Krishna existed therefore Jesus did

Hey, Med Woman, you are apparently ignorant of the fact that as more and more archaeological discoveries roll in, the Bible continues to be shown to be by far the most accurate and broad ranging history book ever written.
 
It has never shown any inaccuracy, and is constantly being vindicated with new archaeological discoveries, a truly amazing book, and Genesis 10 tells us the origins of the people groups, born out by etymology and ancient history, a must read for all SERIOUS students of ancient history.
 
It has never shown any inaccuracy

It most certainly has. However, your statement does not answer my question. You said it has been shown to be the most accurate...

Support that statement. Shown by who?

and is constantly being vindicated with new archaeological discoveries

Such as?

and Genesis 10 tells us the origins of the people groups, born out by etymology and ancient history, a must read for all SERIOUS students of ancient history.

Now you're being silly.

Support your claims.
 
Pretty funny that you have made no claims, so what have you made?

I haven't "made" anything. I'm merely asking you to support the claims you continue to make but continually fail to support. From giants to biblical veracity to whether Jesus outranks Plato on the evidence scale.

Now, once you get over whatever it was that you found funny, and whatever it is that makes you leave pointless little statements, how about you get to the crunch and support your claims?
 
I've read the thread from start to finish and I don't see you coming even close to beginning to support your claims. All I do find is you making pointless little one-liners like the one I am now responding to. None of these one liners actually say anything, they just skirt the issue because quite clearly you cannot support any of the blithering tripe that farts it's way out of your hole.

Might I ask your age?
 
I,A,C.: where, did you hide these so called posts, in your head.
 
I've read the thread from start to finish and I don't see you coming even close to beginning to support your claims. All I do find is you making pointless little one-liners like the one I am now responding to. None of these one liners actually say anything, they just skirt the issue because quite clearly you cannot support any of the blithering tripe that farts it's way out of your hole.

Might I ask your age?

Judging by his intelligent posts...I would say from 8-11 yrs of age.:rolleyes:
 
Any chance you could answer the question?

How old are you. (Yes, clearly you're older and wiser than me, but clearly you haven't yet learnt what a question is and what you're supposed to do with them).
 
Back
Top