Mindreader genius parrot

It seems the more we find out about animals the more we discover just how much we have vastly underestimated their intellect. :eek:
 
Interesting.

The test of the parrot's telepathic abilities was conducted by Rupert Sheldrake. Apparently he's regarded as a bit of a woo-woo. Sheldrake found that the parrot correctly 'read' it's owner's thoughts 32 out of 123 times (a '1 in a billion' chance, he says). This equates to a succes rate of 26.01%.

National Geographic featured his work in a programme called Is It Real? Psychic Animals. They filmed another test conducted by the sceptic Tony Youens, starring a parrot called Spalding. Using Sheldrake's methodology the programme-makers found that this second parrot was also telepathic, with a success rate of 27%.

They then revealed some flaws in Sheldrake's methodology:

i) Dr Sheldrake’s results were skewed because in his test he only counted trials when the parrot actually responded to the stimuli (as opposed to making no noise);

ii) Dr Sheldrake’s results were further skewed because in his test he discounted those trials which required the parrot to say a rarely used word.
Sheldrake complained and had his complaint partly upheld by the TV watchdogs (the programme failed to provide him with an opportunity to respond, and provided no balance to the critique from a neutral 3rd party). However, Sheldrake's complaint of having his research misrepresented was rejected.

http://www.usatoday.com/life/2001-02-12-parrot.htm

http://www.sheldrake.org/D&C/controversies/Ofcom_full.html

So some cause for doubt. I'd definitely like to see that parrot given a fair trial though.
 
Incidentally,

Why do parrots imitate sounds?
http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mparrot.html

I have a parrot that talks. Like many parrots, it will spend hours working on some new phrase. Why do they do this? Why the investment in the time, sitting there, and why the investment in brain development required to support this sort of thing? --Brian Marshall

SDSTAFF Doug replies:

Probably for the same reason that applies to most things in biology: SEX! [No, apparently not - read on..]

Mynahs, mockingbirds, and various other birds will mimic sounds in their environment to boost their song repertoire. The more complex a male's repertoire, the more impressive he will seem to females (though this doesn't seem to apply to humans, if Michael Bolton is any indication). The idea is that only a superior male, with all his senses in fine form, could learn, remember, and reproduce a wide variety of sounds--so a versatile male should have a higher probability of having "good genes." In practice, it probably just helps weed out the truly inferior males. I suspect your parrot falls into the same class of critters, though it could certainly be disproved easily-- like if female parrots were just as good at mimicry as males. Then we'd need another hypothesis, like improved pair bonding when members of a mated pair imitate one another. Whatever the truth is, the roots of parrot behavior should relate to their behavior in nature, not the artificial environment we put them in.

Hoping to narrow the possibilities a bit, I called a local pet store owner, who informed me there was no noticeable difference between the vocabularies of male and female parrots. That suggests that mimicry in parrots is more of a "social bonding" thing (they do form very tight monogamous relationships, as well as often associating in large groups) than just an "impress the female" thing, as with songbirds.

Still, the claim that the investment of time and energy pays off in reproductive success is still valid, even if it is only a matter of pair-bonding. The term "survival of the fittest" has two components--survival, which is obvious, and "fitness," which is how many offspring you leave behind relative to everyone else. Most everything an animal does relates to one of these. A parrot that mimics sounds may not improve its survival any, but if it leads to more effective communication with its mate, or increased fidelity, then it might affect how many offspring it has and how long they survive.
Any other thoughts on this?
 
Interesting.

The test of the parrot's telepathic abilities was conducted by Rupert Sheldrake. Apparently he's regarded as a bit of a woo-woo. Sheldrake found that the parrot correctly 'read' it's owner's thoughts 32 out of 123 times (a '1 in a billion' chance, he says). This equates to a succes rate of 26.01%.

I don't quite get how getting an answer 32 out of 123 times right (well, right in a very lose sense I gather from reading one of the articles) equals to 1 in a billion chance.
 
I don't quite get how getting an answer 32 out of 123 times right (well, right in a very lose sense I gather from reading one of the articles) equals to 1 in a billion chance.

I believe he means by pure guessing methods. The pictures were supposed to have never been seen my the parrot before. So, getting 32/123 correct is quite amazing.
 
Morgana is examining a photo of a woman embracing a man when N'Kisi, who was upstairs in her cage and could not see the photograph Morgana was holding in her hand, calls out: "Can I give you a hug?"

However, clearly a woman embracing a man is not the same as a parrot expressing the desire to hug an experimentator.

So what's right?

And still how can you calculate the odds? Showing a card of the US nuking nagasaki would probably not be guessed right by the parrot in any case, unless he was an expert on japanese history.
 
Back
Top