Xaositecte
Registered Member
In many an arguement about religion, I've come down to one simple point..
Thiest: "God exists"
Atheist: "Prove it."
Inevitably, the 'Proof' is something about how you can look around you, see the world for the complex thing it is and how can it POSSIBLY have been the work of random chance (If they're big on creationism\evolution) or, possibly, something will be said about how "faith" is the only proof you need.
The thing is, there's more than one religion, there are a LOT more than one religion, and a great many of them have contradictory doctrines.. Since essentially all of them have the same "proof" for their validity, each of them is, in theory, equally valid.
Given that, and the fact that many say every other religion is wrong (and since the religion is valid, we're going on faith everything they say is truth, then every religion is incorrect), why is anyone supposed to believe that ANY religion is correct?
Thiest: "God exists"
Atheist: "Prove it."
Inevitably, the 'Proof' is something about how you can look around you, see the world for the complex thing it is and how can it POSSIBLY have been the work of random chance (If they're big on creationism\evolution) or, possibly, something will be said about how "faith" is the only proof you need.
The thing is, there's more than one religion, there are a LOT more than one religion, and a great many of them have contradictory doctrines.. Since essentially all of them have the same "proof" for their validity, each of them is, in theory, equally valid.
Given that, and the fact that many say every other religion is wrong (and since the religion is valid, we're going on faith everything they say is truth, then every religion is incorrect), why is anyone supposed to believe that ANY religion is correct?