Masturbation is for Losers
- Thread starter Lori_7
- Start date
- Status
James R said:
People said they did not believe me. I am posting proof until people believe me. You are saying my responding to peoples request for information is "a personal blog"?
I think you want to use your admin powers to get revenge for the child rapist thread. Every authority that ever tangled with me takes the same position. They attack me like you did in the child rapist thread. Then when I turn the table on them, and expose them for who they really are, just some name callers and haters at a bulletin board, attacking someone for having a different opinion, they always seem to indulge those tyrannical feelings and do things like you are doing here.
For a psychologist, you don't seem very good. You can't even diagnose your own motivations. Or you are not honest enough to admit to them.
Here is a post by cole grey asking me for information
I'm giving you one more chance to post reasonably, using proper english meanings for your words,
A post by you asking a question
What would you regard as "misshapen", I wonder...
A post by Facial telling me to keep at it
Happeh, I am proud to announce that you have exceeded URI's entertainment level. Keep up the good work.
I think what you need to do James, is admit that since the infantile silent treatment all you trained professional adults are giving me is not working, you want to try something else.
Remember that infant Cris publicly telling this forum of adults to give me the silent treatment?
You psycho guys are all the same. You mentally manipulate people who do not have your training. When you meet someone who can resist your mental manipulation, then you guys are revealed to be no better than the rest of us. Just like everyone else, you want to slam the door in the face of someone you cannot control.
Come out in the real world James. Come on down to my town. Come stand with me in a group of men. You cannot control them with words James. They don't listen to women. You will have to accept the fact that you cannot control everything.
I think that acceptance will help you mature. Help you move from this delusional place you live in where people are nice and courteous. It will bring you into reality where a man with a smart mouth like yours, telling people they need crazy counciling, will probably get you beaten up and left bleeding in the street.
Really James. Your world is delusional. Take away the money and the police and you will find out right quik what I mean when I say you are nothing close to a man.
I'm giving you one more chance to post reasonably, using proper english meanings for your words,
A post by you asking a question
What would you regard as "misshapen", I wonder...
A post by Facial telling me to keep at it
Happeh, I am proud to announce that you have exceeded URI's entertainment level. Keep up the good work.
I think what you need to do James, is admit that since the infantile silent treatment all you trained professional adults are giving me is not working, you want to try something else.
Remember that infant Cris publicly telling this forum of adults to give me the silent treatment?
You psycho guys are all the same. You mentally manipulate people who do not have your training. When you meet someone who can resist your mental manipulation, then you guys are revealed to be no better than the rest of us. Just like everyone else, you want to slam the door in the face of someone you cannot control.
Come out in the real world James. Come on down to my town. Come stand with me in a group of men. You cannot control them with words James. They don't listen to women. You will have to accept the fact that you cannot control everything.
I think that acceptance will help you mature. Help you move from this delusional place you live in where people are nice and courteous. It will bring you into reality where a man with a smart mouth like yours, telling people they need crazy counciling, will probably get you beaten up and left bleeding in the street.
Really James. Your world is delusional. Take away the money and the police and you will find out right quik what I mean when I say you are nothing close to a man.
Last edited:
Happeh:
It should be clear to you by now that people here are unconvinced by your photos with the tilted heads and curved bodies. Further photos of the same type won't help.
If you have any other evidence for your theory, perhaps you ought to present that.
You've made your point with the photos. Clearly, it would be easy to go on collecting more of the same and posting them here. Everybody tilts their head from time to time, after all. But it would simply clutter up the forum, to no useful end.
Since I'm sure you've already collected all this material elsewhere, why don't you just provide a link to your other web site(s)? Those who are interested can take a look.
Revenge for what?
I pity you that you can't relate to women, Happeh. But I don't feel vengeful about it.
I don't think that saying children enjoy being raped is a particularly good way to win friends and influence people, Happeh. What did you expect?
If (a) I was a professional psychologist, and (b) I valued your opinion on the matter, then I might be hurt by your comment. However, in this instance, neither (a) nor (b) applies.
Suppose you tell me what you think my "motivations" are. No, on second thoughts, forget it. It's off-topic, and won't be of any use here.
It should be clear to you by now that people here are unconvinced by your photos with the tilted heads and curved bodies. Further photos of the same type won't help.
If you have any other evidence for your theory, perhaps you ought to present that.
You've made your point with the photos. Clearly, it would be easy to go on collecting more of the same and posting them here. Everybody tilts their head from time to time, after all. But it would simply clutter up the forum, to no useful end.
Since I'm sure you've already collected all this material elsewhere, why don't you just provide a link to your other web site(s)? Those who are interested can take a look.
Revenge for what?
I pity you that you can't relate to women, Happeh. But I don't feel vengeful about it.
I don't think that saying children enjoy being raped is a particularly good way to win friends and influence people, Happeh. What did you expect?
If (a) I was a professional psychologist, and (b) I valued your opinion on the matter, then I might be hurt by your comment. However, in this instance, neither (a) nor (b) applies.
Suppose you tell me what you think my "motivations" are. No, on second thoughts, forget it. It's off-topic, and won't be of any use here.
Last edited:
The problem for people here is that they want an authority to verify what I say. I make 20 posts telling people to examine the evidence themselves and make their own decision. They refuse.
Scientists are liars. You can't trust them. You can only trust your own two eyes. Here is a story about one of those guys you trust. This man published a paper in Lancet.
Gullible fools like you lapped it up because he was a "scientist" and Lancet is an "authority". That is the only thing it takes to get your approval. Not eveidence or proof. Just a plaque or nametag saying scientist, and some guys in authority putting their hand on the guys shoulder indicating they stand behind him.
What am I supposed to do with people that trust liars, but not their own eyes?
A RESEARCHER has admitted fabricating a study into oral cancer involving 900 people that was published in the prestigious British medical journal, The Lancet.
Jon Sudbo, a cancer expert at Norway's Radium Hospital, invented patients and case studies to prove that long-term use of anti-inflammatories reduced the incidence of oral cancer but increased the risk of death due to cardiovascular disease.
The incident follows a similar scandal last year when the journal Science published research by South Korea's stem cell researcher, Hwang Woo Suk, who claimed to have cloned human cells.
Dr Hwang later admitted he falsified most of the results.
The Lancet's editor Richard Horton said it was impossible to detect fraudulent research.
"The peer-review process is good at picking up poorly designed studies, but it is not designed to pick up fabricated research," Dr Horton told the BBC. "Just as in society you cannot always prevent crime, in science you cannot always prevent fabrication."
However, according to the Norwegian daily newspaper Dagbladet, 250 of the 908 people in the study shared the same birthday.
Scientists are liars. You can't trust them. You can only trust your own two eyes. Here is a story about one of those guys you trust. This man published a paper in Lancet.
Gullible fools like you lapped it up because he was a "scientist" and Lancet is an "authority". That is the only thing it takes to get your approval. Not eveidence or proof. Just a plaque or nametag saying scientist, and some guys in authority putting their hand on the guys shoulder indicating they stand behind him.
What am I supposed to do with people that trust liars, but not their own eyes?
A RESEARCHER has admitted fabricating a study into oral cancer involving 900 people that was published in the prestigious British medical journal, The Lancet.
Jon Sudbo, a cancer expert at Norway's Radium Hospital, invented patients and case studies to prove that long-term use of anti-inflammatories reduced the incidence of oral cancer but increased the risk of death due to cardiovascular disease.
The incident follows a similar scandal last year when the journal Science published research by South Korea's stem cell researcher, Hwang Woo Suk, who claimed to have cloned human cells.
Dr Hwang later admitted he falsified most of the results.
The Lancet's editor Richard Horton said it was impossible to detect fraudulent research.
"The peer-review process is good at picking up poorly designed studies, but it is not designed to pick up fabricated research," Dr Horton told the BBC. "Just as in society you cannot always prevent crime, in science you cannot always prevent fabrication."
However, according to the Norwegian daily newspaper Dagbladet, 250 of the 908 people in the study shared the same birthday.
I love it when internet crackpots demonstrate their complete lack of knowledge of the scientific process. It's funny (in a sad pathetic sort of way).<P>Happeh said:
James R said:
Let us discuss this. I am showing evidence that people demanded. You say they do not believe it so I should stop showing it. Why? What do I care what a bunch of numbskulls think? I am certain there are people who are watching every picture and word and thinking about what I say. Those are the people i am trying to convince. The thinking scientists.
Listen to me very closely. You, as a scientist, are claiming that the examination of photos over the past 1 or 2 weeks is enough for someone to make a determination whether I am right or wrong.
As a scientist, not someone with a problem with Happeh, you know this is a ludicrous and shameful position to take. Any scientist might spend months or years examining one tiny facet of one subject. I have plainly said I have been at this for 5 years. But for some reason, guys calling me names are experts in a week or two. Why is this ludicrous and shameful attitude applied to me? The only reason that makes any sense is personal reasons.
This is science. People need to take their emotional needs and games, their submission/dominance games, and go to some other forum where they play games. This forum is for scientists trying to learn about the world around them.
James R said:
Here we go. The scientist James has decided that his training in understanding of the human body qualifies him to say what is and is not useful. James says he is a psychologist, so I really do not understand where his body expertise came from. I have been studying the human body for 10 or 15 years. But for some reason, your week or two's consideration of the pictures has more validity than my 10 or 15 years of study.
What you are doing is lableling scientific evidence as "clutter". Admit it. That is what you did. You asked for evidence. Then when it is provided, you want it to stop because it is "clutter".
You are not a scientist. You don't know observe and conclude. You are a psychologist who has been trained to play mental games with people to get what you want. If that includes lying, disregarding the basics of science, observe and conclude, so what? Your training is mental manipulation, regardless of the truth or accuracy of anything that is going on.
James R said:
Admit it James. Underneath that calm cool psychologist facade, you are just some guy who wants to get rid of me. Tell me. Exactly what does it cost you for me to post in this thread? Does it cost you money? I see posts that are pages long from Buddha trying to understand his gayness. Why do you allow that to go on?
Because Buddha is not proving that you and the rest of the clowns here don't know squat. I am proving my assertions. I am proving you are all wrong, so there is a problem with me. Buddha hasn't said a word that challenges the authority or power of any of you, so he can make 100 pages of posts if he pleases.
This is all about me refusing to bow down to your and the rest of the psychos foolish and morally wrong attempts to control and dominate me. It is not my fault my mind is stronger than yours. That I know how psycho guys work. By lying and deceit and mental manipulation. You finally met someone who you cannot control, and you will go thru any mental contortions you can to try to justify getting me to stop. If the other patrons of this forums are exposed to me, they too will learn how to nullify the attacks of psychos.
James R said:
And here is the real James. Here is the real reason for talking to me about my posts. You are upset about that other thread and you want revenge. What does my feelings about women have to do with my Theory? Why, nothing at all.
It is a morally slimy act of a deceitful psycho who is trying to dominate, put down, or mentally damage another person. Those are your motivations. Revenge. Not all this concern about me posting here in the forums.
James R said:
I expect honesty. Now that you have plainly admitted that all of this is nothing more than you using your mod powers to get revenge for a statement you do not care for, what else is there for me to say?
All you adult psychologist posturing is lies. Just like I said. This is a personal power trip for you. To get your way, whatever the cost. Personal courtesy or honorable actions be damned.
James R said:
So. Then you are just another one of the crazies like Leopold, who cuts and pastes psycho terms from Wikipedia? You just make up these hurtful things to say to other people? Why? What need inside of you does it fulfill to make psycho judgements against other people when you are not qualified to do so?
James R said:
I already did. You are a small man that is angry with me about the child rapist thread. Since you cannot "get" me over in the child rapist thread, you are coming over here to get me somewhere else. You can justify publicly that I am "using the thread as a blog", and do what you will.
I have been thru this. I have seen people jump thru hoops to justify abandoning forums rules and common courtesy in order to get me. People mess with me. I stomp them. Instead of taking their medicine, they started it after all, they then do anything they can to get even.
I have had people post total lies about me. I have had people make up false quotes by me. I have had people put slanderous lies in their signatures about me, something you have allowed a member here to do for two weeks at least. I have watched people scour the internet looking for some kind of dirt they can throw at me. I have watched people get up a lynch mob against me. I have had people tell me to die or commit suicide. I have had people threaten to come beat me up. I have had people post my name, address and a picture of my house on the internet.
