Thoreau
Valued Senior Member
Non-existant Morality
I never quite understood the concept of debating morality between individuals. It's like trying to debate religion and prove who's right.
Morality is the concept of socially agree'd upon judgements of what is deemed as that which is acceptable and that which is not. And we determine these judgements based on what we, as a collective society, view as productive and destructive acts and behaviors in regards to our interactions and reactions with the people within our communities. WIth no other people around, who is to judge which is which?
Morality does not and cannot exist within the scope of pure individualism. It is the influence of others throughout our life which stamp and patent our judgements of morality, not hereditary predispositioned opinions. If one is never told what is right and wrong, then there is no true right or wrong and never will be. There is only what is productive and destructive to that human being.
We as a larger society have agree'd that murder is wrong/immoral. But what is murder to the uninfluenced human being that requires the killing of those around him for the goal of self-preservation? To him it is "right" because it is productive.
Ok, now do your thing.... I'm curious as to what this may turn into.
I never quite understood the concept of debating morality between individuals. It's like trying to debate religion and prove who's right.
Morality is the concept of socially agree'd upon judgements of what is deemed as that which is acceptable and that which is not. And we determine these judgements based on what we, as a collective society, view as productive and destructive acts and behaviors in regards to our interactions and reactions with the people within our communities. WIth no other people around, who is to judge which is which?
Morality does not and cannot exist within the scope of pure individualism. It is the influence of others throughout our life which stamp and patent our judgements of morality, not hereditary predispositioned opinions. If one is never told what is right and wrong, then there is no true right or wrong and never will be. There is only what is productive and destructive to that human being.
We as a larger society have agree'd that murder is wrong/immoral. But what is murder to the uninfluenced human being that requires the killing of those around him for the goal of self-preservation? To him it is "right" because it is productive.
Ok, now do your thing.... I'm curious as to what this may turn into.
Last edited: