Maybe some comprehend
- Thread starter Bishadi
- Start date
Pathetic. I already gave the numbers in that other thread where you were trolling - and you weren't even bright enough to realize it !!:bugeye:
this can be observed
pretty much.....
but the 'force' .... the physical aspect of what 'it' is: can these vary in potential by the electromagnetic release?
the idea being asked is can the 'heat' of each chemical reaction be defined in wavelengths (nm), rather than as joules/eV...?
such that we 'can' take the 'temp' and convert the scale but are the actual wavelengths measured in chemical reactions such as the H and O combination?
Heat is energy transferred from a hot body to a colder one.
The heat manifests itself as kinetic energy of the resulting water molecules.
No. Heat is energy. Wavelength is length.
Hope this helps!
A kinetic energy that flows towards entropy. Wasn't this question already asked by you and answered before?
Hi Bishadi. Unfortunately, I'm no physicist but I think heat is something we all take for granted. There is perhaps more to learn about how heat is generated.
We do know heat is EMR, and that heat is also friction.
On Foucault's wheel, heat is generated by magnetic friction. The motion of the conductor generates heat as it passes through the electromagnet. The eddy currents on the conductor create an opposing magnetic field. The kinetic energy of the wheel in motion generates heat. This heat is the result of a drag force. It is the friction between two magnetic fields.
A falling object will also generate heat. The terminal velocity of an object is the result of its opposing drag force. The increase in drag force increases the amount of heat generated. Kinetic energy is turned into heat.
If we know that heat is EMR, then perhaps, there is something we don't quite fully understand about kinetic energy. This could degenerate into a heavy philosophical discussion on Zeno's paradoxes, but it could be argued that kinetic energy is not a property of the object itself. In fact, it could be said that the kinetic energy is actually a property of the fluid which surrounds the object. I am of course referring to the aether.
I guess I'll have to sit down, and have a good think about how the above relates (if at all!!) with the chemical reaction of H and O.
and in a big scope a solar flare could be the sun transfering energy
and to bottle up that 'heat' now we have something to work on
So let's bottle it up and work on the definition
it is a value, it has properties and it does affect mass
and infrared is what.............?
what is friction, to molecule A and molecule B when they frict?
What is that thing (heat) coming from the rubbing?
basically a motion is 'generating' an x......(heat)...... what is that x?
can't say it is joules, nor temp, nor eV or calories.... they are scales but not the 'it'
we in pseudo, so rather than just open up wiki and copy an old definition, let's play with this a bit
my logic is on the idea that if mass is cold, at abolsute zero, for it to be 'warm' what is added to the mass to 'heat' it up?
i agree
first half is agreed, but friction tells us nothing as to what HEAT is.
i like your style here, as then the mass is not so much causing the 'heat' as much as the fields interacting
Almost like 2 planet could hit each others and a huge amount of the stuff described as 'heat' comes from the impact....
ahh.... so that transformation is what needs defining....
you are spelling it out quite nicely
as much as it may seem philosophical we talking about an 'x' defined as heat which is naturally in existence that is not perfectly defined
this is a scientific requisite, not a philosophical debate
no H and O can combine without a catalyst or infux of energy to enable the reaction.
as well, when that 'spark' begins the reaction, the H2 and O2 combining, releases, light, kinetic energy and 'heat' upon the environment
what is 'it' and where did 'it' come from?
What a bunch of silly, foolish people (especially the OP) - trying to discuss something when they don't even have a clue as to what they are talking about!:bugeye:
IR radiation - or any other waveband for that matter - is NOT heat! And neither is friction - that's plain stupid. EM radiation is just another form of energy and certainly isn't heat. Friction is nothing more than the physical resistance interaction between two materials in which one is moving - or attempting to move - across (or whatever) another. It most certainly can produce heat but is NOT heat in itself.
Simply and succinctly put, heat is the vibratory motion of molecules - and yes, even individual atoms and the moving components of plasma.
You people don't need to go back to college or even high school - you need to return to the lowest elementary school level - and PAY ATTENTION this time!!!!
Such displays of gross ignorance should be punished by a rap across the knuckles with a fast-swung ten-pound hammer.:bugeye:
IR radiation - or any other waveband for that matter - is NOT heat! And neither is friction - that's plain stupid. EM radiation is just another form of energy and certainly isn't heat. Friction is nothing more than the physical resistance interaction between two materials in which one is moving - or attempting to move - across (or whatever) another. It most certainly can produce heat but is NOT heat in itself.
Simply and succinctly put, heat is the vibratory motion of molecules - and yes, even individual atoms and the moving components of plasma.
You people don't need to go back to college or even high school - you need to return to the lowest elementary school level - and PAY ATTENTION this time!!!!
Such displays of gross ignorance should be punished by a rap across the knuckles with a fast-swung ten-pound hammer.:bugeye:
r u the almighty salami of the world?
infrared is what?
the sun is just throwing magic stuff at us.
most sense you ever wrote, that i can remember
at what 'wavelength' are they vibrating at? (resonance)
is this something we should write down, oh mighty salami?
are you getting mad to find out how little you really know?
you remind of who socrates was talking about
"virtue was the most valuable of all possessions; the ideal life was spent in search of the Good. Truth lies beneath the shadows of existence, and that it is the job of the philosopher to show the rest how little they really know."
it seems you a part of 'the rest'