In looking at your site, which you so blatantly advertise here without any substantive participation in our forum in return, I noted these opening statements:
"I have done much research on my own in the area of Egyptology and natural sciences. I have discoverd much about the true purpose of the mysterious pyramids; to the point of the successful application of this true purpose."
In order to have "discoverd" the "true purpose" of the pyramids, it would be safe to assume that you are educated on the data already collected by numerous researchers and archaeologists and are ready to offer a point-by-point refutation of their data and inferences , right?
If not, then it would be apparent that you really haven't conducted any quantitative or qualitative research at all.
Elsewhere on your site, you state, "Our scientists know that north and south fields are opposites, but there is no clear understanding of in what way the 2 fields are opposite."
Then physicists and chemists who have long understood the properties of ferromagnetism and believed it to occur when the unpaired electrons of atoms or ions in a solid are influenced by the orientations of the electrons of their neighbors. They understand this so well, in fact, that they've been able to use what's known about this process in developing magnetic recording tape and comptuter disks.
And, "Science admittedly has no true evidence as to the cause of the aurora Borealis."
What would you qualify as true evidence? It seems that spectral analysis of the light emitted from the aurora, which reveals the oxygen (green-yellow) and nitrogen (blue, purple-red) implies charged particles. The correlation of auroras to solar flares is highly suggestive of the source of the charged particles. The rest is merely testing the hypothesis by charging particles in the lab and accelerating them to collide with O2 and N.
Perhaps you don't see "evidence" for such things if you avoid or sleep through physics and chemistry.
Then, finally, you state, "My goal is to make a reasonable profit retailing the books for $49.95 ">" $79.95 each."
What a con-artist.
Wait. Perhaps I'm being too harsh. If you're not a con-artist, then loan me a copy of your book, which I'll review and return. I'll even seek out opinions from experts in the fields of various subjects you mention in your own self-review. After all, you say, "it will easily be enjoyed by scientist."