alexb123 said:
Charles Thanks for adding this view of Marriage as a form of income and control on the part of the church. You seem to know the subject well. But are you talking about the Church or the Bible? Is Marriage another Christmas? By this I mean the Bible does not ask for it or preach it but it has become part of the Christian Tradition?
whats important about how marriage is depicted by the bible isnt that it is portrayed as a specifically Christian rite, its that the church does not condemn marriage. the ritual of marriage preexisted Christianity, and i would argue that it was such an ingrained part of the social order of the time, that for the bible to make much comment about it in either a negative or positive way would have been ruffling feathers.
therefore what early christianity sought to do was gradually absorb the ritual and add to it their own type of religious meaning. Think of it, marriage is not specifically condemned or supported in the bible, but one of the first miracles performed by jesus takes place at a wedding, therefore giving meaning to the event and specifically setting up an instance where the bible could have come out against marriage if they wanted to. but instead, what they chose to do was make it the backdrop for the occurence of a miracle. thats a nice indirect way of supporting it and saying "hey look weddings have always had a specifically christian kind of significance because of this".
the early church took it upon itself to establish marriage as a sacrament, which is sort of another way of saying it is a crucial step on the path toward communication and reconciliation with God. in addition to this, by the church absorbing the ritual of marriage and infusing the ceremony itself with its own specific flourishes, they make christian marriage into a ceremony where the two people to be wed devote themselves to God in front of a large crowd of their family, friends, and other important people. this serves to reinforce peoples commitment and submission to the authority of the church and its ability to create binding social arangements as much as it reinforces their commitment to each other.
I think what im getting at here is that, much like christmas, although marriage is not specifically called for in the bible, it exists as the result of the development of church dogma, for whatever reason. there are many events that christians celebrate that are not specifically mandated by the bible as celebrated events. whats important is that, if you are catholic, then you must trust in which events the church has determined to be important through its interpretation of the bible, since you are not meant to understand it yourself. and if you are a protestant, then youre beliefs are founded on Catholic dogma and dependent on it up until about the 1590's, so since marriage was already well established by then, it doesnt make much difference whether the bible specifically celebrates it or not. all that matters is that it does not forbid it, tradition fills in the rest of the gaps.
in addition to that i would like to say that the bible clearly in some ways speaks on behalf of marriage. especially since one of the ten commandments involves an implied rule against committing adultery. if god didnt think marriage was ok, why would adultery ever be forbidden to begin with?