Oral contraceptives reduces cancer risk !!!

Sputnik

Banned
Banned
The Lancet : Research by Oxford University shows, that the risk of ovarian cancer is highly reduced by oral contraceptives ....also up to 30 years AFTER you stop with the pill.........
Scientists now suggest that all young women should start taking the pill ......even saying the pill should be available over the counter ........hmm.......actually there can be side affects ....:m:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/jan/25/health.cancer

Still , remember to use condoms , there is still a risk of STD including HPV , which seems to be able to induce cervical cancer...........;)
 
"including HPV , which seems to be able to induce cervical cancer..........."

That risk at least can be reduced by vacinating girls (although i dont know why they are just giving it to girls, we dont just give rebbla shots to girls) before they become sexually active

just for interest sake that vacine was developed in AUSTRALIA!!!!!!!
(sorry its Australia day and might as well celebrate it if they are not going to move the stupid thing to where it SHOULD be)
 
"including HPV , which seems to be able to induce cervical cancer..........."

That risk at least can be reduced by vacinating girls (although i dont know why they are just giving it to girls, we dont just give rebbla shots to girls) before they become sexually active

just for interest sake that vacine was developed in AUSTRALIA!!!!!!!
(sorry its Australia day and might as well celebrate it if they are not going to move the stupid thing to where it SHOULD be)

True ....... but there are still no vaccine for several other STD´s ....especially HIV.......
I just mentioned HPV because it can cause cancer :m::p

Happy Australia Day !!!!!!!!
 
"including HPV , which seems to be able to induce cervical cancer..........."

That risk at least can be reduced by vacinating girls (although i dont know why they are just giving it to girls, we dont just give rebbla shots to girls) before they become sexually active

just for interest sake that vacine was developed in AUSTRALIA!!!!!!!
(sorry its Australia day and might as well celebrate it if they are not going to move the stupid thing to where it SHOULD be)

The reason Gardasil and other HPV vaccinations are given to girls is because the main goal of the shot is to prevent the strains of HPV that have a high risk of leading to cervical cancer. There are over a hundred strains of HPV. HPV causes anything to finger warts to genital herpes, and of the ones that lead to genital herpes, only 24 are considered high risk for HPV. Of these 24, Gardsail only vaccinates against a handful, HPV 16, 18, 66, 68 and maybe a couple others. Because the main goal of Gardasil is to prevent cervical cancer, boys don’t need it.
 
i realise that but have you ever wonded why the goverment pays for rebela vacinations?

I will tell you its NOT to stop people from getting rebela (or rather it wasnt when it was started anyway). The aim is to stop PREGNANT women geting rebela. It was felt that it had a much higher success rate if it was given to EVERYONE rather than just girls. THAT is why everyone is vacinated. THAT is why i feel its silly to vacinate only one portion of the population because you CAN iradicate virus's by vacinating everyone. Look at small pox
 
Hormones should NEVER be given to anyone who doesn't desperately need them to avoid insanity (SEVERELY menopausal women.) Hormones are not these harmless little things. They are very powerful and very dangerous. They cause all kinds of cancer, strokes, etc... Anyone who takes them is foolish imo.

Gardasil has been blamed for the death of its victims and other severe side effects like paralysis, Bells Palsy, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, seizures, bloodclots, etc...

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58004
 
Hmm I thought 'the pill' increased the chance of getting breast cancer :shrug:
 
umm if your going to prove THAT point you need a SCIENTIFIC sorce not a news one

TGA said:
No vaccine is completely without side effects, but the diseases they prevent are far more harmful than the effects that can sometimes follow immunisation.
Adverse events following immunisations are carefully monitored in Australia and regularly reviewed by expert advisory groups. A total of 496 suspected adverse events following injections of GARDASIL® have been reported in Australia to November 27, 2007.¶ All have been assessed by an expert committee and in many cases also assessed by local authorities in States and Territories. The great majority are mild and common problems such as soreness, swelling or redness at the injection site (mentioned in 87 reports; 17.5% of reports). Other commonly reported reactions have included headache (96; 19.4%), dizziness (84; 16.9%), nausea (80 reports; 16.1%) and vomiting (30; 6.0%). A significant increase in reporting of adverse events is always seen after a new vaccine is introduced because of the higher level of awareness and lack of familiarity with a new product. Many of the events that are reported (such as headache, feeling dizzy or unwell) will be equally common in people of the same age who have not received the vaccine.

