Oil Doesn't Come From Dead Dinosaurs

There are 7 known alkanes on Titan, none of which came from dinosaurs.

That only goes up to heptane.

That doesn't mean there is no octane on Titan...:rolleyes:

Link to an article saying that there is heptane on Titan ?

Also, are you saying that heptane = oil ?
 
Apparently you suck at observing or else you just fail at life.

During its closest flyby of Titan on April 16, NASA's Cassini spacecraft detected some surprisingly complex organic molecules floating in its upper atmosphere.

Specifically, the spacecraft's mass spectrometer picked up the presence of a variety of hydrocarbons, including ethane and even octane - the same substance that boosts performance in automotive engines.

The discovery goes against pre-existing concepts about Titan's atmosphere, particularly that nothing complex could remain there because of the low temperatures.
Owned again.
 
But it is formed in the atmosphere on Titan..
No. Exactly as on Earth, it is formed in the mantle and is spewed forth by it's volcanoes and tectonics.

"Petroleum is the product of a distillation from great depth and issues from the primitive rocks beneath which the forces of all volcanic action lie." -- Alexander Von Humboldt, 1804

"The capital fact to note is that petroleum was born in the depths of the Earth, and it is only there that we must seek its origin." -- Dmitri Mendeleyev, 1877

"All the petroleum, natural gas, and bituminous fields or deposits cannot be regarded as anything else but the products of solfotaric volcanic emanations condensed and held in their passage upward in the porous tanks of all ages of the crust of the earth from the Archaean rocks to the Quaternary. Nothing is so simple and therefore nothing so natural as this origin, and we will see that it can be abundantly proven." -- Eugene Coste, 1903
 
No. Exactly as on Earth, it is formed in the mantle and is spewed forth by it's volcanoes and tectonics.

"Petroleum is the product of a distillation from great depth and issues from the primitive rocks beneath which the forces of all volcanic action lie." -- Alexander Von Humboldt, 1804

I really don't think that's what the article says.
 
That's because your initial point is irrelevant. Oxygen has nothing to do with hydrocarbons.

Strawman fallacy - this is not something i've claimed.


It's relevant because complex hydrocarbons can only be formed at pressures above 30 kilobar: http://www.pnas.org/content/99/17/10976.full

False flag/strawman fallacy - this statement is only true if you assume abiogenesis to be true. The paper you link to explicitly and exclusively examines abiogenesis, and building up alkanes from carbonates.

I'm talking about an entirely different process.



Irrelevant - it does not contradict anything I have said (in fact it agress with it, by implying that even on mars serpentine must form as a result of water interactions as a secondary oxidation product).

"The elemental distribution in the crude oil from all studied deposits does not match such of any known crustal rock." -- Kirill S. Ivanov, 2007

Irrelevant to the discussion (and seemingly in contradiction to Abiogenesis).


Congratulations.

Strawman - i'm not agreeing with you, i'm repeating what you've said.


Falsehood, as well as a strawman. What I actually said was:

Methane cryovolcanism is irrelevant - it doesn't occur on earth.

I've emphasized for you the relevant part that you removed from the sentence. Other then as an appeal to emotion, or an attempt at inflamming someone, was there any particular reason you cut the quote off part way through a word (not to mention excluding a word which is crucial to the context of the sentence)?

Or are we simply to assume that your argument is that weak that the only way you feel you can 'win' it is by resorting to logical fallacies, outright lies, and factually inaccurate articles?

Oxygen and fatty acids are irrelevant. Complex hydrocarbons can only be formed at pressures above 30 kilobar. No biological molecule can survive in the mantle.

This statement is inaccurate, and contains strawman fallacies.

Fatty acids form part of the carbon recycled back into the mantle at subduction zones.
I did not mention the mantle in my post.
30 kilobar is only relevant if you're discussing abiogenesis from carbonates.
 
LOL.

How many dinosaurs live on Titan?

Strawman fallacy - Nobody has made any claims regarding the presence or absence of dinosaurs on Titan.

Strawman fallacy - It has already been pointed out to you that the ethane on Titan is created by a different mechanism (photolysis/recombination) that is not viable within the lithosphere, or within the mantle, as there is no source of UV radiation.
 
this statement is only true if you assume abiogenesis to be true. The paper you link to explicitly and exclusively examines abiogenesis, and building up alkanes from carbonates.
The paper is not an assumption. It's a conclusion based upon observation and the scientific method.

I'm talking about an entirely different process.
What process?

Irrelevant - it does not contradict anything I have said (in fact it agress with it, by implying that even on mars serpentine must form as a result of water interactions as a secondary oxidation product).
You've already said you believe that oxidation prevents the formation of methane. Sorry Charlie and LOL at your blatant contradictions. You're still my favorite poster.

Fatty acids form part of the carbon recycled back into the mantle at subduction zones.
No biological molecule can survive subduction into the mantle.

I did not mention the mantle in my post.
That's because you are ignorant.

30 kilobar is only relevant if you're discussing abiogenesis from carbonates.
That's exactly what we're discussing...:rolleyes: What do you think we're discussing? Dinosaurs?
 
Back
Top