certain conclusion that once a toe has gone into the water, it does not vanish, it remains in the same state has it went into the water.
Astoundingly delusionally stupid, I'm sure he meant to say.
You have no Abstract.....You are in the Alternative hypothesis section, and in the course of time, will probably be shifted to pseudoscience or cesspool, as have all your other nonsense proposals.
Why do I always get the crazy people posting in my threads?
Like I said it is simply you that does not understand.
Yes the entire world is wrong, I am correct, like I am sure Tesla and all argued before me.
yeah, i apologize, i did not mean the question mark, habit.
Go see a doctor fella!
And explain to him that the whole world believes you are wrong, and forums all end up permanently banning you, and no one will recognise this incredible genius that is you.
They also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
Once you've posted, it can't be undone. Better if you could avoid posting in your threads!
Once you pick-up your Nobel Prize, let me know and I'll apologize for doubting you.
So moving on -
Abstract- This paper is intended to give a definite structure or shape to reality, in a primary respect to science process, and to create a primary rule or principle on which something is based, as opposed to present naive set theories.
A reality that looks at the true values of reality, that humanity has quantified, and showing by logical axioms and relativistic thought, that these uses have no other discipline, other than the literal content created by the practitioner.
The primary rule - The content created by the practitioner is only of a naive discipline, based on observational range limitations and must be only foreseen in having use for localised informational technology only and within those limitations set prior by the created literal content, by whom proceeded the practitioner.
Should I put a content guide first before the primary rule?
Abstract- This paper is intended to give a definite structure or shape to reality, in a primary respect to science process, and to create a primary rule or principle on which something is based, as opposed to present naive set theories.
A reality that looks at the true values of reality, that humanity has quantified, and showing by logical axioms and relativistic thought, that these uses have no other discipline, other than the literal content created by the practitioner.
The primary rule - The content created by the practitioner is only of a naive discipline, based on observational range limitations and must be only foreseen in having use for localised informational technology only and within those limitations set prior by the created literal content, by whom proceeded the practitioner.
Should I put a content guide first before the primary rule?
Last edited:
Content.
- Primary Rule
- The Bible and Supernova comparison accepted
- Relativity misleading
- False Perception
- Realism
- Conclusion
Last edited:
i don't think it matters at viXra.org
Thank you for the link, much appreciated as I have no idea how to produce a paper, this link gives me a better idea, I applaud you.
- Status