Nanny from hell?

StrangerInAStrangeLand

SubQuantum Mechanic
Valued Senior Member
June 27 (Reuters) — A California family is exasperated — and fearful — after a 64-year-old woman they hired as a live-in nanny stopped working and has refused to move out of their home after being fired.

Marcella Bracamonte says she and her husband, Ralph, hired Diane Stretton in early March to do chores and watch over their children, ages 11, 4 and 1, in exchange for room and board in their home in Upland, in the Los Angeles area.

About three weeks later, however, Stretton stopped working, saying she has a chronic pulmonary disease, and ignored repeated requests to leave the house, Bracamonte said. She added that the woman also threatened to sue the family for wrongful termination and elder abuse.

"I am very frustrated and very upset. She'd stay in her room 90 percent of the day," Bracamonte told Reuters on Friday. "She was never there to help prepare a meal but was always there to eat the meal, and that was really the only time I would see her."

Bracamonte says she is frightened for her children and her property, adding: "Obviously, she isn't right in the head."

Police have declined to intervene in a civil matter, Bracamonte said, so the family has started a formal eviction process, which they fear could take months.

An Upland police official declined to comment on the case but said that, once a person establishes residency, they must be "formally evicted" under California law, a process that could lead to a court-ordered "forcible eviction" carried out by county sheriff's deputies.

Stretton, who was hired after answering the family's ad on Craigslist, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Her name appears on California's so-called Vexatious Litigant Lists. Bracamonte said the nanny has not been in the family home for about a day.

Video footage from local CBS-affiliate KCAL shows Ralph Bracamonte handing a stoic-looking Stretton a court document as she walks through the living room to her bedroom, and then removes a taped piece of paper from her door.

Another image is that of a bicycle lock securing the refrigerator door handles.

"I am scared that she is going to poison our food, that's why we lock our fridge," Bracamonte said. "I am scared that one day I will come home and I will be locked out of my house. I am scared because her room is right across from my kids. I am scared because she knows the law so well. I am scared that, in this whole fiasco, we are going to get hurt."

(Reporting by Eric M. Johnson in Seattle; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Gunna Dickson)
 
California so-called 'nightmare nanny' says was exploited by family

(Reuters) - A woman dubbed the "nightmare nanny" in U.S. media after she refused to move out of the house of a California family she was working for has said she was being exploited.

Speaking out publicly for the first time, Diane Stretton, 64, told Los Angeles radio station KNX 1070 and television station KTLA in interviews on Monday that she was forced to work for days on end without breaks looking after Ralph and Marcella Bracamonte's three children, and quit before she was fired.

"They were the ones that were trying to exploit me as if I was some poor migrant worker from a foreign country that they could just exploit and work 24/7," Stretton told KNX.

The Bracamontes have said they hired Stretton in March to watch their children and do chores for room and board in their Upland home but that she stopped working within weeks.

They say the nanny told them she had chronic pulmonary disease, ignored repeated requests to leave and made them scared for their property and the safety of their children, ages 11, 4 and 1. Stretton said she was doing her job.

"There wasn't a single day I was there except for the two days I was sick that I didn't do dishes or about two to three hours of cleanup," she told KTLA.

She also told the station the family tried to feed her dog food and that Marcella Bracamonte had a temper.

The Bracamontes could not be reached for comment. But Ralph Bracamonte said on his Facebook page that Stretton's allegations were untrue.

"Like I've been saying, this woman loves to play chess, and I knew she would come up with something. It's just sad and really breaks my heart," he said.

Marcella Bracamonte told ABC News' "Good Morning America" the nanny had told the family's attorney she plans to leave by July 4, and California media have reported that Stretton appeared to now be living out of her car.

The family had earlier said the woman threatened to sue them for wrongful termination and elder abuse. Police declined to intervene in a civil matter, so the couple launched an eviction process, which they feared could take months.

Police say that once a person establishes residency they must be "formally evicted" under California law, a process that could lead to a court-ordered "forcible eviction" carried out by county sheriff's deputies.
 
Man thats a horrible situation.

"I am scared that she is going to poison our food, that's why we lock our fridge," Bracamonte said. "I am scared that one day I will come home and I will be locked out of my house. I am scared because her room is right across from my kids. I am scared because she knows the law so well. I am scared that, in this whole fiasco, we are going to get hurt."

Says it all, what a nightmare that must be.
 
Man thats a horrible situation.

Says it all, what a nightmare that must be.

I hope it is obvious that in many situations tenants should be protected from simply being thrown out into the street. Tenants usually have very few legal rights compared to landlords. I look at this from both sides, 1 of my closest friends is an apartment manager & I certainly do not mean to imply the tenant is never wrong. But when it comes to someone living in your house with you, the priority should be protecting the homeowner & the homeowner's family & property.
 
I understand from both points too, but people sure do take advantage of the system.

I will never understand why problems like this are let, considering how dangerous people can be to each other, if i was the police i would step in and sort it out.
 
I understand from both points too, but people sure do take advantage of the system.

Including landlords.

I will never understand why problems like this are let, considering how dangerous people can be to each other, if i was the police i would step in and sort it out.

Supposedly, the police cannot. Tho it seems to me to be some serious crime just waiting to happen.
 
Back
Top