Mock me all you want. My net worth has been WAY into 8-figures since I was 30.
Not mocking you. In fact in last post came to your defense. You may have done very well, but it is not possible to determine how much is luck and how much is skill and knowledge. (Or even how much is due to fact you are already in the rich class GWB is distributing benefits to.)
Yours is silly, "sloppy thinking" to call annual nominal wage gains of less than 5% (3,8% last year) "good news" when food prices are up much more. Probably you spend very small fraction of your income on food, but unfortunately the poor spend a very much larger fraction. So yes, I can agree that
for the rich, GWB has been good (and they have been good to him with financial support) but for the average Joe American (and the US) GWB has been a disaster - worst president ever.
Here is some information on food prices from the Economist:
"In early September the world price of wheat rose to over $400 a tonne, the highest ever recorded. In May it had been around $200. Though in real terms its price is far below the heights it scaled in 1974, it is still twice the average of the past 25 years. Earlier this year the price of maize (corn) exceeded $175 a tonne, again a world record. It has fallen from its peak, as has that of wheat, but at $150 a tonne is still 50% above the average for 2006.
As the price of one crop shoots up, farmers plant it to take advantage, switching land from other uses. So a rise in wheat prices has knock-on effects on other crops. Rice prices have hit records this year, although their rise has been slower.
The Economist's food-price index is now at its highest since it began in 1845, having RISEN BY ONE-THIRD IN THE LAST YEAR."
FROM;
http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10250420
SEE also the cover story for the current issue entitled;"Food prices - The end of cheap food" Dec 6th 2007
at:
http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10252015
I and sorry, but last year's 3.8% rise in wages does not compensate for last year's 33% increase in costs! "GOOD NEWS only for the rich - yes; but not for Joe American or the USA. The crash is coming as when Joe dies, so do you.
PS to Quad:
You are good at searching. I tried to find article My earlier post was based on, but failed. Please find some index of US only food and gasoline prices for approximately date GWB came to office and relatively recently the same data. Then with data for the same dates on the average US wage (also nominal or inflation corected) to see if I am correct or wrong in the strong belief that it has become much harder for "Joe American" to put food on the table and gas in his car under GWB. I do not know how you could get the data but I also bet that for people like Sandy who have been the primary class benefited by reduced capital gains taxes etc. and spend only a small fraction on food and gasoline, the reason they like GWB will be obvious. They became better off as Joe has lost ground. I know I have read that for the first time in a century, at least, the gap between rich and poor has widened under GWB.
BTW, at my second Economist ref above states:
"... That is why this year's price rise has been so extraordinary. Since the spring, wheat prices have doubled and almost every crop under the sun—maize, milk, oilseeds, you name it—is at or near a peak in nominal terms. The Economist's food-price index is higher today than at any time since it was created in 1845 (see chart). Even in real terms, prices have jumped by 75% since 2005. ..." NOT AS STRONG AS THE ONE I CAN NOT FIND BUT CERTAIN SUPPORTS MY SOMEWHAT VAGUE CLAIM WHICH YOU CALLED REDICULUS.