Did you ever think that maybe America (as a sociaty) is incapable of empathy?
We do have a frontier-era attitude that everyone has to make it on his own. Nonetheless that's only one component of our national character. Americans are one of the most generous people on earth. We fall all over each other trying to help the people of the Third World. We just can't understand why they don't do what we did and rise up and overthrow their tyrannical governments.
Its like a massive sociopath unable to understand its own citizans and understand anyone else. Look at all the school shootings, the responce to terriousm, the fact that you are the only industrlised country with no universal health care. . . .
Because of our history of being suspicious of tyrannical governments, many of us are reluctant to increase the power of government beyond the too-big-for-its-britches level that it has already achieved. We simply do not want to live in a "nanny state" where Big Brother takes care of everything, because that invariably leads to reduced freedom. We're willing to take the risks that come with freedom. People who are not should not live here.
, as far as i know you also have the lowest min wage, the least protection for workers and limited social secruities as well. Not to mention APALING education
Azzy, I avoid commenting on your "appalling" spelling, but please dude, you're forcing me to point out that you're the last person in Australia who should be setting yourself up as the poster child for its educational system! Please climb down off of your high horse. Or get a Mac, OS/X spell-checks everything whether you want it or not.
It red-lined about twenty words in the short portion of your post I quoted.
Do you know how freaking retarded that is? We're in the ME because we're fighting the war on terror. If the muslims would behave and stop committing terror attacks, we would not be there fighting them. THEY started this. WE will finish it. People are not born terrorists. They are trained by the scum of the earth to destroy/kill innocent people. We didn't steal anything from anyone. We're trying to bring democracy but the vile terrorists want no part of it.
That's more than a little simplistic, Sandy. You claim to have a university education. Surely you're aware of the fact that the USA and the USSR used the Middle East as their own private chessboard throughout the Cold War. WE kept the Shah in power so that Iran would not get cozier with the Soviets. WE created the Taliban because they fought against the Afghan factions that were allied with the Russians and would have turned Afghanistan into a Soviet satellite country. WE supported Saddam Hussein because he was fighting a war against Iran. Of course the Russians were doing the same thing from their side. The people of the Middle East have good reason to think that the Americans and Russians treated them like crap and made their countries the way they are today, and good reason to dislike us intensely.
Punishing the Iraqis for something the Saudis did (9/11) just makes us look not only evil, but stupid. Many hard-line Muslims consider Saudi Arabia to be a pawn of the US, and the fact that we bombed Kabul and Baghdad instead of Riyadh only reinforces that conviction. Bin Laden is a member by marriage of the Saudi royal family. If we had told King Abdullah that he had 24 hours to deliver Osama's head to us or we would start bombing the crap out of his country, overthrowing its despotic ruler, and occupying it so we could liberate its women, you can bet that a FedEx truck with Osama's gift-wrapped head would have shown up at the White House with about eighteen hours to spare. Instead, our treasonous president made a special exception to the no-fly rule on 9/11 and permitted a planeload of Saudis to leave the country. For all we know, Osama could have been on that plane. Oh yeah, and Saudi pilots won't fly unless we remove all female personnel from our control towers!
Totally agree. The U.S. should have known better when they carved up the old Ottoman Empire, just like they should have known better when they created Pakistan. Good post.!
Sandy may not realize that you're making a joke. It was the Brits who carved up the Ottoman Empire when it collapsed just about the same time WWI ended. It was the Brits who then decided to hand Palestine (part of the Ottoman Empire) over to the Jewish refugees at the end of WWII, since as far as they were concerned nobody important was living there. It was virtually everybody else in Europe who thought that was a splendid idea, because as ashamed as they were for having made antisemitism their national sport for a thousand years, and as much as they wanted to do something nice for the Jews, they didn't want to go so far as to invite them back to their home cities in Europe, which is in fact where 99.99% of them would rather have gone. (Zionism was a radical fringe movement with little popular support.) It was also the Brits who created "nations" like Iraq and Nigeria during their colonial era, by cobbling together fragments of ethnic groups who had nothing in common but mutual hatred, drawing some pretty lines on a map, and saying, "Here, this is your home so start getting along."
As for how Pakistan came to be, we should probably wait for Sam to explain it. I'm not entirely sure we can blame the West for that particular disaster, although we have a lot to do with the fact that a despot like Musharraf is in charge of it.