Most people are morons who act like the scum of the earth. Most of them are talking animals, not thinking human beings.
People are all the same. When things don't go your way, you resort to violence, deceit, evil, to get back at me. None of you have the honor or courage or manliness to admit that you were bested and to live with it.
Last edited:
Hercules Rockefeller said:
Ya. I don't know how James and Snakelord and those guys can keep talking about how scientists are trustworthy. That is just two of the latest liars. I didn't even post the story about the scientists paid to lie about Viagra for Merck. The studies about how anti depressants cause suicides. How medicines for ADD cause children to suicide. How new medicines are no more effective than old medicines. Doctors only prescribe the new drugs because they are bribed by the corporations.
I bet if I went looking, I could find 50 stories about lying scientists. You try to do your best to wake people up that they should believe and trust themselves if they want to succeed in life and it can be very hard. The brainwashing that they should believe anything a person in a suit or white smock tells them is almost cemented into their brain. Their self confidence and ability to think has been so damaged in the public schools that most of them can never recover to the state of a fully thinking human being.
Ophiolite
Valued Senior Member
Happeh,
if you are serious about wanting to convince others of your theory consider these questions:
Do all people, from time to time, tilt their heads?
Do all people, from time to time, favour one side or the other?
Do all people, from time to time, twist their faces?
Please answer these three questions, then we may proceed to phase two.
if you are serious about wanting to convince others of your theory consider these questions:
Do all people, from time to time, tilt their heads?
Do all people, from time to time, favour one side or the other?
Do all people, from time to time, twist their faces?
Please answer these three questions, then we may proceed to phase two.
Uhh.. nobody has refused. Everyone here has looked at the evidence and made their own decision that your explanations are in fact wrong.
Ooh.. that many? (lol).
I would personally just advise and urge you to go and see a professional. It is abundantly clear that you have some problems, and I can guarantee you you'll feel better once they have been resolved. You'll probably see this as an attack, as rudeness, evil, or label me a hurter once more. I am in fact just trying to help you.
Happeh:
No. I am saying you've made that particular point, and making it another hundred times won't add anything to your argument.
Wrong again. In fact, I have said the exact opposite many times - that examining your photos tells us nothing about whether you are right or wrong. That's why posting more photos will be a waste of everybody's time.
You obviously missed the post where I specifically said I am NOT a professional psychologist.
Which medical school did you attend? Which books have you read on anatomy and the like? Or, do you consider looking at people and imagining things "studying"?
Happeh, I'm a moderator of this forum. If I wanted to get rid of you, I could simply ban you, and you'd be gone. I've had requests from other people to ban you, yet you're not banned. What does that suggest to you?
I see significant similarities between yourself and Buddha1. If you can see flaws in his posting style, it might be a good exercise for you to decide what is wrong with his posts, then ask the same questions of your own theory. Do you believe Buddha, regarding the unnaturalness of heterosexuality? If not, why not? Next, consider why people don't believe you. The reasons are probably the same.
What if you're wrong about that?
So far, Happeh, I don't think I've edited or deleted a single one of your posts. So, I'm hardly using my mod powers to silence you.
No. I am saying you've made that particular point, and making it another hundred times won't add anything to your argument.
Wrong again. In fact, I have said the exact opposite many times - that examining your photos tells us nothing about whether you are right or wrong. That's why posting more photos will be a waste of everybody's time.
You obviously missed the post where I specifically said I am NOT a professional psychologist.
Which medical school did you attend? Which books have you read on anatomy and the like? Or, do you consider looking at people and imagining things "studying"?
Happeh, I'm a moderator of this forum. If I wanted to get rid of you, I could simply ban you, and you'd be gone. I've had requests from other people to ban you, yet you're not banned. What does that suggest to you?
I see significant similarities between yourself and Buddha1. If you can see flaws in his posting style, it might be a good exercise for you to decide what is wrong with his posts, then ask the same questions of your own theory. Do you believe Buddha, regarding the unnaturalness of heterosexuality? If not, why not? Next, consider why people don't believe you. The reasons are probably the same.
What if you're wrong about that?
So far, Happeh, I don't think I've edited or deleted a single one of your posts. So, I'm hardly using my mod powers to silence you.
- Status