Wiki.Today the idea of aether, what Albert Michelson called "one of the grandest generalizations of modern science", is regarded as a superseded scientific theory
Okay, so they feel that space-time needs renaming.We give space-time a name, to differentiate it from the concept of a void of nothingness. That name is Aether
And then the outrageous claims...No other theory has ever come close to matching the scope and promise of the Aether Physics Model. Beyond a revolutionary paradigm of the fundamental laws and taking all the disciplines of science to a new level, practical applications of availing the Aether could include benefits to humanity such as anti-gravity, clean energy, and fully developing biotechnology and nanotechnology
And then the woo woo spiritual bit.To integrate these two aspects of truth, we need a physics, which both quantifies physical existence and feelings. The Aether Physics Model provides this integrated physics.
Pythagorean Lambdoma. The great philosopher Pythagoras lived about 2500 years ago, yet his name still inspires people, today. Barbara discovered his work when reading Manly P. Hall's book, The Secret Teachings of All Ages, in the 1970's.
Barbara's perspective on Pythagoras' personality and education is revealing. She sees Pythagoras as a Master or Avatar, similar to Jesus
Crank physics indeed.Hmm, it looks to be crank physics. ...
'We have successfully unified all the forces.' You see this as crank? A false statement?Hmm, it looks to be crank physics.
So a new lexicon is not needed? As I see it, it has not been defined properly.Okay, so they feel that space-time needs renaming.
You must start with a theory to prove something right?And then the outrageous claims...
Is that their or your supposition? It being spiritual?And then the woo woo spiritual bit.
Plus the links to
More specifically the phrase "No other theory has ever come close to matching the scope and promise [of ours]" is standard crank claim.'We have successfully unified all the forces.' You see this as crank? A false statement?
Why dump a perfectly good (an understood) term to reuse a name that was discredited decades ago?So a new lexicon is not needed? As I see it, it has not been defined properly.
You start with observation. Not sure what you're getting at here.You must start with a theory to prove something right?
The claim is that truth comes in two "flavours": what you feel to be true and what you can prove to be true. Physics, by definition, doesn't deal in emotions.Is that their or your supposition? It being spiritual?
They suggest that the speed of light could be a quantum value.
Do any real physicists say that?
The properties of the Aether as explained in the Aether Physics Model are:I did some reading about it. Seems very complicated stuff. A buddy asked if its real/natural? I dont know what he he means by this. Maybe someone can elaborate about its properties?
Dirac considered the relationship between magnetic and electric charges in the 30s.Further, nobody thought to quantify the magnetic charge as a unique dimension along with the electrostatic charge. These two types of charges are different in geometry and also have a reciprocal relationship between them.
Demonstrate it can successfully derive the differential cross section for electron+positron -> muon + antimuon.The Aether Physics Model uniquely presents a Unified Force Theory that is entirely expressed in terms of Newtonian type force laws.
You fail to provide any evidence therefore there is no reason to believe.Although Western science shuns the Aether Physics Model because they incorrectly believe the Aether does not exist
And the nut Paul Dixon here has on his CV that he's been nominated for a Nobel Prize 3 times, even though such nominations were by himself for himself and he has no work of any kind related to physics published. Or Myron Evans who made up his own university and gave him and his pals professorships and honorary degrees in his 'pet theory'. Its easy to impress yourself, that's why there's peer review, you have to convince others too.the Aether Physics Model has been nominated for an Iranian science prize (by Iranian physicists). It is likely the Iranians are going to take the lead in understanding and developing the Aether Physics Model.
Translation: "Here poochy poochy, jump through this hoop. When you are done, I'll have more for you to jump through until you get tired and complain, then we will ban you from the group."Demonstrate it can successfully derive the differential cross section for electron+positron -> muon + antimuon.
You failed to ask for any evidence, and therefore you didn't receive it. But I'll bet you don't want to hear it in the first place. You have already taken aim with your sight and are ready to pull the trigger.You fail to provide any evidence therefore there is no reason to believe.
