I feel that the theory of Morphic Fields should be investigated with more depth. Psychon
Theory suggests that matter arranges itself so that they can cohere to make a single living entity.
The idea is that there is a field responsible for telling particles to come together in a particular arrangement. It seems strange to think of consciousness as a particle, but psychons are thought to mediate consciousness.
DNA shows increadible arrangement. They build the genetic code for every living organism, and we think it is of a particular arrangement. It gives back importance as everything is then somehow predetermined.
The best quantum interpretation for this particle is the De-Broglie Bohm Interpretation which states there is a quantum potential telling particles how to move and behave. This is suggests that a collapse in the wave function has been designated since big bang.
Information quite literally determined existed well before it.
But it also means we have soals. In essense, the theory says that there is a finite amount of consciousness. It doesn't end there. Consciousness is recylced. We might see this in light of consciousness being reborn...
Furthermore, there is the problem how we define the distinction between life and dead matter based on? This distinction also entails a mysterious appearance of consciousness billions of years after 'big bang...'
I decided to develop a theory for this to explain how we became conscious, and what will happen upon death. I also wanted to discribe this as a type of Morphic Field, but instead calling it the biofield of consciousness.
It is best to always start with the simple stuff, then work your way into it.
First, there will be many biofields, according to how many types of liforms there are, how many inhabit the universe, and all life forms that will potentially be coming into reality.
I cannot see there being only one single force for all life. These fields must have a character with memory of space and time capable of creating a single type of life form. Thus i see it more probable that there is one biofield per life form race. One for the dog, one for the human and one for the little green men.
It is a potential field... consisting of virtual particles, like a type of sea. This will be seen in strong light from Dr. Ludvik Bass' idea of one single mind. Before nature has arranged the particles for the correct conditions for life or a particular race of life, the field can permeate all spacetime until it can activate the correct matter, because it would act analogous to the Dirac Sea, which is really the same as the Zero-Point Energy Field.
I believe that this sea of virtual particles transport consciousness through angular momentum... Just like two particles sharing energy through angular momentum. It will use seemingly dead matter to arrange living matter. Consciousness could not be fully defined before it became self-aware.
I believe that we become self-aware through the simple law of self-reflection. For a thing to self-reflect, it must be able to reflect on its own existence somehow. The ability to self-reflect on ones own existence causes us to be physically aware. But in the virtual state, we were not conscious. We were potential energy. This way there is a special correlation between the virtuals particles and the real particles that make us up.
Real matter seems to be a conduit in this theory. Arranged correctly and they would yeild the perfect vessels for life and consciousness. In fact, the field of consciousness may very well be electromagnetic in character. We can imagine this field to have a memory, and it would be seen as effecting matter. I find it interesting that the Zero-Point Energy Field is seen as causing the inertial effect on matter. The field would be seen acting like this, having an effect on matter as it moved through spacetime.
The energy (biofields) would have streamed in from big bang on a set pre-planned course throughout spacetime. The fields would have arose from the vacuum, out of the zero-point energy just as matter did, and flooded spacetime with information.
This is where my theory gets really strange. There are an infinite amount of potantial conscious energy, as opposed to the classical idea that there are a finite number of souls.
I don't beleive there necesserally needs to be a finite amount of souls which quantum leap into new bodies upon death. They could just simply merge back into the potential ether of the biofield for the rest of the universes history, which could be forever. This would mean that each individual truely are unique and individual. I considered that this might violate the principle of least action, but the need of it was more important. Without it, sould are recylced, and i am not so sure of that idea, despite of the claims of people who say they have lived previous lives, but i wouldn't be ready to simply jump into that theory without great cause. I would like to think though that the universe abides by the principle of least action in the case of creating single unique and individual souls than to simple recyling the energy, because then how does one measure how many sould there are and why is there a quota?
We can't even say, ''Well, estimating the time of the universe until we die and measure this time against the rate of human production, because we could potentially use souls for an eternity (if we get smart enough to avoid black holes), and learn how to live in an empty universe. If we have an infinite amount of souls, we might even say that the concept of determinism evaporates. In a finite field, there is an accountable amount of consciousness, making a measurable collective pool.
We can also see thoughts, feelings, emotions and dreams as all being product of some design made for it during big bang. Now, what caused big bang really isn't up for discussion here.
It seem irrelevent. Whilst it may have been caused by a passing brane, or that it simply came from nowhere, it is irrelevent. But it turns out that thoughts are in fact apart of the information contained within the biofield. We are already taught that spacetime has a memory, so this might be how spacetime acts as a mediator for this field. Again, it might be oscillating through the hidden dimensions of space. If it is a baby universe curled up into the 6th dimension of spacetime, we must assume that if it is coming from this universe, the information contained within the field cannot have a special configuration, but instead moving into this universe totally mangled of order.
Thus i tend not to think anything of order can mediate between this universe and Hawking's
Baby Universe Theory. And if Hawking is correct about black hole transportation, then stuff cannot even move between universes anymore. Funny enough though, this also has potential for dismissing the existence of the white hole, as it is supposed to spew out matter that a black holes sucks in.
Dreams, though they have no intuitive order, they have a cosmic order. This will also mean that this information is all contained within the being of a particular creature, in this case, humans. The contending idea is that quantum information moves into the self upon observation. For some reason, i never liked this interpretation. It was vague at best. It would have been so much better to say that information exists within the potential of the soul, or collection of psychons, or even the statistics of biowaves. They could contain a whopping amount of information. They would need to if they had been on a preplanned course throughout history. More interesting is that there needed to be a field for it to have this information. If we collect information from anywhere, it is from this field. And since we are a product of the same field, we must assume it is dormant within the soul, and becomes real upon measurement.
If consciousness has an energy, this energy will be in a ground state; the increase of knowledge is an increase of entropy, and this is show we either (come to remember an outcome), or if you like, (the gaining of knowledge from the outside* - my theory is only a theory after all) - and this all requires the presence of an energy, since energy and time are closely related... In fact, without either, the other would cease to exist, and they work together to arrange a particular formation in life. Since consciousness requires a physical coil to become independent in thought, and since matter is somehow the same thing as its diffused cousin (energy), it's not so difficult to understand that consciousness too requires energy.
An atom will radiate, dissipate or transfer energy - but energy cannot at any time disappear: This is because of the conservation law of matter-energy - the first law of thermodynamics. The energy of consciousness shouldn't be any different to the energy of an atom; its electronic inhabitant, unless of course it defy's logic and quantum reasoning.
The electromagnetic field may well intimately interact with the field of consciousness, as electromagnetic forces carry information and self around the body. Tracking the field of consciousness might be difficult however, because we are not sure what it consists of. It might be however, made up of electromagnetic waves, as found in Biofields within matter.
If 'life' creates this field of consciousness, then we should expect a change in death: The energy of consciousness must 'move out' of the physical coil it once inhabited, and it can only do this by either radiating, dissipating or by transferal. The energy source, or soul of a human being at death, cannot spontaneously flow into the body of another. This has simularistic overtones to the second law of thermodynamics, which states that heat cannot spontaneously flow from one body into a warmer body.
Even though this might be just another fancy way of describing consciousness, we cannot fail to see that if it has an energy, it must follow similar rules to thermodynamics, if it is a physical energy. For a while, i was could not make up my mind whether the energy of consciousness was a factor of a physical field, or a by-product of a virtual field. In any case, i now believe it is both, due to the connections between matter-energy and time-awareness. I am simply applying quantum rules in places not normally considered it can be applied. Also, the second law of thermodynamics would be violated if souls spontaneously moved from one body to another. Another reason why i beleive there is an infinite amount of souls, or potenatial souls.
If conscious energy radiates from the body at the point of death, we might be able to measure this energy, using resonance scanners. If it dissipates, we might be able to measure a weight of difference within the dead corpse - (in fact, this idea has already been used extensively by a Dr. David Jones concerning the physical soul) - and if the energy transfer’s, we would need to ask exactly where it is being emitted from. Some might opt. for the spiritual answer, by involving a process of rebirth - (the co-called afterlife existence).
If the energy of consciousness is not a physical force, it would be very difficult, if not, impossible to suggest thoughts on its nature after death. There would be absolutely no way to tell whether it would abide to the conventional laws of thermodynamics; though, the idea would in itself be consistent with quantum mechanical interpretations, since everything must follow quantum rules. However, as we have seen is that not every cornerstone principle is necessarily ''kept'' by the presence of consciousness, such as David Z. Albert's discovery of 'secret knowledge', which states we can be aware of our own positions and paths simultaneously, defying the classical boundaries of the uncertainty principle - or also known as 'the principle of indeterminism.'
Perhaps one day we might be able to detect the presence of a physical force leaving the body at death > otherwise, then consciousness exist soley a non-physical force, and is bound by the matter in inhabits. Something quite sad and depressing arises from this chain of thought; after all, the idea we continue after death is comforting and reassuring... This is the also described as being a pseudoscienfic theory.
