Off-topic posts from the "Evidence that God is real" thread

[Goldtop]

Moderator note: This material has been split off from the following thread:

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/evidence-that-god-is-real.161157

The explanation for the split is here:

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/evidence-that-god-is-real.161157/page-20#post-3544794
---

And so the nastiness begins. This why these threads are a waste of time. Atheists like yourself can't help but get toxic in these discussions. You are incorrigable. That, to me, is the symptom of a person who denies, and rejects God.

Jan.

Ask yourself why you still beat your wife

Jan.

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/scientists-discover-that-atheists-might-not-exist-and-that’s-not-a-joke.160736/page-112

Ahhh, the stench of hypocrisy. How do we then associate your toxic nastiness from those you claim deny and reject God?

 

[Musika]

And so the nastiness begins. This why these threads are a waste of time. Atheists like yourself can't help but get toxic in these discussions. You are incorrigable. That, to me, is the symptom of a person who denies, and rejects God.

Jan.

Yes.
This is Iceaura all over. He is identity politics first and content a very clear second

As he said on a previous occasion, inadvertently revealing his MO:

Falsehood, followed by personal disparagement. No accountability, to reason or anything else. No engagement with any thread issue.
The overt (A)theist posts on a science forum.

 

[Jan Ardena]

It's psychobullshit

That's no way to critique your own post. But I do agree with you. I would have been nicer about it though.

Jan.

 

[Jan Ardena]

Yes.
This is Iceaura all over. He is identity politics first and content a very clear second

As he said on a previous occasion, inadvertently revealing his MO:

Falsehood, followed by personal disparagement. No accountability, to reason or anything else. No engagement with any thread issue.
The overt (A)theist posts on a science forum.

I'm sure he never used to be like this.

Jan.

 

[Dr_Toad]

That's no way to critique your own post. But I do agree with you. I would have been nicer about it though.

Jan.

You really are damaged, aren't you? No wonder everyone here either skirts your issues or just ignores you.

 

[Xelasnave.1947]

That's no way to critique your own post.

You dont seem to understand that what you are doing here is similar to what I did to you when I quoted you saying you were atheist.
You pointed out that was wrong so why do you do wrong here?


Alex

 

[Dr_Toad]

Thanks, Alex. When I do wrong, I do it on purpose, but not often at all.

We all pay a price for wrong.

 

[Michael 345]

So this thread has been Chess playing pigeon jacked from

Produce Evidence of god

to

Does god exist

Why am I not surprised?

 

[iceaura]

A loaded question or complex questionfallacy is a question that contains a controversial or unjustified assumption

Such as (almost?) every question you have ever asked on this forum.
It's possible I overlooked an honest question from you somewhere. If one is pointed out to me, I will apologize.

What are you talking about?

The silliness of your claim that by all definitions any deity is Truth, and the error of your claim that your God is Truth.

It may have been pointed out, but that does not make the points true.

Of course not. The factual nature of the observation is supported elsewhere. That you have had it pointed out to you several times was the assertion.

If you accept there is no evidence for God, then you have created a straw god, and believe there is no evidence for Straw God.

The subject was your false claim that atheists in general reject and deny your God. The observation was that most don't.

And so the nastiness begins. This why these threads are a waste of time.

So quit wasting your time. Go away. After all, nothing you post here is an honest contribution to a science forum - so why bother?

 

[Musika]

Well, lessee - I'm pretty sure most people here can provide evidence of the existence of food, and the scientifically inclined can provide evidence of the existence of nourishment and hunger, without much in way of epistemological complexities.

So where's the analogy to evidence for God, in that "analogy" ?

Everyone else is taking your word for that. You keep telling us about your struggles, invoking analogies to illustrate the difficulty of the task, etc., and we are holding off on calling bullshit until you leave us no choice.

The question is why you refuse to tell us which end of the telescope is the right one, and what we would see if we looked down it.

 

[iceaura]

And people think Dawkins is exaggerating, insulting, impolitic.

Forget the reality of God (the dominant Abrahamic deity) - we now need evidence that the entire matter of belief in that deity is not an exercise in self-deception and bad faith.

Because in the absence of countervailing evidence or argument, that has become the default assumption.

 

[Michael 345]

I would have preferred you just answer my question.

If the question was directed to a pigeon you would have more success getting the pigeon to learn the rules of chess than teaching said pigeon that the convention when asked a question you answer the question

 

[StrangerInAStrangeLand]

Man cannot fart therefore all farts are evidence of gods.

<>

 

[iceaura]

In many cases, attitude is practically everything.

In all of your posting here. Every single post.

Which is the stereotypical overt Abrahamic theist's approach, when posting on a science forum. The question is why.

 

[Musika]

In all of your posting here. Every single post.

Coming from a guy who can't tolerate the word "if", it just makes one wonder who exactly owns the foot odour here ...

 

[Michael 345]

So, when you feel like putting the goalposts back, let me know.

You didn't notice the goal post became a cricket wicket????

 

[Sarkus]

You didn't notice the goal post became a cricket wicket????

Trust me, the way I play cricket they're pretty much the same thing!

 

[Michael 345]

now rather than reprogram the various humans decided to throw them all out.

In modern as (some) Americans speak I guess you could call those wiped out the deplorables

Sorry but probably I have been watching to much American politics on TV

address the raping priests...no? Of course now its forgiveness that is rolled out.

I note that from almost 200 recommendations about church pedophile the pope said they would act on all but 2 (I think)

One of those was confession would remain secret

Reason - none one would confess if it was going to be released. Dooh

Soooooo- confession made - absolution given - but safe from any retribution (in legal terms they get a slap on the wrist)

Worse - keep them in the fold plus - send them out to fresh pastures

My solution - a priest who has heard a ped confession and not reported it be subject to the same secular consequences personally

Same rules for any other reportable crime

Curious about how long before confession descends to "I masturbated thinking of girls"

Steps down, picks up soap box, goes for a calming coffee

 

[Xelasnave.1947]

My solution - a priest who has heard a ped confession and not reported it be subject to the same secular consequences personally

I suggest chemical castration using caustic soada.
alex

 

[StrangerInAStrangeLand]

In modern as (some) Americans speak I guess you could call those wiped out the deplorables

Sorry but probably I have been watching to much American politics on TV



I note that from almost 200 recommendations about church pedophile the pope said they would act on all but 2 (I think)

One of those was confession would remain secret

Reason - none one would confess if it was going to be released. Dooh

Soooooo- confession made - absolution given - but safe from any retribution (in legal terms they get a slap on the wrist)

Worse - keep them in the fold plus - send them out to fresh pastures

My solution - a priest who has heard a ped confession and not reported it be subject to the same secular consequences personally

Same rules for any other reportable crime

Curious about how long before confession descends to "I masturbated thinking of girls"

Steps down, picks up soap box, goes for a calming coffee

///
Not trying to excuse anything but a huge part of the problem is forbidding priests to marry.

<>