The statistics are relevant because we are drilling deeper than the deepest fossils ever discovered into igneous rock looking for oil and finding it.
Spoken like a true scientist...Look dude, you don't know shit about the subject, so take a beer and read this article:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/may/27/carbonemissions.energy
You are living in a dreamworld, go back where you were in the last 10 or so months...
A False Claim and your link does not even mention any such nonsense, but it does have plenty of nonsense about an a-biotic origin for oil....why are petroleum companies drilling 40,000 deep into igneous rock looking for oil?
http://www.gasresources.net/DisposalBioClaims.htm
It's called an enhanced-Enterprise class drillship and it can drill in 12,000 feet of water and 40,000 feet total depth. There are 4 of them under construction which you would know if you actually read the annual report. Discoverer Clear Leader, Discoverer Americas, Discoverer Inspiration, and the yet unnamed GSF Newbuild.You are also falsely claiming TransOcean has a ship that can drill to 40,000 feet.
http://www.deepwater.com/fw/main/Were_Never_Out_of_Our_Depth-140.htmlThe dual-activity technology, along with a new and enhanced top drive system, an expanded high-pressure mud-pump system, expanded completions capabilities and other unique features of the drillship target the drilling of wells up to 40,000 feet of total depth.
What you said in post 335 was:It's called an enhanced-Enterprise class drillship and it can drill in 12,000 feet of water and 40,000 feet total depth.{Billy T insert: If you mean total bore of 40,000 feet then that is feasible. At 40K feet depth it is too hot and high pressure to drill. Probably if oil were to seep down that deep, it would break down all of the higher molecular weight components into lighter ones or even just into CH4. The deep oil Brazil is now discoverying is much lighter than the oil directly above the 4000 meter thick salt layer that the older off shore wells tapped.}...
...Brazil is a very large country, but has no known oil on land and Petrobras (who Oilismastery thinks supports his nonsense!) does not even explore there (only off shore in Brazil) because the territory of Brazil was never the floor of an ocean. (It is up-lifted rocks*, from deep in the Earth, lots of valuable minerals and very large beautiful crystal on many types (gemstones included) due to fact that they cooled slowly for eons deep in the Earth.
In contrast, the mid East "oil belt," which is basically an arc thur those oil producers all the way to Burma, was 200 Million years BP and earlier for long time, the floor of the gigantic Tethyan Ocean** with Iraq and Iran being the center of the "subduction zone" where huge quantities of organic material were taken down into the earth for transformation into oil. Some parts of this ancient Tethyan Ocean oil arc such as Turkey and Bangladesh are not well explored yet because of their political problems mainly, I think. Turkey is starting to seriously spend money now exploring. See:
http://www.offshore-mag.com/display..._contracts_largest_ever_Black_Sea_3D_surveys/After this was posted, India has started to drill and did find oil along the old ocean arc also. - I gave link to that activity recently. I continue to predict that some day Bangladesh, when it can get its act together, will find oil in this old ocean deep floor arc also.
-------------------------
*If oil really did come from a-biotic origin deep in the Earth then as Brazil is now those deep structures raised up to the surface, you would expect oil to be flowing out the hill sides in Brazil, instead of non-existent! There appears to be no limit to oilismastery's ignorance, lack of logic, and ability to think clearly or at least avoid self contradictions.
**For more on the Tethyan Ocean, see post 272 where I repeated from wiki:
"... The Tethyan Trench extended at its greatest during Late Cretaceous to Paleocene, from what is now Greece to the Western Pacific Ocean. Sub-duction at the Tethyan Trench probably caused the continents Africa and India to move towards Eurasia, which resulted in the opening of Indian Ocean. When the Arabian and Indian plates collided with Eurasia, the Tethys Ocean and the trench closed. Remnants of the Tethyan Trench can still be found today in Southeastern Europe and southwest of Southeast Asia. ..."
If abiotoic oil were real, then places like death valey would be called "oil lake." Oil is only found in significant quantities where there once was a deep ocean bottom accumulating organic sediment too deep and cold* for it to be oxidized. If oil came from deep in the Earth, then it would be found at low points on land and bubbling up along all the fault lines. Hell most of California's cities would have slide out into the sea on a film of oil.while these deep wells have yet to prove oil to be abiotic in origin,...
The obvious irony is that, while these deep wells have yet to prove oil to be abiotic in origin, they certainly buttress peak oil theory. No one would be bothering with such difficult and expensive drilling if the low lying fruit hadn't already been picked.
LOL. Oil is formed by extreme temperatures and pressures, not destroyed by them. The presence of abiomarkers in oil called diamondoids which can only be formed in the mantle should be a clue for people with more than 2 braincells.oil, it begins to "crack" into lighter fractions just as it does with man's processing (at lower pressure and higher temperature) in refineries to brake the less valuable high molecular weight components into the more desirable, lighter fractions like gasoline. This is no doubt why all deep oil, including Brazil's very recent finds, is light oil.
Any notion which might suggest that hydrocarbon molecules spontaneously evolve in the regimes of temperature and pressure characterized by the near-surface of the Earth, which are the regimes of methane creation and hydrocarbon destruction, does not even deserve consideration.”
Professor Emmanuil B. Chekaliuk, at All-Union Conference on Petroleum and Petroleum Geology, Moscow, 1968.
Your claim that marine sediments form oil is analogous to saying that human skin forms blood.You have never responded to my observation that all major oil deposits are in the deep sections of ancient sea beds where the organic debris accumulated and was well protected from oxygen.
Oil has been found in precambrian sediments which means some oil is older than life itself.
www.sibran.ru/psb/show_text.phtml?eng+3840+9+
LOL. I won't bother asking you to support your claim with a link because there is no such link.why is that ? - life was around for at least 3000 million years before the cambrian
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PrecambrianLOL. I won't bother asking you to support your claim with a link because there is no such link.
FYI there is no time before the Precambrian eons because the Precambrian is the first time period. Therefore 3 billion years prior to the Precambrian is absurd.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precambrian
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/03/3/text_pop/l_033_28.html
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/precambrian/proterolife.html
http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9117440/Precambrian-time
http://facstaff.gpc.edu/~pgore/geology/geo102/precamb.htm
etc.
A small selection of the 1,000,000+ hits for "precambrian life". All of those I looked at (about thirty) noted the first evidence of life about 3.5 to 3.6 billion years ago, three billion years before the Cambrian, just as synthesiser -patel said.
Of course little that OilisMastery states has any factual base and much is simply contradicted by the facts, but I want to thank you for your last reference (the one above). It is very clear, concise, well organized and illustrated with photos of the actual fossils now in museums. Although I have some prior knowledge, I learned a lot from it. Thanks again....http://facstaff.gpc.edu/~pgore/geology/geo102/precamb.htm
etc.
A small selection of the 1,000,000+ hits for "precambrian life". All of those I looked at (about thirty) noted the first evidence of life about 3.5 to 3.6 billion years ago, three billion years before the Cambrian, just as synthesiser -patel said.
People don't drill down deep just anywhere because it's too expensive. If oil is made from biological detritus, how come you can't stick a toothpick in the ground anywhere and get a blowout?Three questions to OilisMastery (not that I expect any answer):
(1) If oil is made deep in the Earth a-biotically and seeps up to or near to the surface, then why is it not found almost anywhere one drills down deep?
Your question is based upon false principles. We don't only find natural gas when we drill deep. Tupi: 8 billion barrels of crude oil. Carioca: 33 billion barrels of crude oil.(2) Why are most wells "dry holes" or if very deep, only find natural gas, if they find any fossil fuel?
Any idea what temperature causes oil to break apart? What's your point here?Simple experiments show oil decomposes thermally.
This fact is currently exploited in every oil refinery to convert the heavier molecules into the more valuable lighter fractions, such as octane, in a process commonly (and quite accurately ) called “cracking.” – I.e. the big molecules are cracked thermally into smaller ones.
Probably because the whole world was covered in water at one point or another.(3) Why is oil only found in significant quanties where there once was a deep ocean?
How come you can't turn algae into crude oil in a lab? How much algae does it take to make a barrel of oil? Now it's your turn to answer questions. I'll be waiting.I.e. In a place when tons of dead algae bodies accumulated (During the eras, millions of years, when you falsely say there was not life) in the deep oceans.
A place where the water is very cold. (4C water is the most dense and flows even to the equator from both polar regions in these deepest parts of the ocean even today.)
A place where there is no significant amount of oxygen (or any life requiring oxygen).
This dead algae accumulated in the ocean depths where it cannot oxidize before being convected downward by motion of the tectonic plates with or without being first covered by slit when ocean flow patterns changed due to climatic changes and the fact that the locations of the land masses was slowly changing. (Brazil was once joined to Africa, near where Nigeria is today and both have off-shore oil from the ocean that opened as the separated.)
Oil is not associated with algae in any way whatsover. We are drilling for oil deeper than any algae and finding it.Nothing in your a-biotic model makes any sense or explains why oil is only found where the ancient algae could accumulate without oxidation.
I answered your questions but I know you won't answer mine because you can't.Again I expect no answer to these three questions as that would require you to know these facts and think logically.
FYI there is no time before the Precambrian eons because the Precambrian is the first time period. Therefore 3 billion years prior to the Precambrian is absurd.
The Earth is only 4.5 billion years old. Borrow a clue.
So why did you bring up the Cambrian Era? I said petroleum has been found in Precambrian sediments. Then you bring up the Cambrian.No-one has said before the precambrian fool.
I'm beginning to get the impression that your earnest belief in abiotic hypothesis stems from a complete inability to comprehend simple words and sentences
here's a free clue on me - you can keep it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geological_history_of_Earth
life was around for at least 3000 million years before the cambrian