Reiku :m:
:shrug:
Theory suggests that matter arranges itself so that they can cohere to make a single living entity.
The idea is that there is a field responsible for telling particles to come together in a particular arrangement. It seems strange to think of consciousness as a particle, but psychons are thought to mediate consciousness.
DNA shows increadible arrangement. They build the genetic code for every living organism, and we think it is of a particular arrangement. It gives back importance as everything is then somehow predetermined.
The best quantum interpretation for this particle is the De-Broglie Bohm Interpretation which states there is a quantum potential telling particles how to move and behave. This is suggests that a collapse in the wave function has been designated since big bang.
Information quite literally determined existed well before it.
But it also means we have soals. In essense, the theory says that there is a finite amount of consciousness. It doesn't end there. Consciousness is recylced. We might see this in light of consciousness being reborn...
Furthermore, there is the problem how we define the distinction between life and dead matter based on? This distinction also entails a mysterious appearance of consciousness billions of years after 'big bang...'
I decided to develop a theory for this to explain how we became conscious, and what will happen upon death. I also wanted to discribe this as a type of Morphic Field, but instead calling it the biofield of consciousness.
It is best to always start with the simple stuff, then work your way into it.
First, there will be many biofields, according to how many types of liforms there are, how many inhabit the universe, and all life forms that will potentially be coming into reality.
I cannot see there being only one single force for all life. These fields must have a character with memory of space and time capable of creating a single type of life form. Thus i see it more probable that there is one biofield per life form race. One for the dog, one for the human and one for the little green men.
It is a potential field... consisting of virtual particles, like a type of sea. This will be seen in strong light from Dr. Ludvik Bass' idea of one single mind. Before nature has arranged the particles for the correct conditions for life or a particular race of life, the field can permeate all spacetime until it can activate the correct matter, because it would act analogous to the Dirac Sea, which is really the same as the Zero-Point Energy Field.
I believe that this sea of virtual particles transport consciousness through angular momentum... Just like two particles sharing energy through angular momentum. It will use seemingly dead matter to arrange living matter. Consciousness could not be fully defined before it became self-aware.
I believe that we become self-aware through the simple law of self-reflection. For a thing to self-reflect, it must be able to reflect on its own existence somehow. The ability to self-reflect on ones own existence causes us to be physically aware. But in the virtual state, we were not conscious. We were potential energy. This way there is a special correlation between the virtuals particles and the real particles that make us up.
Real matter seems to be a conduit in this theory. Arranged correctly and they would yeild the perfect vessels for life and consciousness. In fact, the field of consciousness may very well be electromagnetic in character. We can imagine this field to have a memory, and it would be seen as effecting matter. I find it interesting that the Zero-Point Energy Field is seen as causing the inertial effect on matter. The field would be seen acting like this, having an effect on matter as it moved through spacetime.
The energy (biofields) would have streamed in from big bang on a set pre-planned course throughout spacetime. The fields would have arose from the vacuum, out of the zero-point energy just as matter did, and flooded spacetime with information.
This is where my theory gets really strange. There are an infinite amount of potantial conscious energy, as opposed to the classical idea that there are a finite number of souls.
I don't beleive there necesserally needs to be a finite amount of souls which quantum leap into new bodies upon death. They could just simply merge back into the potential ether of the biofield for the rest of the universes history, which could be forever. This would mean that each individual truely are unique and individual. I considered that this might violate the principle of least action, but the need of it was more important. Without it, sould are recylced, and i am not so sure of that idea, despite of the claims of people who say they have lived previous lives, but i wouldn't be ready to simply jump into that theory without great cause. I would like to think though that the universe abides by the principle of least action in the case of creating single unique and individual souls than to simple recyling the energy, because then how does one measure how many sould there are and why is there a quota?
We can't even say, ''Well, estimating the time of the universe until we die and measure this time against the rate of human production, because we could potentially use souls for an eternity (if we get smart enough to avoid black holes), and learn how to live in an empty universe. If we have an infinite amount of souls, we might even say that the concept of determinism evaporates. In a finite field, there is an accountable amount of consciousness, making a measurable collective pool.
We can also see thoughts, feelings, emotions and dreams as all being product of some design made for it during big bang. Now, what caused big bang really isn't up for discussion here.
It seem irrelevent. Whilst it may have been caused by a passing brane, or that it simply came from nowhere, it is irrelevent. But it turns out that thoughts are in fact apart of the information contained within the biofield. We are already taught that spacetime has a memory, so this might be how spacetime acts as a mediator for this field. Again, it might be oscillating through the hidden dimensions of space. If it is a baby universe curled up into the 6th dimension of spacetime, we must assume that if it is coming from this universe, the information contained within the field cannot have a special configuration, but instead moving into this universe totally mangled of order.
Thus i tend not to think anything of order can mediate between this universe and Hawking's
Baby Universe Theory. And if Hawking is correct about black hole transportation, then stuff cannot even move between universes anymore. Funny enough though, this also has potential for dismissing the existence of the white hole, as it is supposed to spew out matter that a black holes sucks in.
Dreams, though they have no intuitive order, they have a cosmic order. This will also mean that this information is all contained within the being of a particular creature, in this case, humans. The contending idea is that quantum information moves into the self upon observation. For some reason, i never liked this interpretation. It was vague at best. It would have been so much better to say that information exists within the potential of the soul, or collection of psychons, or even the statistics of biowaves. They could contain a whopping amount of information. They would need to if they had been on a preplanned course throughout history. More interesting is that there needed to be a field for it to have this information. If we collect information from anywhere, it is from this field. And since we are a product of the same field, we must assume it is dormant within the soul, and becomes real upon measurement.
If consciousness has an energy, this energy will be in a ground state; the increase of knowledge is an increase of entropy, and this is show we either (come to remember an outcome), or if you like, (the gaining of knowledge from the outside* - my theory is only a theory after all) - and this all requires the presence of an energy, since energy and time are closely related... In fact, without either, the other would cease to exist, and they work together to arrange a particular formation in life. Since consciousness requires a physical coil to become independent in thought, and since matter is somehow the same thing as its diffused cousin (energy), it's not so difficult to understand that consciousness too requires energy.
An atom will radiate, dissipate or transfer energy - but energy cannot at any time disappear: This is because of the conservation law of matter-energy - the first law of thermodynamics. The energy of consciousness shouldn't be any different to the energy of an atom; its electronic inhabitant, unless of course it defy's logic and quantum reasoning.
The electromagnetic field may well intimately interact with the field of consciousness, as electromagnetic forces carry information and self around the body. Tracking the field of consciousness might be difficult however, because we are not sure what it consists of. It might be however, made up of electromagnetic waves, as found in Biofields within matter.
If 'life' creates this field of consciousness, then we should expect a change in death: The energy of consciousness must 'move out' of the physical coil it once inhabited, and it can only do this by either radiating, dissipating or by transferal. The energy source, or soul of a human being at death, cannot spontaneously flow into the body of another. This has simularistic overtones to the second law of thermodynamics, which states that heat cannot spontaneously flow from one body into a warmer body.
Even though this might be just another fancy way of describing consciousness, we cannot fail to see that if it has an energy, it must follow similar rules to thermodynamics, if it is a physical energy. For a while, i was could not make up my mind whether the energy of consciousness was a factor of a physical field, or a by-product of a virtual field. In any case, i now believe it is both, due to the connections between matter-energy and time-awareness. I am simply applying quantum rules in places not normally considered it can be applied. Also, the second law of thermodynamics would be violated if souls spontaneously moved from one body to another. Another reason why i beleive there is an infinite amount of souls, or potenatial souls.
If conscious energy radiates from the body at the point of death, we might be able to measure this energy, using resonance scanners. If it dissipates, we might be able to measure a weight of difference within the dead corpse - (in fact, this idea has already been used extensively by a Dr. David Jones concerning the physical soul) - and if the energy transfer’s, we would need to ask exactly where it is being emitted from. Some might opt. for the spiritual answer, by involving a process of rebirth - (the co-called afterlife existence).
If the energy of consciousness is not a physical force, it would be very difficult, if not, impossible to suggest thoughts on its nature after death. There would be absolutely no way to tell whether it would abide to the conventional laws of thermodynamics; though, the idea would in itself be consistent with quantum mechanical interpretations, since everything must follow quantum rules. However, as we have seen is that not every cornerstone principle is necessarily ''kept'' by the presence of consciousness, such as David Z. Albert's discovery of 'secret knowledge', which states we can be aware of our own positions and paths simultaneously, defying the classical boundaries of the uncertainty principle - or also known as 'the principle of indeterminism.'
Perhaps one day we might be able to detect the presence of a physical force leaving the body at death > otherwise, then consciousness exist soley a non-physical force, and is bound by the matter in inhabits. Something quite sad and depressing arises from this chain of thought; after all, the idea we continue after death is comforting and reassuring... This is the also described as being a pseudoscienfic theory.
Reiku :m:
:shrug: