Muslim Prez, Sikh PM, Christian Power Center: It happens only in India?!

Huh? How can it NOT be relevant? Are you saying/implying that bribery and corruption is okay in a government? And with such bribery and corruption, the national government of India can still be a great and wonderful government?????

Baron Max

Please indicate what bribery and corruption were involved in the election of a Muslim president, a Sikh Prime Minister and an Italian Christian Indian National Congress President in a country where more than 70% of the people are of the Hindu dharma.:confused:
 
What's the murder rate in Mumbai? And the rape rate? I suppose it would also be nice to know the conviction rates for those crimes, too.

Baron Max

What does the crime rate in Mumbai have to do with the secular nature of the people? Are you saying being a religious but secular country increases the rate of crime?:p

The crime rate in Mumbai is horrible, horrible! Every street corner is filled with people who tote guns and shoot down Texans just for kicks. Sometimes they even torture them by making them use the public transport full of sweaty smelly people of color!!! Thats what makes it the most popular destination in India too!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D
 
What does the crime rate in Mumbai have to do with the secular nature of the people?

I think the crime rates show a good indication of how well the general population views the basic government of the cities and nation. If the laws and the courts are fair and just, people tend to side strongly with the government and police, thus are also helpful in fighting crime. With the whole city population watching and caring, the crime rates are always low.

So .....whats the murder and rape rates in Mumbai? And what's the conviction rates for those crimes?

Baron Max
 
I think the crime rates show a good indication of how well the general population views the basic government of the cities and nation. If the laws and the courts are fair and just, people tend to side strongly with the government and police, thus are also helpful in fighting crime. With the whole city population watching and caring, the crime rates are always low.

So .....whats the murder and rape rates in Mumbai? And what's the conviction rates for those crimes?

Baron Max

Huh? You're speaking from a perspective of a rich country. India still has a large poor population. Crime and justice are important, but getting food on the table, an affordable education and healthcare, civic amenities and a job to pay for all these things is a little higher on the scale.

Rape and murder in Bombay? I honestly don't know, no idea if there are statistics online either. But its a city with an active night life and women travel alone at all hours, so its considered pretty safe. I do it myself all the time without a second thought. Do people get raped robbed and murdered? Of course, its the most popular destination for locals and tourists and anyone who wants to have a better life without leaving the country. The population is overwhelming.

The cops in Mumbai are the best in India. Our C.I.D. has been compared to Scotland Yard for their investigative abilities. The judiciary is still swamped and justice is slow, so we need extensive reforms there.

edit: I found a newspaper report. Mumbai contributes to 10% of urban crime in India with a conviction rate between 45 to 68%.
 
The reason I said it was because its obvious that a Roman Catholic woman could not possibly be elected in a country of Muslims and Hindus. A Sikh, I can understand, a Muslim, I can understand, but a Christian?

There must have been some bribery involved.

I don't have the statistics, and I'm wasn't very serious about that post, but it seems to me that a Hindu country would elect Hindu leaders.
 
The reason I said it was because its obvious that a Roman Catholic woman could not possibly be elected in a country of Muslims and Hindus. A Sikh, I can understand, a Muslim, I can understand, but a Christian?

There must have been some bribery involved.

I don't have the statistics, and I'm wasn't very serious about that post, but it seems to me that a Hindu country would elect Hindu leaders.

Haven't you lived in India? Whoever thinks of religion during elections? Even the success of the BJP was a reflection of the failure of the Congress, i.e. to punish the Congress for their ineptitude rather than reward the BJP.

The first time the BJP won a majority,it was in 1996 (almost 50 years after independence when Congress was at an all time low) and it was forced to resign in 13 months. The second time they formed a coalition in order to be able to form a government, which again fell apart due to internal squabbles in one year. The third time, they put their fundamentalist leanings on a back burner and promoted themselves as nation builders with Vajpayee a known moderate as the fielded Prime Minister; he began to work for the country, improving relations with Pakistan. But the Gujarat riots in 2002 and the Tehelka scam of 2000 was all it was needed for the people to decide that fundamentalism is not for India. And they suffered a crushing defeat in 2004 (the same year Sonia took charge of the Congress), because the people want a government that functions and builds, not divides and destroys.

And even the BJP which is such a strongly conservative Hindu party has this view:
The BJP is a religious conservative political organisation. It sees itself as rising to the defence of indigenous culture, and Indian religious systems which include Hinduism, Jainism, Sikhism and Buddhism. To many Hindu nationalists, Bharat is a Hindu Rashtra, literally a Hindu nation.

According to BJP, this definition does not exclude Muslims, Christians. Hindu Rashtra is portrayed as cultural nationalism and Hinduism as the entire complex system of culture, history, faith and worship that have evolved in India over the past 5,000 years. In the political language of Hindu nationalists, all the peoples of India, their cultures and heritage are "Hindu," which literally means "inhabitant of the land of the river Sindhu," the modern-day Indus.

Absolutely.

Anyway I think its good to have several ideologies turn by turn. Keeps everyone on their toes.
 
Last edited:
Rape and murder in Bombay? I honestly don't know, no idea if there are statistics online either.

Had I asked about the number of police tazer incidents in, say, Detroit, you could have dug up about a gazillion websites with a gazillion incidents to "prove" that America and American cops are vicious, nasty, deadly, horrid creatures. But for something simple like the crime stats in Bombay, you can't find a thing?? ...LOL!!

The cops in Mumbai are the best in India. Our C.I.D. has been compared to Scotland Yard for their investigative abilities.

And probably there have never, ever, been any citizen complaints about police corruption or police brutality or police using deadly force, right? And they probably don't carry weapons, and the criminals stop immediately when the cops tell them to, right?

edit: I found a newspaper report. Mumbai contributes to 10% of urban crime in India with a conviction rate between 45 to 68%.

Very good, Sam! Now ...10% of what??? ...LOL!

Since India is such a paradise of human goodwill and charity and compassion and love for all mankind, then my guess would be that there's ....oh, say, 10 tiny little crimes in all of India? So Bombay has 1 crime? :D

No warts on India ...but you can find warts all over America, can't you? And you do it on a regular basis. But it seems that it's a bit more difficult to see and talk about ones own warts, ain't it?

Baron Max
 
Had I asked about the number of police tazer incidents in, say, Detroit, you could have dug up about a gazillion websites with a gazillion incidents to "prove" that America and American cops are vicious, nasty, deadly, horrid creatures. But for something simple like the crime stats in Bombay, you can't find a thing?? ...LOL!!

Nope I can't! :(
I wish they'd put everything online, they are too understaffed and under funded though, so its not gonna happen soon. But if you can find any, I'll be happy to discuss them. It would be nice to get an input on what changes would be helpful. We still have some laws on paper that are terribly outdated.

And probably there have never, ever, been any citizen complaints about police corruption or police brutality or police using deadly force, right? And they probably don't carry weapons, and the criminals stop immediately when the cops tell them to, right?

Actually there have. Police brutality is one of the issues in Indian justice that need to be addressed. Where on the one hand we have policemen who conduct "encounters" to get rid of known criminals (a form of vigilantism that receives a lot of bad press) on the other hand we also have cops who fight for the right of prisoners to be given condoms to protect themselves from AIDS, acknowledging that men are as prone to rape in prison and deserve the choice of being able to protect themselves from disease.

Very good, Sam! Now ...10% of what??? ...LOL!

Lucky you, I found it out, its 177 per 100,000, which considering a population of 12-15 million is a lot of crime.


Since India is such a paradise of human goodwill and charity and compassion and love for all mankind, then my guess would be that there's ....oh, say, 10 tiny little crimes in all of India? So Bombay has 1 crime?

Don't be fooled. A British tourist who accosted a woman was beaten to death by her husband last week. Its not all milk and honey.:)

No warts on India ...but you can find warts all over America, can't you? And you do it on a regular basis. But it seems that it's a bit more difficult to see and talk about ones own warts, ain't it?

No one's stopping you from finding warts in India are they? I would love to discuss them, if you like.:)
 
sam have you ever been to the UK?

Grrrrr! I spent five and a half hours getting back into the same plane after refueling at Heathrow on New years Eve! Anyone who thinks British security at airports is lax will have their eardrums blasted by my screech. I have made a firm resolution NEVER to go via London again!I am incredibly lucky I was travelling Air India. None of the other air carriers waited and lots of people missed their connections:mad:

On the other hand, I love British literature and culture. So I will definitely visit Britain sometime soon! :)
 
Grrrrr! I spent five and a half hours getting back into the same plane after refueling at Heathrow on New years Eve! Anyone who thinks British security at airports is lax will have their eardrums blasted by my screech. I have made a firm resolution NEVER to go via London again!:mad: :mad: :mad:

Sam, British security first-rate, they brought some tanks down to Heathrow a while back (lol), officials said some terrorists had plans but once they saw the tanks they had a change of heart.

Bwahahahaha - hilarious
 
The reason I said it was because its obvious that a Roman Catholic woman could not possibly be elected in a country of Muslims and Hindus. A Sikh, I can understand, a Muslim, I can understand, but a Christian?

There must have been some bribery involved.

I don't have the statistics, and I'm wasn't very serious about that post, but it seems to me that a Hindu country would elect Hindu leaders.
That is where the difference is, Ayodhya.

Typically you would expect a Hindu majority country would elect Hindu leaders, but doesn't this show peoples' maturity?

You are assuming bribery must have been involved, but this is people vote.
 
Huh? How can it NOT be relevant? Are you saying/implying that bribery and corruption is okay in a government? And with such bribery and corruption, the national government of India can still be a great and wonderful government?????

Baron Max

Well, the topic is about maturity of people in terms of choosing leaders regardless of communal inclinations; and you are merely India-bashing! :D
I faintly see that it is more of samcdkey-bashing!! ;)

On a proportional basis, crime in Mumbai and India in general is much lesser than the West. I have never seen people sitting in street corners with guns, nor have I heard of school children shooting teachers in Mumbai.

Mumbai has a 1/17 th of crime rate of New York:
New York: 3000 crimes per 100,000 people - the lowest in years (http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2002/VitaliyShchupak2.shtml)
Mumbai: 177 per 100,000

And from: http://www.tribuneindia.com/1999/99dec27/edit.htm
Even in barbaric times, crime rates were high; even in very poor countries, crime rates can be low. USA, the rich country, had a prison population of 1.8 million in 1998, that is, one out of 150 Americans. That proportion is expected to worsen considerably in the near future. Yet, the U.S. criminal law is becoming cynically harsher every day. In many States of that country, youngsters need curfew passes to go out of their homes during late evening. This month, Meshelle Locke, a 16-year-old girl, as a joke, made a gun with her thumb and index finger and said “bang” to a fellow student in the classroom. She was suspended from school and barely escaped arrest by the police officers who had visited her following this “incident”. This is part of the “zero-tolerance” approach which is being pushed across USA by many including the President.

BTW, I think crime rate has little to with our topic on election of leaders. :)

Thanks.
 
Well, the topic is about maturity of people in terms of choosing leaders regardless of communal inclinations; and you are merely India-bashing! :D
I faintly see that it is more of samcdkey-bashing!! ;)

On a proportional basis, crime in Mumbai and India in general is much lesser than the West. I have never seen people sitting in street corners with guns, nor have I heard of school children shooting teachers in Mumbai.

Mumbai has a 1/17 th of crime rate of New York:
New York: 3000 crimes per 100,000 people - the lowest in years (http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2002/VitaliyShchupak2.shtml)
Mumbai: 177 per 100,000

And from: http://www.tribuneindia.com/1999/99dec27/edit.htm


BTW, I think crime rate has little to with our topic on election of leaders. :)

Thanks.

Interesting differences in perspective:

Mumbai's crime statistics are alarming: a crime rate of 177 per one lakh population (Delhi, however, tops the list with 385 per one lakh, according to the National Crime Records Bureau, 2003).
New York: 3000 crimes per 100,000 people - the lowest in years
 
The current Indian President is a muslim and is one of the most adored people in the country. There are campaigns currently running to have him in the post for a second term.

CIA has an eye on him, neverthless.
https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/chiefs/chiefs81.html

and do people in India seem to forget easily the many terrorist attacks that happened during his reign? or does that not affect his ratings?

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/07/11/mumbai.blasts/
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapcf/10/29/india.explosion/index.html

of course its ULFA to blame...but president's duty is to protect the citizens...to protect the Indians...how is this justified? :bugeye:
 
Back
Top