Lately I have been reading and reading and reading, I have watched every documentary on aliens, crop circles, abductions, pyramids and the Face of Mars, that I could find. I have google news alert me anytime the words UFO, crop circle; Nasa etc are in the mainstream news.
I have thousands of ufo photos, movies, news clippings. I have read related material like the Brookings report etc. I have dived into sites concerning UFO's in the bible. I have heard lectures by Klass, Friedman, hoagland etc..
Do I believe in any of this stuff? Answer = some
Anyone trying to research these topics must admit, that in order to have any success you must become very proficient in swimming through mounds of crap. I suggest the breaststroke.
After all this, what intrigues me most is our moon. It is so close .Yes we have all heard claims of structures on the moon. And I actually believe they are there. Not because of pictures shown by Richard Hoagland or other sites.
http://www.mufor.org/moon2.htm
http://www.keithlaney.com then 3 moon structures
But due to the lack of info on the moon. NASA has been photographing and studying the moon prior to 1969. But considering the amount of time we have spent studying the moon there is almost a black hole of data. We know its there but we can't see it. It's been 35 years since Neal Armstrong supposedly walked on the moon. And yet we have so very few decent high-resolution photos, and amazingly no photos of stars from the moons perspective. Im sure in picking landing sites NASA relied on much higher resolution pictures than the public has ever seen.
In 1995 Nasa clearly stated claims the Hubble was incapable of photographing the moon. Claiming its brightness would destroy the lens and held onto this position.
Richard Hoagland called this a flat lie stating that Nasa aimed the Hubble at earth’s clouds to recalibrate every fours hours. And earth’s clouds are 4 times brighter than the moon.
Then after 5 years of BS. Nasa in 1999 released a photo of a crater captured by the Hubble at the moons high noon "when it's at it's brightest"
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/photo_gallery/photogallery-moon.html
But it seems other than this quick snapshot in 1999 Nasa has, not had time to take any more photos of moon. Why?
Is somebody lying? Again? And again?
If Russia and the USA can keep a secret, will Europe, China and Japan follow the same path of deception? As all are sending probes to the moon. Don’t know, but think not. Also our moon is a strange anomaly in itself, abnormal in it keeps a rotation perfectly to keep one side always facing us. That is a strange thing don’t be mistaken. The reasons for this are only hypothesized. Claiming the side of the moon facing us is in a gravity lock with earth. No other moons in the solar syste... NASA stand for Never Admit Seeing Anything ?
I have thousands of ufo photos, movies, news clippings. I have read related material like the Brookings report etc. I have dived into sites concerning UFO's in the bible. I have heard lectures by Klass, Friedman, hoagland etc..
Do I believe in any of this stuff? Answer = some
Anyone trying to research these topics must admit, that in order to have any success you must become very proficient in swimming through mounds of crap. I suggest the breaststroke.
After all this, what intrigues me most is our moon. It is so close .Yes we have all heard claims of structures on the moon. And I actually believe they are there. Not because of pictures shown by Richard Hoagland or other sites.
http://www.mufor.org/moon2.htm
http://www.keithlaney.com then 3 moon structures
But due to the lack of info on the moon. NASA has been photographing and studying the moon prior to 1969. But considering the amount of time we have spent studying the moon there is almost a black hole of data. We know its there but we can't see it. It's been 35 years since Neal Armstrong supposedly walked on the moon. And yet we have so very few decent high-resolution photos, and amazingly no photos of stars from the moons perspective. Im sure in picking landing sites NASA relied on much higher resolution pictures than the public has ever seen.
In 1995 Nasa clearly stated claims the Hubble was incapable of photographing the moon. Claiming its brightness would destroy the lens and held onto this position.
Richard Hoagland called this a flat lie stating that Nasa aimed the Hubble at earth’s clouds to recalibrate every fours hours. And earth’s clouds are 4 times brighter than the moon.
Then after 5 years of BS. Nasa in 1999 released a photo of a crater captured by the Hubble at the moons high noon "when it's at it's brightest"
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/photo_gallery/photogallery-moon.html
But it seems other than this quick snapshot in 1999 Nasa has, not had time to take any more photos of moon. Why?
Is somebody lying? Again? And again?
If Russia and the USA can keep a secret, will Europe, China and Japan follow the same path of deception? As all are sending probes to the moon. Don’t know, but think not. Also our moon is a strange anomaly in itself, abnormal in it keeps a rotation perfectly to keep one side always facing us. That is a strange thing don’t be mistaken. The reasons for this are only hypothesized. Claiming the side of the moon facing us is in a gravity lock with earth. No other moons in the solar syste... NASA stand for Never Admit Seeing Anything ?
Last edited: