James R: The S.A.M Issue

Status
Not open for further replies.
(Q) said:
I'm sure you'll find, as most do, that the Islamic propagandists on this forum will use that pathetic excuse on anyone and everyone who doesn't agree with their Islamic bigotry and delusions.
Click to expand...

I found that out a long time ago. It is like any NEWS in a bad light should not be posted here, especially not by a white poster. I opened maybe 2-3 since I got here and was accused right off the bat of being racist. I was told that I only posted the story because I was racist against Muslims and was only starting trouble.

I said that I posted the stories because it made headlines and was utterly disgusting but even then I was accused of having an agenda. :bugeye:

YET....Sam can post whatever the hell she wants and we should just sit back and accept that she is merely just posting World News. :rolleyes:
 
shorty_37 said:
I found that out a long time ago. It is like any NEWS in a bad light should not be posted here, especially not by a white poster. I opened maybe 2-3 since I got here and was accused right off the bat of being racist. I was told that I only posted the story because I was racist against Muslims and was only starting trouble.

I said that I posted the stories because it made headlines and was utterly disgusting but even then I was accused of having an agenda. :bugeye:

YET....Sam can post whatever the hell she wants and we should just sit back and accept that she is merely just posting World News. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

How did you frame it? if I remember correctly you framed as a evil act done by a muslim sole because they were a muslim as if only a muslim could do such a thing which is bigoted now if you framed as an evil act commited by a muslim and left it as that no bigotry.
 
pjdude1219 said:
How did you frame it? if I remember correctly you framed as a evil act done by a muslim sole because they were a muslim as if only a muslim could do such a thing which is bigoted now if you framed as an evil act commited by a muslim and left it as that no bigotry.
Click to expand...

As I remember you didn't care about the story or my explanations. You were merely pissed off because I posted something about Muslims in a disgusting light. I think you are a little touchy on the subject and the mere mention of Muslims doing anything wrong, throws you into a tizzy.
 
shorty_37 said:
I found that out a long time ago. It is like any NEWS in a bad light should not be posted here, especially not by a white poster. I opened maybe 2-3 since I got here and was accused right off the bat of being racist. I was told that I only posted the story because I was racist against Muslims and was only starting trouble.
Click to expand...

We can ignore any accusations of racism or bigotry from the Islamic propagandists here as that's pretty much all they ever spout themselves. And, if you disagree with their racism and bigotry and lies, you are labeled a Muslim basher. It's all their ever able to muster and all it demonstrates is their intense hatred for anything non-Islamic.

YET....Sam can post whatever the hell she wants and we should just sit back and accept that she is merely just posting World News. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Of course, she along with her troupe here are protected and nurtured. Sciforums has become a haven for them as they are free to post their bigotry and hatred.

If anyone, blame the admins. They created this whole scenario and are now knee-deep in their own doo-doo.
 
shorty_37 said:
As I remember you didn't care about the story or my explanations. You were merely pissed off because I posted something about Muslims in a disgusting light. I think you are a little touchy on the subject and the mere mention of Muslims doing anything wrong, throws you into a tizzy.
Click to expand...

Your explanations only showed I was correct and know your trying to make me look like an asshole for calling you out on what was a hit job. I don't give a fuck a you portray anyone in a negative light so long as its done in an honest manner. Even now your proving my point. Rather than try and defend your self by saying no i didn't frame that way, your first reaction was to attack me. in my expierence that usually the sign of someone who knows their wrong but doesn't want to admit it.
 
(Q) said:
We can ignore any accusations of racism or bigotry from the Islamic propagandists here as that's pretty much all they ever spout themselves. And, if you disagree with their racism and bigotry and lies, you are labeled a Muslim basher. It's all their ever able to muster and all it demonstrates is their intense hatred for anything non-Islamic.
Click to expand...
Rant rant rant with no substance just attacks on those you don't like.



Of course, she along with her troupe here are protected and nurtured. Sciforums has become a haven for them as they are free to post their bigotry and hatred.
Click to expand...
so persacution while people like you get to shit on us/them is being protected

If anyone, blame the admins. They created this whole scenario and are now knee-deep in their own doo-doo.
Click to expand...

this I can agree with more concerned with having their jobs be easy than doing right.
 
pjdude1219 said:
You had a point???
Click to expand...

Yes, but you ignored it in favor of viewing me through your opaque glasses as a Muslim basher. Clearly, everything I say is an attempt to oppress you in some way, although I can't imagine how that's possible. The only difference is the fact that you belong to the Islamic cult, which is in itself a double-edged sword, which you and every other Islamic propagandist on this forum wields.
 
pjdude1219 said:
Rant rant rant with no substance just attacks on those you don't like.
Click to expand...

Lies lies lies from the victimized Islamic propagandist.

so persacution while people like you get to shit on us/them is being protected
Click to expand...

More lies. It looks like I didn't have to go very far to point them out.
 
(Q) said:
Yes, but you ignored it in favor of viewing me through your opaque glasses as a Muslim basher.
Click to expand...
well when you go out of your way to make the shoe fit.
Clearly, everything I say is an attempt to oppress you in some way, although I can't imagine how that's possible.
Click to expand...
no clearly everything you say is attempt to inflame somebody you just like to target muslims.
The only difference is the fact that you belong to the Islamic cult, which is in itself a double-edged sword, which you and every other Islamic propagandist on this forum wields.
Click to expand...

Showing your extreme laziness again. I'm not a muslim.
 
Actually, I remember quite clearly having been accused of being a bigot and a liar by pjdude1219, too, but honestly, I couldn't recall having done such things. Almost the whole thread was cluttered with him calling each and everyone who disagreed with him, or had a different look at history a liar, and a bigot. So, I then choose to not reply to him in that thread any more as all he did was throwing unsubstantiated accusations, ad hominems to support his credibility, and honestly, there was no point in proceeding the chat with him about this particular subject as he's already set his mind on it, and was not willing to view it from a different perspective.
 
PsychoTropicPuppy said:
No reading comprehension?

Besides, who isn't a hypocrite?
Click to expand...

S.A.M. said:
I think Ben is demonstrating what presenting both sides of an argument looks like. Or isn't anyone allowed to have more then one opinion on a topic?
Click to expand...


here is how that particular topic commenced

regioncapture1.jpg


i go on to question ben about that....





he and i pose similar questions to james. look at ben's opening line in the second graphic and compare to his question in the first graphic
yet when ben addresses me he disregards the implications of his question and speaks for james

why then did he ask the question in the first place if he knew the answer?
ben contradicts himself

dealing now with the post you two have an issue with..

regioncapturej.jpg


the debate example is shitty anyway because implicit in any debate is that one picks a side and is biased as hell. you cannot make the opposing case
so ben really can only refer to a venue outside the debate forum

so what does james mean, ben?

you two comment as well please
 
Last edited:
pjdude1219 said:
well when you go out of your way to make the shoe fit.
Click to expand...

I may go out of my way to point out the hypocrisy of a cult, but that in no way has anything to do with you or any other theist. The fact that theists make it their own personal issue is not my problem, yet to them I've become a person basher instead of an ideology basher.

no clearly everything you say is attempt to inflame somebody you just like to target muslims.
Click to expand...

I target cult ideology, Islam being a militant cult. Muslims seem to have a problem with that. Why is that my fault?

Showing your extreme laziness again. I'm not a muslim.
Click to expand...

Did they take away your membership card?
 
I'm not disturbed by seeing folks like SAM posting one-sided arguments. When there are plenty of people lining up against her, she doesn't need to be doing their job for them and helping argue for something she doesn't agree with. As far as SAM goes, two things make her stand out in my mind on this issue:

1) 60 000+ posts, great way to get noticed.
2) She has shown up on virtually every thread related to jews I've seen in recent memory, whether the topic is positive, negative or neutral, and her comments in these threads have pretty much been entirely negative as far as I can tell. And I should emphasize that it's threads on jews in general, not just Israel, and from what she's said in the past, my impression is she doesn't consider there to be a substantial distinction between the two.

Let me give you all a purely fictitious, hypothetical example of my concept here. Every time there's a new thread like "Kosher Pizza restaurant receives Gaston DeGuiganeau award for best pizza in France", if someone like SAM were to come along and say something snarky like "Bet they won't serve the ordinary gentile peasants" or "If only more kosher restaurants were based in France and less built on blood-soaked Palestinian homes", people are gonna start catching on after a while. Get it?
 
CptBork said:
Let me give you all a purely fictitious, hypothetical example of my concept here. Every time there's a new thread like "Kosher Pizza restaurant receives Gaston DeGuiganeau award for best pizza in France", if someone like SAM were to come along and say something snarky like "Bet they won't serve the ordinary gentile peasants" or "If only more kosher restaurants were based in France and less built on blood-soaked Palestinian homes", people are gonna start catching on after a while. Get it?
Click to expand...


unfortunately "a purely fictitious, hypothetical example" does not make the cut here.. sorry. i have standards to uphold

i am sure you will understand

/saddened
 
Well then why don't we come up with some kind of code word or something we can all write every time she does it, just so we can keep track? Maybe one of us can even write a script to parse everyone's posts and tally up the number of different threads where this code word is used. Would that satisfy this board of inquiry?
 
yeah
i was thinking something in the lines of...Sam's Hall of Shame in ATM

/giggle

james will never stand for that tho
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top