The old straw man argument gets them every time. I concede. Your excellent wisdom has made a fool of me and now I will cower into the corner while you stand valiantly upon your pedestal admiring yourself. And it wasn't even necessary for you to ask one single scientific question about the actual theory. You are amazing. :bravo:And the nut Paul Dixon here has on his CV that he's been nominated for a Nobel Prize 3 times, even though such nominations were by himself for himself and he has no work of any kind related to physics published. Or Myron Evans who made up his own university and gave him and his pals professorships and honorary degrees in his 'pet theory'. Its easy to impress yourself, that's why there's peer review, you have to convince others too.
You are setting up the parameters for the argument. Let's first examine the parameters.Suppose the aether exists, and is 'responsible' for the finite speed of light so that: without a 'resistance' to the flow of light particles, they would have infinite velocity through a medium with zero resistance to the 'flow' of energy.
So you must have, if a force is acting on light particles, something like $$ F\;=\; \alpha c $$, where the RHS has units of Newtons. So $$ \alpha $$ must have units kg/s
OK. This is what I read late last night. However i need major elaboration on it. From what i can remember it is a subatomic particle of electrons and it has been studied. So if it is studied, does it make it a 'real' element? Im lost. please help: Quantum Aether Physics Moddel
You claimed you have a unique unified theory. I want you to demonstrate as much. If you haven't got the work ready to present then you shouldn't be making those claims. If you don't want to jump through that particular hoop (the differential cross section one) then simply provide a full and detailed analysis and development of your 'theory'.Translation: "Here poochy poochy, jump through this hoop. When you are done, I'll have more for you to jump through until you get tired and complain, then we will ban you from the group."
I want evidence, I asked for a specific case which is pretty simple on the scale of things. Whenever I ask people for a demonstration their work can do as they claim I ask things which can be done with minimal knowledge of the mainstream. Things like the differential cross section of QED processes or the orbit of Mercury can be done with 4th year level physics or below. This isn't a difficult problem, on the scale of things.You failed to ask for any evidence, and therefore you didn't receive it. But I'll bet you don't want to hear it in the first place. You have already taken aim with your sight and are ready to pull the trigger.
I asked, you refused to provide. And my comment was to demonstrate that Iranians giving prizes to themselves is hardly a sign its right. The important thing is to be able to convince others. I'm requesting you try to do so and you seem to be trying to avoid backing up your claims.The old straw man argument gets them every time. I concede. Your excellent wisdom has made a fool of me and now I will cower into the corner while you stand valiantly upon your pedestal admiring yourself. And it wasn't even necessary for you to ask one single scientific question about the actual theory. You are amazing. :bravo:
OK. This is what I read late last night. Quantum Aether Physics Moddel
The theory is quite developed and is too much to post in a simple message on this list, although, I did start to do so in a message, above. If you would like to read the paper on the Unified Force Theory, you'll have to wait until I make 20 posts to this foolish forum. I can't post links, yet. Or you can type the url in from this "unified dash force dash theory dot com."You claimed you have a unique unified theory. I want you to demonstrate as much.
What you asked for was something of interest to you, which is not a part of the presented theory. Did anybody ask the same thing from Isaac Newton or Charles Coulomb? It should have been simple for them, too.I asked for a specific case which is pretty simple on the scale of things.
You didn't ask me for a demonstration of my work, so don't go there.Whenever I ask people for a demonstration their work...
Ask me for a cure for cancer, or how to build a microchip. Ask me for whatever you want, but if I ask you to actually review my work, will you listen? Will you look at what I am actually presenting? Or are you going to be like the many fools who are too lazy to investigate the actual theory being presented and just ask a plethora of unrelated questions?I asked, you refused to provide.
Again, you are off base. I am not Iranian. I am a thirteenth generation American of Scottish descent. My father is a retired high ranking official with the US DOD. You demonstrated nothing but your ignorance.And my comment was to demonstrate that Iranians giving prizes to themselves is hardly a sign its right.
Once again, you weren't even the slightest bit interested in my physics work. You just came off with guns fully loaded and ready to pull the trigger. As for me having to convince you or anybody else of what you choose not to believe, that is not my responsibility. You have a right to investigate my work, or ignore it. It is just as much your responsibility to listen as it is for me to talk.The important thing is to be able to convince others. I'm requesting you try to do so and you seem to be trying to avoid backing up your claims.