In studies which compared the safety of the vaccine with placebo, large numbers of clinical study participants were given GARDASIL®. The results of these studies were considered in detail by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) before the vaccine was approved for use in Australia. This detailed information not unexpectedly showed some small increases in the rates of local and systemic adverse events with active vaccine compared with placebo and these are set out in the GARDASIL® product information document.

The overall level of reporting for GARDASIL®, following the distribution of approximately 2.2 per million doses in Australia, is very low and consistent with that for other new vaccines and rates reported from other countries. Worldwide, almost 20 million doses have been given. With this number of people receiving the vaccine, even if all healthy and young, some serious events can be expected within days or hours of vaccination by chance alone but not related to vaccination. In Australia, adverse events reported following vaccines are all reviewed every 6 weeks by an expert committee, the Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee (ADRAC), which advises the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). Every six months, detailed reports of adverse events are published in Communicable Disease Intelligence, a quarterly publication of the Department of Health and Ageing, which is distributed to members of the Communicable Diseases Network Australia and other interested health and immunisation providers. No deaths occurring after GARDASIL® have been reported in Australia and no deaths directly linked to the vaccine have been reported in the USA.

An important category of possible reactions to any vaccine or one of its components is allergy. Allergic reactions if severe may require adrenalin injections or other treatment, so the possibility of allergic reaction, although rare, is the reason why all persons providing vaccines must have the necessary drugs and equipment to treat them. To date, there have been 10 reports of anaphylaxis and 45 reports of urticarial reactions (or hives) in Australia following GARDASIL®. The current estimated rate of anaphylaxis based on doses given in Australia is 5.1 per million. Internationally this rate is 1.7 per million doses. The rates for other vaccines given to children and adolescents range from 0 to 3.5 per million doses in international studies.1Anaphylaxis is a rare event but healthcare professionals and patients should be aware of its possible occurrence. The occurrence of anaphylaxis and allergic reactions is not predictable and can occur in anyone regardless of whether they have a previous history of allergy or not. All such cases reported to the TGA to date have either been treated appropriately or have resolved without treatment. The rare occurrence of allergic reactions with GARDASIL® does not change any recommendations regarding the vaccine, but it is important that such reactions are reported promptly by the treating doctor to the State or Territory Health Department or direct to ADRAC, as set out in the Immunisation Handbook.

view on the 27\01\08 at 01:39
 
Hmm I thought 'the pill' increased the chance of getting breast cancer :shrug:

It does. EVERY woman I know who has/had breast cancer took the pill at some point in her life. Some were smokers. Some were not. Most were thin. NONE had genetic history. Weird disease...:(
 
try the goverment health departments

Doctors.net Breast cancer: is the Pill a threat? said:
Qualified risks

The researchers were careful to point out that their findings do not mean that all women who take the contraceptive pill are at a great risk of developing breast cancer.

In his report, Dr Narod stated firmly, 'The findings…are relevant only to women who carry BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations. In general the pill does not appear to increase the risk of breast cancer in the wider population.'

Doctors.net Breast cancer: is the Pill a threat? said:
Dr Sullivan continues, 'Women should not be unduly worried about this particular report, unless they do have a strong family history of breast cancer and then it is vital to consult with their doctor.

Experts warn that it is extremely important to bear in mind that the study in no way suggests the Pill causes an increased breast cancer risk for all women, as there are advantages of taking it, for example a reduction in the risk of ovarian cancer.

Viewed 27/01/08 at 02:21
 
why isn't gardasil given to boys? They carry HPV to and can develop penile cancer from it. Plus if they never get it then they can't give it to their partners right? Cancer is awful, but it seems like everything we do nowadays causes cancer, maybe if eveything causes cancer then nothing does. And gardasil doesn't prevent cervical cancer it just helps possibly prevent cervical cancer. My best friend took the vaccine and still got the HPV it was supposed to prevent, but its not a live virus so it can't hurt too much to take it.
 
cutsie as was pointed out above it only guards against SOME HPV (never herd that it could give you penile cancer)

The other thing is when did she recive the vacine? It only works if you recive the vacine BEFORE infection after all
 
Back
Top