News from the Colonies - America's War in Iraq

[Cazzo]

What part of foriegn suicide bombers escapes you?

Considering SAM constantly makes excuses for radical muslim terrorist bombers, it's likely she's sympathetic to them like radical leftists are.
In which case, there's no point in argueing with her.

 

[S.A.M.]

Considering SAM constantly makes excuses for terrorist bombers, it's likely she's sympathetic to them like radical leftists are.

Heh. And this from a person who supports this kind of bullshit

In 2008, [ Justice Karen L. Henderson of the US Supreme Court ] ruled that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a statute that applies by its terms to all “persons” did not apply to detainees at Guantánamo, effectively ruling that the detainees are not persons for purposes of U.S. law

Gitmo detainees are not humans, rules US court.

 

[Buffalo Roam]

So even if the Americans's are guilty of everything that you claim of them?

Does that make it right? Moslems Killing Moslems, murdering Innocent Moslems, in the name of driving out the so called occupiers?

Does that make it right?

Moslems Killing Moslems.

 

[S.A.M.]

Depends. Are they supporting the lying, murdering occupiers? Is there any truth to the "news" reports that the Americans are releasing in Iraq? Do you think it was wrong of the Iraqis to kill Saddam?

 

[Buffalo Roam]

Heh. And this from a person who supports this kind of bullshit



Gitmo detainees are not humans, rules US court.

Read your own reference:

“ In 2008, [ Justice Karen L. Henderson of the US Supreme Court ] ruled that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a statute that applies by its terms to all “persons” did not apply to detainees at Guantánamo, effectively ruling that the detainees are not persons for purposes of U.S. law ”

Gitmo detainees are not humans, rules US court.

effectively ruling that the detainees are not persons for purposes of U.S. law

In legalese that means they have no standing in court, they are not covered under U.S. law because they are not citizens, legal residents, or visitors, not that they aren't human.

Check your facts, Justice Karen L. Henderson, is not on the Supreme Court.

 

[S.A.M.]

Read your own reference:



In legalese that means they have no standing in court, they are not covered under U.S. law because they are not citizens or visitors, not that they aren't human.

No it means they are not persons under US law. What is the definition of a person?

 

[Buffalo Roam]

No it means they are not persons under US law. What is the definition of a person?

No SAM, the ruling means that they do not have standing to plead before the U.S. Legal Courts, because they are not citizens, legal residents, or visitors, not that they aren't human.

 

[Buffalo Roam]

Depends. Are they supporting the lying, murdering occupiers? Is there any truth to the "news" reports that the Americans are releasing in Iraq? Do you think it was wrong of the Iraqis to kill Saddam?

So even if the Americans's are guilty of everything that you claim of them?

Does that make it right? Moslems Killing Moslems, murdering Innocent Moslems, in the name of driving out the so called occupiers?

Does that make it right?

Moslems Killing Moslems.

 

[S.A.M.]

No SAM, the ruling means that they do not have standing to plead before the U.S. Legal Courts, because they are not citizens, legal residents, or visitors, not that they aren't human.

They were kidnapped, tortured and released because they were innocent. But they cannot accuse the US government of torture because they are not persons under US law.

From the same case:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasul_v._Rumsfeld

In January 2008 federal Judge Karen Henderson rejected their lawsuit, declaring that “torture is a foreseeable consequence of the military’s detention of suspected enemy combatants.” A federal appeals court ruled: “It was foreseeable that conduct that would ordinarily be indisputably ‘seriously criminal’ would be implemented by military officials responsible for detaining and interrogating suspected enemy combatants.” The court ruled that the officials could not be sued because they were merely carrying out their official duties.

In other words, people who torture, like the Nazis, are just doing their jobs and should not be held accountable for their actions.

 

[Buffalo Roam]

They were kidnapped, tortured and released because they were innocent. But they cannot accuse the US government of torture because they are not persons under US law.

From the same case:



In other words, people who torture, like the Nazis, are just doing their jobs and should not be held accountable for their actions.

So even if the Americans's are guilty of everything that you claim of them?

Does that make it right? Moslems Killing Moslems, murdering Innocent Moslems, in the name of driving out the so called occupiers?

Does that make it right?

Moslems Killing Moslems.

 

[S.A.M.]

Like I said, people like Saddam and collaborators of the murdering lying occupiers are fair game when trying to defend your country. The Americans have killed people around the world for much less reasons.

But I see you are playing deaf, dumb and blind to the topic. America's war in Iraq.

 

[Buffalo Roam]

Like I said, people like Saddam and collaborators of the murdering lying occupiers are fair game when trying to defend your country. The Americans have killed people around the world for much less reasons.

But I see you are playing deaf, dumb and blind to the topic. America's war in Iraq.

So even if the Americans's are guilty of everything that you claim of them?

Does that make it right? Moslems Killing Moslems, murdering Innocent Moslems, in the name of driving out the so called occupiers?

Does that make it right?

Moslems Killing Moslems.

 

[S.A.M.]

I suppose you have reached the limits of your denial and cannot move forward from here. Carry on. You're the one who looks like a complete fool. I'm interested to see if the moderators will consider your flaming as off topic.

 

[Buffalo Roam]

I suppose you have reached the limits of your denial and cannot move forward from here. Carry on. You're the one who looks like a complete fool. I'm interested to see if the moderators will consider your flaming as off topic.

It still comes down to,

Even if the Americans's are guilty of everything that you claim of them?

Does that make it right? Moslems Killing Moslems, murdering Innocent Moslems, in the name of driving out the so called occupiers?

Does that make it right?

Moslems Killing Moslems.

 

[Buffalo Roam]

I suppose you have reached the limits of your denial and cannot move forward from here. Carry on. You're the one who looks like a complete fool. I'm interested to see if the moderators will consider your flaming as off topic.

So now you run to Asguard, because you can't stand the heat.

He has rescued you several time's now, so one more time won't matter.

 

[iceaura]

“Sanity is perhaps the ability to punctuate.”
— PARRY IDRIS

Hard to argue with that, on the evidence here. Why is it that nutcases so often cannot do the sentence/paragraph thing ? My suspicion is that it would force them to recognize that they aren't making sense -that there is no way to insert punctuation into that stuff without facing its incoherence.

“torture is a foreseeable consequence of the military’s detention of suspected enemy combatants,”

Wow.

 

[Buffalo Roam]

“Sanity is perhaps the ability to punctuate.”
— PARRY IDRIS

Hard to argue with that, on the evidence here. Why is it that nutcases so often cannot do the sentence/paragraph thing ? My suspicion is that it would force them to recognize that they aren't making sense -that there is no way to insert punctuation into that stuff without facing its incoherence.

Wow.

Troll disease seems to be catching on.

From the master of Illogic.

 

[superstring01]

I suppose you have reached the limits of your denial and cannot move forward from here. Carry on. You're the one who looks like a complete fool. I'm interested to see if the moderators will consider your flaming as off topic.

No more than your childish flaming of a new member.

Buffalo is right one the dot concerning you. And considering that you're too immature to apologize or take back your stupidity, I don't see anything wrong with what Buffalo has said to you.

~String

 

[S.A.M.]

So cross posting the same post over and over is not trolling?

I don't see anything wrong with what Buffalo has said to you.

Of course you don't. You support the same system he does.

I see you edited out iceaura's comment on your post. Is it also against the rules to comment on your posts?

Hilarious really, considering this:

Threads, located in the appropriate forum, are bound to be of ingredients that sometimes sting the pallet. I'm all for letting people talk freely.

~String

 

[superstring01]

Really, I see you doing the same, so I guess you're trolling too. GASP! SAM is countered by someone as tenacious, and at least several times as intelligent, as her. Wahhh. Pout a little more princess.

~String

PS-- his comments aren't any worse than you accusing someone of being a sodomite. So, I guess turn-about is fair play.