Masturbation is for Losers
- Thread starter Lori_7
- Start date
- Status
Medicine Woman said:
Why would you do that to yourself?
Since you seem to be all knowing.....
Where is this woman's right arm? Why is her head tilted to the right? Yes of course her arm is behind her. Why?
What I want you and all these other all knowing people to do is to answer a simple question any 6 year old would ask. Why? If you say "just because", that is a 6 year old answer.
If you say "because the photographer posed her that way", that is a reasonable answer. The next question is "Why? Why did he pose her that way?"
You guys are absolutely certain I am wrong, yet you have no alternative. I have said that at least 5 times. Every day, another adult comes here and repeats the exact same thing. I really do not know what is wrong with people.
You look them square in the face and say "provide a better answer" and they can't. Yet they continue to insist that I am wrong.
Seriously. If you take that picture above, use your eyes, and 25% of the power of your brain, you could figure out half of Happeh Theory. Especially since I already told you loads of hints. I think I even told you the answer directly. But people refuse to see it for some reason or the other.
Last edited:
I only read the post above so ill try an answer.
The photo is tricked. what you see is her back. if you look the our under arms, you can see the connection below the shoulder is very similar to the connection you see from the back of a person. The arm is on her back, yet her back is presented to us.
If you carefully look at her shoulder, you see no spherical muscle on it. -> suggesting that it is indeed her back.
If im wrong then i give up.
(or was this just a metaphor for a more pertinent thread discussion)
The photo is tricked. what you see is her back. if you look the our under arms, you can see the connection below the shoulder is very similar to the connection you see from the back of a person. The arm is on her back, yet her back is presented to us.
If you carefully look at her shoulder, you see no spherical muscle on it. -> suggesting that it is indeed her back.
If im wrong then i give up.
(or was this just a metaphor for a more pertinent thread discussion)
James R said:
I can guess she did masturbate too much. You do know that Madonna got started as a lip synching lap dancer don't you? Or were you still in grade school then? So we can say that she is engaged in excessive sex.
She is unbalanced. She is sitting like that because her right side is atrophied. The shoulder is shorter than it should be. Like all those guys whose right side dropped. The head hangs down because the right side cannot support it.
Your head is like a handful of pipe cleaners. If you grab hold of a handful of pipe cleaners and hold them, what do you have? A vaguely circular collection of pipe cleaners. Now remove any pipe cleaner at random. Maybe two or three of them. What do you have now? You have a circle with a hole in it. That exact same thing happened to her head. She lost some pipe cleaners on the right side of her head. There is a hole there now. The muscles to hold up the right side of the head are gone so it hangs down.
Because her head and right side naturally hang down, the photographer posed her in such a way as to counterbalance her natural tendencies. Since she wants to go down on the right, he had her raise her right shoulder up and lean down on the left. When she does this,the arm has to drop back behind her because of the damage to the shoulder.
I believe I may have found a new lead.
What about a photo of the "happeh fibres"? Rather than just a diagram?
In order for happeh theory to exist, than the fibres ("spaghetti like") must exist too right? And should be able to be photographed and provided?
What about a photo of the "happeh fibres"? Rather than just a diagram?
In order for happeh theory to exist, than the fibres ("spaghetti like") must exist too right? And should be able to be photographed and provided?
good call
why should we feed the troll?
why should we be the ones to punish the troll?
why should the troll consume our time?
we should discuss science fiction, and bold new ideas whilst maintaining moral integrity and preserving positive values.
etc. etc.
we should be architects of the future
not critics of happeh theory. lol
"i remember once there was this guy called happeh and he had a 60 page thread on masturbation" lol
why? because of happeh's issues.
man i feel sorry for you happeh. I don't know why masturbation bothers you so much. Insects bother me, i want to exterminate the entire species of insects.
why should we feed the troll?
why should we be the ones to punish the troll?
why should the troll consume our time?
we should discuss science fiction, and bold new ideas whilst maintaining moral integrity and preserving positive values.
etc. etc.
we should be architects of the future
not critics of happeh theory. lol
"i remember once there was this guy called happeh and he had a 60 page thread on masturbation" lol
why? because of happeh's issues.
man i feel sorry for you happeh. I don't know why masturbation bothers you so much. Insects bother me, i want to exterminate the entire species of insects.
Ophiolite
Valued Senior Member
Your plan has possibilities. At the very least it would be a means of testing the Happeh Hypothesis without risking the health of humans. We would probably have to provide them with pornography: the Mandible of the Month [You could be the Insect World's Huwy Heffner.] Or, since they are sensitive to chemicals, the Pheromone Pet. Or red leather thighboots on a millipede. Shit, this stuff is addictive. Happeh may be right, I feel myself leaning over already.
It's really quite bizarre...
60 pages have now passed and yet Happeh has not provided so much as one instance of a blind person with missing limbs even though his original claim was that masturbation makes you go blind and lose your limbs.
I would say this entire issue is all wrapped up.
60 pages have now passed and yet Happeh has not provided so much as one instance of a blind person with missing limbs even though his original claim was that masturbation makes you go blind and lose your limbs.
I would say this entire issue is all wrapped up.
That was a short attention span Ophiolite. You asked only 2 questions before you descended into silliness.
Here is a news story for the doubters to think about. You all love your authorities. Here is a news authority to give you it's blessing to believe this stuff
A woman was blind for 25 years. She had a heart attack and now she can see. The doctors have no idea what happened.
"My mother has never been given any medical explanation as to why she lost her sight, nor has she ever been offered any medical explanation as to how she recovered it."
Martin Breen, consultant cardiologist at the Walgrave Hospital, said: "I am not able to give a medical explanation. When she was admitted to hospital, she had suffered a serious heart attack and our main concern was to save her life. I am delighted that she has fully recovered, and it is an added bonus that she has also recovered her sight."
Now. It says right there as plain as day the doctors have no idea what happened. What do I have to do? Beat people over the head? The doctors have no idea what is going on. Doctors are not all knowing people that can explain everything.
Happeh Theory plainly says excessive masturbation etc will cause blindness, or maybe contribute to heart attack. Both symptoms that this lady had. (I am NOT saying this lady's conditions were from masturbation. I am saying the story provides an undeniable link between the heart and the eyes. Whatever the cause may be).
All these doctors need to do now is connect the eyes and the heart to the penis and they will be discussing Happeh Theory in everything but name.
I will prove I am right. Those doctors will catch up with me, or read my hints and get the answer themselves. It is only a matter of years before they start saying what I am saying now.
"A woman who had been blind for 25 years awoke in hospital after suffering a heart attack and found that she could see again.
Since 1979, Joyce Urch had lived in a world of shadows and near-darkness, but was astonished to find her sight restored when she came round after being resuscitated."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...ind20.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/01/20/ixhome.html
Here is a news story for the doubters to think about. You all love your authorities. Here is a news authority to give you it's blessing to believe this stuff
A woman was blind for 25 years. She had a heart attack and now she can see. The doctors have no idea what happened.
"My mother has never been given any medical explanation as to why she lost her sight, nor has she ever been offered any medical explanation as to how she recovered it."
Martin Breen, consultant cardiologist at the Walgrave Hospital, said: "I am not able to give a medical explanation. When she was admitted to hospital, she had suffered a serious heart attack and our main concern was to save her life. I am delighted that she has fully recovered, and it is an added bonus that she has also recovered her sight."
Now. It says right there as plain as day the doctors have no idea what happened. What do I have to do? Beat people over the head? The doctors have no idea what is going on. Doctors are not all knowing people that can explain everything.
Happeh Theory plainly says excessive masturbation etc will cause blindness, or maybe contribute to heart attack. Both symptoms that this lady had. (I am NOT saying this lady's conditions were from masturbation. I am saying the story provides an undeniable link between the heart and the eyes. Whatever the cause may be).
All these doctors need to do now is connect the eyes and the heart to the penis and they will be discussing Happeh Theory in everything but name.
I will prove I am right. Those doctors will catch up with me, or read my hints and get the answer themselves. It is only a matter of years before they start saying what I am saying now.
"A woman who had been blind for 25 years awoke in hospital after suffering a heart attack and found that she could see again.
Since 1979, Joyce Urch had lived in a world of shadows and near-darkness, but was astonished to find her sight restored when she came round after being resuscitated."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...ind20.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/01/20/ixhome.html
Can't let it go can you? You know that means I must post more pictures.
Last time, we were looking at women. Here is a picture of the 3 women so far.
The first two women have heads turned to the right, uneven hips, and a large depression in the right side. The third women has her head straight. Her leg is out at an odd angle and she has a large and small eye. She was included to show that it is not posture only that lets me know if someone has Happeh Symptoms. It is everything all together. Here is the new woman picture.
The new woman, just like the first two women, has uneven hips. She also has a large depression in the right side of her torso. This woman's head is straight like the 3rd women in the other picture. Look at her left eye. Oh wait. You can't, can you? Her hair is in the way. That is because the left eye and head have atrophied. The hair hangs farther forward over the smaller side of the head. It does not bother her that the left eye is covered with hair, because she cannot see too good out of it anyways.
Note how the left arm, on the same side I just said the head was atrophied, is lifted up close to the side of the body. That is not happenstance. The arm is connected to the head directly. It is not connected just to the shoulder like most people think.
There James. How is that for guessing?
Last time, we were looking at women. Here is a picture of the 3 women so far.
The first two women have heads turned to the right, uneven hips, and a large depression in the right side. The third women has her head straight. Her leg is out at an odd angle and she has a large and small eye. She was included to show that it is not posture only that lets me know if someone has Happeh Symptoms. It is everything all together. Here is the new woman picture.
The new woman, just like the first two women, has uneven hips. She also has a large depression in the right side of her torso. This woman's head is straight like the 3rd women in the other picture. Look at her left eye. Oh wait. You can't, can you? Her hair is in the way. That is because the left eye and head have atrophied. The hair hangs farther forward over the smaller side of the head. It does not bother her that the left eye is covered with hair, because she cannot see too good out of it anyways.
Note how the left arm, on the same side I just said the head was atrophied, is lifted up close to the side of the body. That is not happenstance. The arm is connected to the head directly. It is not connected just to the shoulder like most people think.
There James. How is that for guessing?
James R said:
U didn't answer the question. Were you in grade school when Madonna was starting out?
I think this goes right to the heart of things. If I am older than you, I have more experience than you. It is only common sense that I would know more about the world than you do.
- Status