btimsah - re your latest suite of anomalous photos:
Let's try one more time. There seem to me two possibilities:
1. You genuinely wish to convince people that there is something anomalous in these pictures that is worthy of further investigation.
2. You are jerking our chain; indulging in some personal fantasy; are on an extended, drug induced sensory overload; or some combination of the above.
There is no reasonable action we can take if it is the latter, so I shall assume it is the former. If you wish people to take a serious interest in your material then you have to be more precise, more scientific in what you are presenting. Several individuals, most recently Silas and phlogistician, have requested this before. May I ask why you persist in not providing such information?
If you provided these following data for each photo you presented then it would a) reveal that you understood the importance of proper documentation, b) encourage readers to take a less dismissive view of your submissions.
Where on the lunar surface is each photograph located?
(Latitude and Longitude; named location, e.g. north west edge of Mare Serenatis)
Smaller scale photograph, showing location of frame in broader context
What is the scale of the photograph?
Date and time of photograph.
Orientation of photograph.
Source of photograph - i.e. Which spacecraft (This is the only information you provided for these photographs)
URL of source (On this point, frankly I am pretty offended. You can't go around quoting books, internet sites, scientific papers, etc without providing sufficient information to allow others to verify what you are saying. That is fundamental to good science. This thread may be in the pseudoscience section, but if point 1 above is your true motive, then you presumably would like to see it eventually upgraded to the science section. In which case, stop insulting us by failure to provide proper references. It may be that you were unaware how offensive this is. You know now. Please don't repeat the lapse.)
Picture 2 is the first anomalous picture you have shown us. It is actually interesting. I find it peculiar and am not sure what to make of it. If I had the information outlined above it would be much easier to proceed with a sensible analysis.
There are two things I noticed about the picture:
The sharpness of the central ‘object’ compared with all the other photos, makes this appear as if it has been manipulated by a photo editing program.
There is a coloured ‘sheen’ concentrated on the highlights of the ‘object’. This is reminiscent of the effect one sees on 3-D photos.
Btimsah, please note I am not drawing any conclusions from these two points, nor formulating any hypotheses. I am simply making observations, the starting point of good science. However, any explanation of this anomalous photo would have to account for these two observations.