Yazata
Valued Senior Member
Here's a preprint in pdf format:
http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2016/05/26/055699.full.pdf
It comes from the US 'National Toxicology Program', part of the NIH (National Institutes of Health).
http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/
They exposed male rats (like me!) to low level RF modulated in two common call-phone formats, at two frequencies that cell-phones typically use. They apparently got help from the National Institutes of Standards and Technology in calibrating intensity levels and stuff.
Their results show a "low incidence" of brain and heart cancers. Despite the low incidence, they say that given the widespread use of cell phones all around the world, this could have major health implications.
I've always considered claims that cell phone emissions can cause cancer to be what Sciforums calls "woo", but this new paper makes me less sure of that.
http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2016/05/26/055699.full.pdf
It comes from the US 'National Toxicology Program', part of the NIH (National Institutes of Health).
http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/
They exposed male rats (like me!) to low level RF modulated in two common call-phone formats, at two frequencies that cell-phones typically use. They apparently got help from the National Institutes of Standards and Technology in calibrating intensity levels and stuff.
Their results show a "low incidence" of brain and heart cancers. Despite the low incidence, they say that given the widespread use of cell phones all around the world, this could have major health implications.
I've always considered claims that cell phone emissions can cause cancer to be what Sciforums calls "woo", but this new paper makes me less sure of that.
Last edited: