Does it matter? Are you implying that it's ok for "art buffs" to perv over kiddies but the rest of us can't?
Seconds to Cesspool: 3.. 2.. 1..
Would you like to grow up and see a "portfolio" of yourself in the buff when you were too
Does it matter? Are you implying that it's ok for "art buffs" to perv over kiddies but the rest of us can't?
Seconds to Cesspool: 3.. 2.. 1..
samcdkey: Your thinking wayyy to much into this. This is a very general question. Like I said, there is no sexual innuendo or connotations. No girls sucking lollipops or anything of the sort. It is targeted to the general public, say, at an art museum for example. I repeat, THERE IS NOTHING SEXUAL ABOUT THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
HowWould you like to grow up and see a "portfolio" of yourself in the buff when you were toostupidyoung to know better?:bugeye:
You perv, I bet you hang around parks as well, with your oily smile and camera.
I'm reporting you to SVU, you freak.
How'stupid''young'?
So your saying that if a mother takes a picture of her child while bathing, that makes her a pedophile or a perv?
No, I am no freak or pedophile some shit like that. Drop the insults and threats and try to be a mature individual and have a decent conversation.
Well, that's what the teen years are for. Being sexually manipulated by creepy pervs in parks is a bit different obviously. So: complete ban on nude child photography under any circumstances, then?Well I did some things in my teen years that don't bear repeating.
Don't take offence. It's just her rather sneaky way of avoiding your perfectly sensible question.
Then you misinterpreted the question.
Again, this is a general question. There is absolutely 100% NOTHING sexual about this, so drop it! This question is purely from an artistic standpoint. If you are incapable of thinking from a NON-SEXUAL frame of mind, I strongly suggest that you refrain from posting again.
Don't get your panties in a bunch; that was a forum wedgie; if you poke fun at me, I will take full retribution, y'know (for future reference)
As to the question, it depends like I said on who is taking the picture and why. Personally I would not like nude pics of my kids in circulation (art or no art) with all the weirdos around.
So: complete ban on nude child photography under any circumstances, then?Bozo, it has nothing to do with your oh-so artistic question slash portfolio, but all the oily pervs rubbing themselves over that artistic portfolio.
Sooo... you think it's ok for kids to be photographed as long as they're not your kids?I agree... I know I wouldn't want my kids to be photographed nude for the same reason, but thats my personal perefence and my right to choose as thier father. However, I do not have a problem with nude photography in general as long its completely non-sexual.
I agree... I know I wouldn't want my kids to be photographed nude for the same reason, but thats my personal perefence and my right to choose as thier father. However, I do not have a problem with nude photography in general as long its completely non-sexual.
So: complete ban on nude child photography under any circumstances, then?
Waits. Waits more. Looks at watch. Resumes waiting..