Masturbation is for Losers

[Happeh]

Jackinworld.com is correct.

Happeh probably works as an undercover scam artist.

Huh?

Tell you what guys. Anyone wants to come visit me, I will prove it to you in person. You think I didn't notice how you all ran away from my remark I can prove it to you in person?

Come on by. Any time. I will prove that I am right and you are wrong. There is one condition though. After I prove to you I am right, you must come back here to the sciforums and publicly say

"I went to Happeh and he proved to me, in person, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that what he says has validity".

And you must sign a statement to that effect I can put on my website. Stop all this hot air and put your money where your mouth is. If you really think I am wrong, you should be chomping at the bit to rush over here so you can crow about how you vanquished that liar and fraud Happeh.

 

[cole grey]

If I was a doctor with a certificate on the wall, you would believe me. Not because I had evidence, just because I had a piece of paper with a gold leaf star printed on it...
...Your own two eyes tell you the other men's heads are all dented or angular or thin. You are afraid because they evidence of your eyes is overriding your mental determination to reject anything that Happeh says.

First - maybe there is another reason why certain people look the way they do.
Maybe they eat better food and take supplements. That is only one of many possible factors that need to be included.
Your use of the word evidence in the above is COMPLETELY out of place.
Second - I might tend towards agreeing with someone who was basing their assessments on a theory backed up by scientific, experimental evidence, as many medical theories are. But no, I wouldn't just agree because they have "authority", they had better do some tests before I agree with a doctor's analysis.

Are you really obtuse enough to think the "evidence" of your eyes is completely reliable? Considering what I said about other reasons why people may look different from each other?
Your claims of "authority" are laughable, considering your complete lack of verification.

I'm giving you one more chance to post reasonably, using proper english meanings for your words, and not making ridiculous assumptions about the way I think, before I write you off as a kook. I mean it this time.

Edit -
p.s. where do you live? And if i show up to see your "evidence", you had best be prepared to take a serious beating if you invade my personal space with any sexual wierdness.

 

[leopold]

"I went to Happeh and he proved to me, in person, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that what he says has validity".

snakelord has offered you 1,000,000 pounds to prove "your theory" happeh
and just like he said "all of a sudden money wouldn't mean a thing"


you mentioned in one of your earlier posts "you have my word"
i seriously doubt if anyone on this board believes anything you say
that would realy bother me if the people here didn't believe me.

 

[leopold]

You think I didn't notice how you all ran away from my remark I can prove it to you in person?

we all notice that snakelord still has his money

 

[(Q)]

Come on by. Any time. I will prove that I am right and you are wrong. There is one condition though. After I prove to you I am right, you must come back here to the sciforums and publicly say

"I went to Happeh and he proved to me, in person, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that what he says has validity".

That's fine, but when someone comes and proves you wrong, which is most likely to happen, what will you do?

 

[Happeh]

Are you really obtuse enough to think the "evidence" of your eyes is completely reliable?

Sure. I am just like any other expert without an authority conferring that status on him. An expert hunter. An expert dancer. An expert on cloud formation. All those things that people become experts in by dint of nothing more than being alive, and studying an area of interest for years.

Happens all the time.

I'm giving you one more chance to post reasonably, using proper english meanings for your words, and not making ridiculous assumptions about the way I think, before I write you off as a kook. I mean it this time.

It won't work. I built up my way of describing things for regular people. Not demanding scientists. I just realized this morning I am contaminating myself by talking to you guys. No regular person will read anything written for scientists. You are a small special group with your own needs. I was reading some stuff I wrote after talking to you all and I hated it. I erased it all. It was all true, but it was dry, boring, ennumerated, science talk that no one wants to read.

Edit -
p.s. where do you live? And if i show up to see your "evidence", you had best be prepared to take a serious beating if you invade my personal space with any sexual wierdness.

Of course I will do "sexual weirdness". This theory is all about sex. I am gonna be all over your sexual area saying "look at this, look here, see what I mean right here?". Just exactly like a doctor examining you and touching everywhere. You are gonna need to show me a boner or else how can I tell if it points to the left or right or spirals around like a candy cane?

 

[Happeh]

Come on by. Any time. I will prove that I am right and you are wrong. There is one condition though. After I prove to you I am right, you must come back here to the sciforums and publicly say

"I went to Happeh and he proved to me, in person, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that what he says has validity".

That's fine, but when someone comes and proves you wrong, which is most likely to happen, what will you do?

Publicly admit I am wrong.

 

[Happeh]

Maybe a completely different angle will convince you something is going on. Here is a picture of Tariq Aziz. That ambassador from Iraq.

As you can see, Tariq Azziz is now in a wheelchair. His USA captors have treated him poorly so he changed from the ambassador before the war, to what you see in the chair now.

Being Americans, they of course have refused him all medical care. It is reported he will die soon. They will not free him or allow outisde doctors to see him. They want him dead before he can go to trial.

My point for the political comments being, higher ups in the USA know about Happeh Theory to. Or maybe it is the Israelis. Depends on if they took charge of Aziz from their tools the Americans or not. They have used this knowledge to cause what has happened to Mr Aziz.

What exactly has happened to Mr Aziz? Well, his right arm of course. Look at it. It looks like the wing of a bird or something. It is all twisted around and pointing itself.

Mr Aziz'zsarm has the classic pose of someone suffering from a stroke. A stroke is in the brain and supposedly doctors know all about what causes it etc. Except they lie all the time so you can't really trust them.

Look at this picture

What do you see? You see Tariq Aziz next to Cheney and Rumsfeld.

What else do you see? You see that Tariq Azziz has a curled up right arm from a stroke. And you see that Rumsfeld and Cheney also have their right arm curled up in a very very similar way.

That is because the same things involved in stroke are involved in causing the symptoms of Happeh Theory.

The sign of the loser, the sign Rumsfeld and Cheney are making, is made by people with an underlying condition affecting them. That underlying condition is the exact same condition that causes stroke. Or blindness in one eye. Or a bad arm and a bad leg.

If you think I am wrong, why do people make the sign of the loser? Rumsfeld and Cheney surely are not doing it on purpose. Not on national TV where they are trying to convince people that the USA needs to murder muslims.

 

[Happeh]

I think all those letters I wrote to scientists are having an effect. I told you someone would steal my ideas.

Happeh Theory says that excessive masturbation causes Alzheimers disease. I have written alot about this on my sites and around the internet. I have pointed out in my writings that people fall down and break their hips in old age. Happeh Theory explains this also. You all know that I say "atrophy" as in breaking down. Any thinking scientist could put the ideas together and find a reasonable avenue of reasearch.

If Happeh Theory says Alzheimers and Broken Hips are a result of atrophy of they body, how do you reverse atropy of the body, and thereby reduce atrophy of the brain, Alzheimers, and atrophy of the hips?

The answer is obvious to any real scientist. Exercise. Exercise reverses the act of atrophy of organic structures in a living animal.



Older people who exercised three or more times a week showed a lower risk of developing Alzheimer's and other types of dementia, a new study suggests.

Light activity such as walking for 15 minutes seemed to help delay onset of dementia among healthy people over age 65, the researchers report in Tuesday's issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Those who were the frailest at the start of the study showed the most benefit, meaning people really should "use it after you start to lose it," to slow age-related problems in thinking, said Dr. Eric Larson, the study's lead author and director of Group Health Cooperative's Center for Health Studies in Seattle.

The researchers followed 1,740 people ages 65 and older who showed no signs of dementia on tests of mental function performed at the start of the study in 1994.

The participants' reported on their health every two years for six years.

No signs of dementia were found in 1,185 people, 77 per cent of whom said they exercised three or more times a week.

Among the 158 people with signs of dementia, 67 per cent said they did not exercise regularly. The others died or did not participate in the entire study.

Since participants weren't followed until death, the study's authors can't tell if exercise helped to prevent dementia.

http://www.cbc.ca/story/science/national/2006/01/16/dementia-exercise060116.html


I own U guys. One of you should have taken my request for a scientist to write up what I say in science speak so we could submit it to the government or venture capitalists and get rich and famous. By the time you do it now, they will have stolen my hints and figured it all out themselves.

 

[leopold]

It won't work. I built up my way of describing things for regular people.

we already know that happeh
is that why you ignore me cause i'm a regular person?

 

[leopold]

I own U guys. One of you should have taken my request for a scientist to write up what I say in science speak so we could submit it to the government or venture capitalists and get rich and famous. By the time you do it now, they will have stolen my hints and figured it all out themselves.

we offered you 1,000,000 pounds to prove your theory
it isn't our fault you are dumb, and a fraud, and a loser, and a nutter

 

[SnakeLord]

Sure. I am just like any other expert

No you're not - not even close to it. Other experts have data, results of studies conducted, evidence to back up their claims. You have nothing but some pictures that point to nothing out of the ordinary.

I own U guys

In your deluded little dreamworld perhaps.

 

[cole grey]

I don't have to show you to know what the shape is and that it is free of lumps.

You are a bad man.

Now I understand why you like to teach your theory to kids and why you like to show them your "evidence".

You are a bad man.

 

[leopold]

when he first started posting to this thread he said he could tell by looking at a picture of your face if you masturbated or not
now it seems he has to look at your boner too

 

[Happeh]

I don't have to show you to know what the shape is and that it is free of lumps.

You are a bad man.

Now I understand why you like to teach your theory to kids and why you like to show them your "evidence".

You are a bad man.

That is really funny. How old are you?

 

[Happeh]

That's right. Keep hiding from the picture of Tariq Aziz with a stroke, and the guys making the sign of the loser. Keep avoiding talking about every single point I raise.

Just continue denying everything. Continue making the little sniping comments that say nothing.

You know I have something. You do not have the courage to admit that you were wrong and I am right. I don't know why people are like that. I admit it if I am wrong. I think it is because I do not play submission/dominance games.

I can't think of a bigger waste of a life. Playing games seeing who is top dog. Why do that when you can spend 80 years learning all about the world around you? 80 years you might touch on 2 or 3 subjects if you are lucky. Subjects you might claim expertise in.

Instead you want to play "who is king of the dogpile". That is fine. For other people. This is science forums. It says so right at the top. We scientists are supposed to forgo our emotions and wasteful human social games in order to pursue science. At least that is what they used to say back in the 50's and 60's.

I still think they have mentally sabotaged you guys into being failures. Thinking you cannot do science without a lab and authorities giving you permission. Thinking science is a label you put on yourself instead of your actions and thoughts proving you are a scientist. Being ignorant of the basic science rules of observe, record, conclude.

I wish it was different.

 

[leopold]

That is really funny. How old are you?

that's really funny. because we ask you two or three times how old you are and we still don't know

 

[leopold]

We scientists are supposed to forgo our emotions and wasteful human social games in order to pursue science.

you are not a scientist happeh
there isn't a scientist on this planet that will say they can look at a picture of someone and tell if they masturbate

and if you read the thread you will notice you have not produced any credentials.

 

[leopold]

I wish it was different.

i wish you would take snakelords 1,000,000 pound challenge

 

[stretched]

Happeh is having fun at the expense of all your time.