So, i'm going to spill all my darkest thoughts on the quantum world of physics
My View on Quantum Mechanics
There is so many problems with the big bang. Parallel Universes can answer for this, but each of those universes have the problem of where energy came from. It simply comes out of the nothingness, and the big bang does not merit any pre-existence, from a relativistic viewpoint. But relativity is a classical theory, in that it doesn’t take into account the uncertainty principle.
But if you do, theories can emerge that could potentially answer for some kind of quantum answer to where the energy we observe today came from t-1 seconds of Big Bang. I’ve known for a while that it has been widely accepted in a parallel universe model, that some universes will be in excited states that will inexorably spill their energies over time.
With this in mind, I asked, ‘’what about a finite collection of universes spilling energy equally so it reaches the original branch, in a closed-timelike-path, and continue this process of sinusoidal movements into infinity?’’
For the energy to be caught up in some closed-timelike-path would allow the energy to reach the original branch as fast as it had left, in fact, simultaneous. But to do this, as I mentioned, we needed to allow the uncertainty principle run the game, and even introduce quantum tunneling, because there was one major paradox.
For it to successfully flow between all the universes, only $$10^{100}$$ is needed, it would need to follow a constant pattern of a flow from an excited state universe to a ground, and back again, because if it didn’t follow this accordingly, it wouldn’t work.
Chronological- Set Principle
A law which the wave function in the Big Flow Theory, inherent in all matter is described as being a set of statistical outcomes that will be determined amount of universes that will use any of these probabilities. By this standard, the outcomes or probabilities when played out in any one universe, are set in self-contained time, and must abide by a chronological order in time. In other words, each universe when a particles path is determined, it is determined in another universe in a different eigenstate. But the Chronological-Set Principle states that there be two essential conditions:
1. That there is a finite amount of universes.
2. And that each universe be self-contained and having self-contained time
The reason why we need value two is because the Big Flow Theory is in fact a Closed-Timelike Theory, so that it acts analogous to a particle experiencing a closed-timelike-path. This means, it doesn’t matter which universe is currently active with energy, they are totally self-contained, and when in reference to each other, each universe has an energy present and doesn’t simultaneously.
So how do we envision this? Is energy being distributed evenly along a finite set of universes or not? Because for value two to work, there is no determination between one universe to another, so that they can operate accordingly as a closed-timelike theory. So this is in conflict with having any notion of ‘’flow’’ in the theory. The only way to explain how this is allowed, is by allowing the uncertainty principle run the show in imaginary time. We certainly can’t allow any of this in real time, because it simply wouldn’t work.
Value one also holds a few notions to account for. In this theory, $$10^100$$ universes are suffice to account for the flow, so long as there is an equal distribution of excited and ground state universes. But there is a problem, a paradox if you wish, because the theory needs each universe to be distributed along in a continuous pattern that is from excited state, to ground state… but the conditions in both states of the universes would be uniquely different.
If a universe begins in a ground state, it has no singularity, and no unique structure or radius. And how can it have a unique energy? Instead of a singularity at its imaginary center and no unique point, it would have a topological opening, a wormhole.
For an excited state universe, it is very volatile over time, and will eventually spill all of its energy, but if both the states of universes are distributed evenly, so that the energy flows from an excited state into a ground state, then how does the ground state universe spill its energy? The answer is it doesn’t. The process for the energy in this instance is through tunneling, by applying this in imaginary time, or real space. By using the uncertainty principle, you can allow particles to tunnel through barriers. Hawking uses them frequently in allowing particles to tunnel through the gravitational surface of a black hole. The energy would then quite literally, ‘’tunnel’’ through into another universe, ‘’squeezed’’ out of current spacetime and growing into another.
This would continue on and on, around the universes until it finally reached the original branch, in a ‘’super-closed-timelike path.’’ This way, energy has an explanation to its origin. The big bang cannot tackle such a question so many physicists have in protest against the theory stated the energy came from nowhere, to show how absurd it really is, because how can something come from nothing, because relativity states before big bang, there was absolutely noting. Somehow, nothing was actually something, and the Big Flow Theory tackles this by saying the energy returns back to its original starting point as fast as it left the universe acting forever in a sinusoidal movement, due to the infinite nature of the wave function of matter.
So there is not an infinite amount of universes, but each universe continues to have an infinite amount beginnings and ends. Even though I have no where near the mathematical knowledge to even put this down into some calculative thesis, I know by modern physics this theory is completely possible. One problem though, there is absolutely no way to prove this. It’s in the realm of other interpretations to overthrow big bang like Ekpyrotic Theory working in 5-branes that are totally un-experimental, even its counterpart and foundation of string theory. We simply don’t have the technology to fathom the truth, we can only speculate, and bring forward theories.
My Thoughts on Observer-Dependency
The universe must be to some extent, observer-dependant. Existence as we know it, is nothing more than how we perceive through the five senses. This is reality, since it is the only existence of reality we ever come to know. If this is the definition of existence is perception alone, then what kind of universe would exist without the observer?
This is arguably not only an ontologically-based principle, but also a metaphysical interpretation. But we also add to reality detail which is unique. Simple decoherence doesn’t transmit the kind of information into the world like humans do. In a single day we can have up to 6 million thoughts, and observe over 6 billion frames of images, and these build reality up, because it is sending signals into the universe, like waves of information.
The world of matter seems to come alive in the perception of the mind. Just the way we use photons to ‘hit’ down the location of another particle, the observer ‘hits’ reality by measuring it, we bring the world into view of our perceptions which is very holographic in nature. Somehow, reality is cast into the three-dimensional phenomena, much like a holographic image from a two-dimensional medium.
But more to this, is that the mind doesn’t exist in space like a photon does, but has unique connections to time. The reality of the mind, cannot exist in any real function of time though. Any notion of time we might come to consider about the mind, must be treated as a second time dimension. This would have unique qualities for the propagation of psychophysical studies.
The first is relative and cosmological time, given by $$t$$. This describes the time that existed before the mind was ever present, which didn’t account for much without the mind. Then there is the ‘’asymptotic time’’ we all experience, described by the $$T$$: This is a subliminal time experience and dimension. $$t$$ could in fact be described as a relative time dimension, and the $$T$$ as an absolute time dimension. This would help explain some strange properties of the mind.
$$a^{2}+b^{2}+c^{2}+tdi^{2}-Tdi^{2}$$
Let $$i^{2}=i *k^{2}$$
Then the real part would be
$$a^{2}+b^{2}+c^{2}-i^{2}*k^{2}^{2} = 0$$
which simplifies to:
$$a^{2}+ b^{2}+c^{2}+ k2^{2}=0$$
The only solution is $$a=b=c=k^{2}=0$$
By having a static time dimension for the mind and mind alone, it may act upon the psyche in such a way that we feel as though time is always within our reach. Indeed, we already have notions that make us feel like this. The future is somehow a time which we can’t remember.
You see, forward directional awareness would mean that we could move from one state to another. Because of this process, we would be able to distinguish a path before. If this pattern is unchanged, then we would be able to create a past time before us, and a continuous path of future before us. Our future exists as a time we cannot remember, but to us, it feels as though we can 'jump' into the future and write a particular path we might take. I ask, is this the work of the shadow of some particular static time dimension?
However, the only real time we experience is the present time. This must mean that both the past and the future are a collection of statistical probable outcomes: making both the past and the future totally virtual. Now, even though these are all laws, totally within the boundaries of physics, they can be violated.
They can be violated if the mind collects information about the future and is simultaneously aware of it. Obviously, this would be a premonition of the future. This is us remembering a time which has not yet come to pass - which seems illogical when anyone comes to reconcile this phenomena, because, how can we remember something we have never experienced?
I believe we can do so, because all-information exists potentially within our beings. And because we have all-information existing within us in a dormant state, and also because our minds can defy certain rules and principles, such as indeterminism, we might be able to defy temporal processes of knowledge, not working in a continuous frame. Instead, from time-to-time, the mind can jump into the future and anticipate an outcome by making it 'real', and i think this collapse ensures that this is the specific way into the most probable future.
Even though we sense the psychological arrow of time as going in one direction (I call this 'linear knowledge'), it would still be best to imagine it as being non-linear. Whether or not it may seem to have a directionality about it, it is existing in a world in which it encapsulates its field on four dimensional freedom. Thus, real time is like a squiggly surface, usually portrayed as being the surface of an expanding balloon; thus the time we sense is an illusion, but is in opposition, an extremely valuable way to distinguish the evolution of time, including it's boundaries of past, present and future.
The Three Laws of Time Evolution (Expectant, Uncertain and Certainty)
The Pathology and Arrangement of Knowledge –
-- is probably one of my most better achievments in making a model for consciousness.
There are three main principles, that worked differential roles against the flow of time. It highlights possible relations with the uncertainty principle in a whole, and explains why nothing at the subatomic level can be applied to mere cause and effect. In principle, they explain why we have the knowledge we have… the qualia of existence… the fountain of matter and energy, and even the ethereal mixture of consciousness. If we exist in the present time, the only ever real time, then the past, according to both the expectancy and certainty role, combined with uncertainty, says that the past is:
1. The past is ruled by certain and UNCERTAIN rules.
This means that we can be certain about past events, but we can also be uncertain, as a past event could and does hold incomplete knowledge from time-to-time. During the present, we don’t tend to ‘’expect’’ anything from the past, so it doesn’t play a role.
The rules in the present are all functional:
2. We can be certain, UNCERTAIN, and expect outcomes during the present time.
Here, we can see that we can be certain of the present, and also be uncertain of it. So many examples could be said to how we could be uncertain during the present time: It might occur very frequent in your life… and we expect more during the present… If mind is time, and time is mind, then we always expect more… a future, this is what we always expect.
Then the future has aligned for it:
3. We can be UNCERTAIN about the future and we can be Expectant of it.
It seems that axiom no.3 is the only principled axiom that cannot allow any certainty. Uncertainty forbids this… which is strange, because the past is not effected by such a conduct. There, certainty and uncertainty arise side-by-side, and this is caused by Entropy of knowledge, which I called in my last book, ‘’linear knowledge,’’ meaning that knowledge has a linear realization to the human being. It presents itself, and unfolds its memory to us as the arrow of times shows us a directionality to that unfolding. In fact, since there is no arrow representing this, instead of some interpretations of the ‘Psychological Arrow of Time’, I shall call the ‘Informational Arrow of Time,’ to represent the linear nature of human knowledge. It’s more specific.
So here we have it. The rules of consciousness has just been displayed out according to the boundaries of living in the present.
This can all be linked to the Binding Principle of Neurophysics, since the mind is binding time together with knowledge. The Binding Problem can be answered for though, as I have explained, I think everything is predetermined. Because of this, space and time has a memory. We seem to ‘’seep’’ out of this memory, out of space and time, and it created this thing we call consciousness. No other configuration could perform this work, and has stunning probabilistic arguments for the Anthropic Principle of QM.
From Big Bang… My questions, my thoughts…
It began with a tremendous spill of energy and gas...
… energy and gas...
The universe grew quite old before any energy appeared in the cosmos, but the universe at this time was extremely hot, though, it wasn't until this 'gas of light' began to cool down, and it broke into the most basic fundamental particles known: The proton, the neutron and the electron. Then came helium, and the birth of stars had integrated... and their mass' contained just around 1% of all of the space it was an inhabitant of. This was indeed a miraculous time...
Then, over millions of years, certain stars began to collapse, and become supernovae. These massive bright stars then shrank down to the size of any average-sized large planet, leaving behind the massive ''spit'' of mass around it. This mass slowly formated into the first planets and asteroids, due to their attractive forces (namely gravity) and a slow process called secretion.
8 billion-odd years on, and the universe was still a violent place. Our galaxy was still formating; hence our planet had not formed, and was still gathering up the star-dust, like some massive snowball. A further 2 billion years later, collisions from near asteroid impacts would have gradually calmed down, and for the first time, life, in its simplest form, which are Prokaryotes - single celled life.
Then Eukaryotes came about, multi-cellular life, and it was just about this time, the earth came under a massive extinction. Millions of years passed, until the first plant life and insects emerged, only to be wiped out by a second great extinction.
Plants insisted to have their place on earth, then there was evolving, insects... though they where wiped out in a third and forth mass extinction. Then reptiles became independent of the sea, along with the first birds and mammals, though, again, to be wiped out by a fifth great extinction. Then, only 100,000 years ago, man... homosapians appear.
It all came from a single cell, and since then we have been a tireless force against nature. Who or what ignited that original spark? Who or what shocked the first organic materials of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-based life into living things that made the sea roar?
These questions are tackled by science… the age old questions which religion and metaphysics tackled first, but somehow science tends to shy away from such questions now. Why? Because they are questions too difficult to answer, especially when they move into realms which cannot be experimented on.
If this was the main case, then the secret policies of physics have been lying to us from the beginning, because there is no way we can experimentally test half of our theories, because they involve the universe on scales we can never reach. So to save us from insanity, we continue to look up to the sky, and believe there is something out there… an answer. A revelation, telling us that this strange aloof, and yet darkened stage of the universe will eventually spill its secrets.
My View on Quantum Mechanics
There is so many problems with the big bang. Parallel Universes can answer for this, but each of those universes have the problem of where energy came from. It simply comes out of the nothingness, and the big bang does not merit any pre-existence, from a relativistic viewpoint. But relativity is a classical theory, in that it doesn’t take into account the uncertainty principle.
But if you do, theories can emerge that could potentially answer for some kind of quantum answer to where the energy we observe today came from t-1 seconds of Big Bang. I’ve known for a while that it has been widely accepted in a parallel universe model, that some universes will be in excited states that will inexorably spill their energies over time.
With this in mind, I asked, ‘’what about a finite collection of universes spilling energy equally so it reaches the original branch, in a closed-timelike-path, and continue this process of sinusoidal movements into infinity?’’
For the energy to be caught up in some closed-timelike-path would allow the energy to reach the original branch as fast as it had left, in fact, simultaneous. But to do this, as I mentioned, we needed to allow the uncertainty principle run the game, and even introduce quantum tunneling, because there was one major paradox.
For it to successfully flow between all the universes, only $$10^{100}$$ is needed, it would need to follow a constant pattern of a flow from an excited state universe to a ground, and back again, because if it didn’t follow this accordingly, it wouldn’t work.
Chronological- Set Principle
A law which the wave function in the Big Flow Theory, inherent in all matter is described as being a set of statistical outcomes that will be determined amount of universes that will use any of these probabilities. By this standard, the outcomes or probabilities when played out in any one universe, are set in self-contained time, and must abide by a chronological order in time. In other words, each universe when a particles path is determined, it is determined in another universe in a different eigenstate. But the Chronological-Set Principle states that there be two essential conditions:
1. That there is a finite amount of universes.
2. And that each universe be self-contained and having self-contained time
The reason why we need value two is because the Big Flow Theory is in fact a Closed-Timelike Theory, so that it acts analogous to a particle experiencing a closed-timelike-path. This means, it doesn’t matter which universe is currently active with energy, they are totally self-contained, and when in reference to each other, each universe has an energy present and doesn’t simultaneously.
So how do we envision this? Is energy being distributed evenly along a finite set of universes or not? Because for value two to work, there is no determination between one universe to another, so that they can operate accordingly as a closed-timelike theory. So this is in conflict with having any notion of ‘’flow’’ in the theory. The only way to explain how this is allowed, is by allowing the uncertainty principle run the show in imaginary time. We certainly can’t allow any of this in real time, because it simply wouldn’t work.
Value one also holds a few notions to account for. In this theory, $$10^100$$ universes are suffice to account for the flow, so long as there is an equal distribution of excited and ground state universes. But there is a problem, a paradox if you wish, because the theory needs each universe to be distributed along in a continuous pattern that is from excited state, to ground state… but the conditions in both states of the universes would be uniquely different.
If a universe begins in a ground state, it has no singularity, and no unique structure or radius. And how can it have a unique energy? Instead of a singularity at its imaginary center and no unique point, it would have a topological opening, a wormhole.
For an excited state universe, it is very volatile over time, and will eventually spill all of its energy, but if both the states of universes are distributed evenly, so that the energy flows from an excited state into a ground state, then how does the ground state universe spill its energy? The answer is it doesn’t. The process for the energy in this instance is through tunneling, by applying this in imaginary time, or real space. By using the uncertainty principle, you can allow particles to tunnel through barriers. Hawking uses them frequently in allowing particles to tunnel through the gravitational surface of a black hole. The energy would then quite literally, ‘’tunnel’’ through into another universe, ‘’squeezed’’ out of current spacetime and growing into another.
This would continue on and on, around the universes until it finally reached the original branch, in a ‘’super-closed-timelike path.’’ This way, energy has an explanation to its origin. The big bang cannot tackle such a question so many physicists have in protest against the theory stated the energy came from nowhere, to show how absurd it really is, because how can something come from nothing, because relativity states before big bang, there was absolutely noting. Somehow, nothing was actually something, and the Big Flow Theory tackles this by saying the energy returns back to its original starting point as fast as it left the universe acting forever in a sinusoidal movement, due to the infinite nature of the wave function of matter.
So there is not an infinite amount of universes, but each universe continues to have an infinite amount beginnings and ends. Even though I have no where near the mathematical knowledge to even put this down into some calculative thesis, I know by modern physics this theory is completely possible. One problem though, there is absolutely no way to prove this. It’s in the realm of other interpretations to overthrow big bang like Ekpyrotic Theory working in 5-branes that are totally un-experimental, even its counterpart and foundation of string theory. We simply don’t have the technology to fathom the truth, we can only speculate, and bring forward theories.
My Thoughts on Observer-Dependency
The universe must be to some extent, observer-dependant. Existence as we know it, is nothing more than how we perceive through the five senses. This is reality, since it is the only existence of reality we ever come to know. If this is the definition of existence is perception alone, then what kind of universe would exist without the observer?
This is arguably not only an ontologically-based principle, but also a metaphysical interpretation. But we also add to reality detail which is unique. Simple decoherence doesn’t transmit the kind of information into the world like humans do. In a single day we can have up to 6 million thoughts, and observe over 6 billion frames of images, and these build reality up, because it is sending signals into the universe, like waves of information.
The world of matter seems to come alive in the perception of the mind. Just the way we use photons to ‘hit’ down the location of another particle, the observer ‘hits’ reality by measuring it, we bring the world into view of our perceptions which is very holographic in nature. Somehow, reality is cast into the three-dimensional phenomena, much like a holographic image from a two-dimensional medium.
But more to this, is that the mind doesn’t exist in space like a photon does, but has unique connections to time. The reality of the mind, cannot exist in any real function of time though. Any notion of time we might come to consider about the mind, must be treated as a second time dimension. This would have unique qualities for the propagation of psychophysical studies.
The first is relative and cosmological time, given by $$t$$. This describes the time that existed before the mind was ever present, which didn’t account for much without the mind. Then there is the ‘’asymptotic time’’ we all experience, described by the $$T$$: This is a subliminal time experience and dimension. $$t$$ could in fact be described as a relative time dimension, and the $$T$$ as an absolute time dimension. This would help explain some strange properties of the mind.
$$a^{2}+b^{2}+c^{2}+tdi^{2}-Tdi^{2}$$
Let $$i^{2}=i *k^{2}$$
Then the real part would be
$$a^{2}+b^{2}+c^{2}-i^{2}*k^{2}^{2} = 0$$
which simplifies to:
$$a^{2}+ b^{2}+c^{2}+ k2^{2}=0$$
The only solution is $$a=b=c=k^{2}=0$$
By having a static time dimension for the mind and mind alone, it may act upon the psyche in such a way that we feel as though time is always within our reach. Indeed, we already have notions that make us feel like this. The future is somehow a time which we can’t remember.
You see, forward directional awareness would mean that we could move from one state to another. Because of this process, we would be able to distinguish a path before. If this pattern is unchanged, then we would be able to create a past time before us, and a continuous path of future before us. Our future exists as a time we cannot remember, but to us, it feels as though we can 'jump' into the future and write a particular path we might take. I ask, is this the work of the shadow of some particular static time dimension?
However, the only real time we experience is the present time. This must mean that both the past and the future are a collection of statistical probable outcomes: making both the past and the future totally virtual. Now, even though these are all laws, totally within the boundaries of physics, they can be violated.
They can be violated if the mind collects information about the future and is simultaneously aware of it. Obviously, this would be a premonition of the future. This is us remembering a time which has not yet come to pass - which seems illogical when anyone comes to reconcile this phenomena, because, how can we remember something we have never experienced?
I believe we can do so, because all-information exists potentially within our beings. And because we have all-information existing within us in a dormant state, and also because our minds can defy certain rules and principles, such as indeterminism, we might be able to defy temporal processes of knowledge, not working in a continuous frame. Instead, from time-to-time, the mind can jump into the future and anticipate an outcome by making it 'real', and i think this collapse ensures that this is the specific way into the most probable future.
Even though we sense the psychological arrow of time as going in one direction (I call this 'linear knowledge'), it would still be best to imagine it as being non-linear. Whether or not it may seem to have a directionality about it, it is existing in a world in which it encapsulates its field on four dimensional freedom. Thus, real time is like a squiggly surface, usually portrayed as being the surface of an expanding balloon; thus the time we sense is an illusion, but is in opposition, an extremely valuable way to distinguish the evolution of time, including it's boundaries of past, present and future.
The Three Laws of Time Evolution (Expectant, Uncertain and Certainty)
The Pathology and Arrangement of Knowledge –
-- is probably one of my most better achievments in making a model for consciousness.
There are three main principles, that worked differential roles against the flow of time. It highlights possible relations with the uncertainty principle in a whole, and explains why nothing at the subatomic level can be applied to mere cause and effect. In principle, they explain why we have the knowledge we have… the qualia of existence… the fountain of matter and energy, and even the ethereal mixture of consciousness. If we exist in the present time, the only ever real time, then the past, according to both the expectancy and certainty role, combined with uncertainty, says that the past is:
1. The past is ruled by certain and UNCERTAIN rules.
This means that we can be certain about past events, but we can also be uncertain, as a past event could and does hold incomplete knowledge from time-to-time. During the present, we don’t tend to ‘’expect’’ anything from the past, so it doesn’t play a role.
The rules in the present are all functional:
2. We can be certain, UNCERTAIN, and expect outcomes during the present time.
Here, we can see that we can be certain of the present, and also be uncertain of it. So many examples could be said to how we could be uncertain during the present time: It might occur very frequent in your life… and we expect more during the present… If mind is time, and time is mind, then we always expect more… a future, this is what we always expect.
Then the future has aligned for it:
3. We can be UNCERTAIN about the future and we can be Expectant of it.
It seems that axiom no.3 is the only principled axiom that cannot allow any certainty. Uncertainty forbids this… which is strange, because the past is not effected by such a conduct. There, certainty and uncertainty arise side-by-side, and this is caused by Entropy of knowledge, which I called in my last book, ‘’linear knowledge,’’ meaning that knowledge has a linear realization to the human being. It presents itself, and unfolds its memory to us as the arrow of times shows us a directionality to that unfolding. In fact, since there is no arrow representing this, instead of some interpretations of the ‘Psychological Arrow of Time’, I shall call the ‘Informational Arrow of Time,’ to represent the linear nature of human knowledge. It’s more specific.
So here we have it. The rules of consciousness has just been displayed out according to the boundaries of living in the present.
This can all be linked to the Binding Principle of Neurophysics, since the mind is binding time together with knowledge. The Binding Problem can be answered for though, as I have explained, I think everything is predetermined. Because of this, space and time has a memory. We seem to ‘’seep’’ out of this memory, out of space and time, and it created this thing we call consciousness. No other configuration could perform this work, and has stunning probabilistic arguments for the Anthropic Principle of QM.
From Big Bang… My questions, my thoughts…
It began with a tremendous spill of energy and gas...
… energy and gas...
The universe grew quite old before any energy appeared in the cosmos, but the universe at this time was extremely hot, though, it wasn't until this 'gas of light' began to cool down, and it broke into the most basic fundamental particles known: The proton, the neutron and the electron. Then came helium, and the birth of stars had integrated... and their mass' contained just around 1% of all of the space it was an inhabitant of. This was indeed a miraculous time...
Then, over millions of years, certain stars began to collapse, and become supernovae. These massive bright stars then shrank down to the size of any average-sized large planet, leaving behind the massive ''spit'' of mass around it. This mass slowly formated into the first planets and asteroids, due to their attractive forces (namely gravity) and a slow process called secretion.
8 billion-odd years on, and the universe was still a violent place. Our galaxy was still formating; hence our planet had not formed, and was still gathering up the star-dust, like some massive snowball. A further 2 billion years later, collisions from near asteroid impacts would have gradually calmed down, and for the first time, life, in its simplest form, which are Prokaryotes - single celled life.
Then Eukaryotes came about, multi-cellular life, and it was just about this time, the earth came under a massive extinction. Millions of years passed, until the first plant life and insects emerged, only to be wiped out by a second great extinction.
Plants insisted to have their place on earth, then there was evolving, insects... though they where wiped out in a third and forth mass extinction. Then reptiles became independent of the sea, along with the first birds and mammals, though, again, to be wiped out by a fifth great extinction. Then, only 100,000 years ago, man... homosapians appear.
It all came from a single cell, and since then we have been a tireless force against nature. Who or what ignited that original spark? Who or what shocked the first organic materials of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-based life into living things that made the sea roar?
These questions are tackled by science… the age old questions which religion and metaphysics tackled first, but somehow science tends to shy away from such questions now. Why? Because they are questions too difficult to answer, especially when they move into realms which cannot be experimented on.
If this was the main case, then the secret policies of physics have been lying to us from the beginning, because there is no way we can experimentally test half of our theories, because they involve the universe on scales we can never reach. So to save us from insanity, we continue to look up to the sky, and believe there is something out there… an answer. A revelation, telling us that this strange aloof, and yet darkened stage of the universe will eventually spill its secrets.
Last edited: