I think Ben is demonstrating what presenting both sides of an argument looks like. Or isn't anyone allowed to have more then one opinion on a topic?
James R: The S.A.M Issue
- Thread starter Gustav
- Start date
- Status
I think Ben is demonstrating what presenting both sides of an argument looks like. Or isn't anyone allowed to have more then one opinion on a topic?
go back and read. i have been pretty consistent
the players are irrelevant, the argument, not so
i examine erroneous conceptualizations and fallacious reasoning
it is what we do here in sci
however i shall allow your deflection. lets escalate the rhetoric
lets examine me
An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument to the person" or "argument against the person") is an argument which links the validity of a premise to a characteristic or belief of a person advocating the premise.
now that, dear james, is your forte
you? a supporter of sam?
/snicker
for the record, sam's interests are varied. i agree with her stance on some, others, no
but that a bit too nuanced a take for you, is it not?
taking that into consideration will of course only muddle, diminish and deflate the impact of the anticipated character assassination. ja?
Last edited:
Opinions, yes, followed by honest discourse. That's where you stop.
look at how they frame their arguments. rather than construct positive( trying to "win" the debate by making your argument the stronger) they rely on negative( trying to "win" the debate by making the other persons side be weaker)
well its nice for you to show your true colors and a fucking troll to all. maybe the mods won't be lazy and they'll ban your ass.
Appartently its easier for you to condemn rather than do research. I have never lied. But its nice to know a compulsive troll and flamer as yourseld deigned to have me as a target.
wanna start shit i'll throw down. I pay antention to peoples posting histories Q has a long history of muslim bashing so forgive me if i think his/her opinions in regards to me and same and the entire issue are shit.
I noticed that ( Q ) is here to fight and belittle people and not to debate issues according to his or her knowledge.....very sad and what a waste of time too !!!.
I get the fact that every time someone doesn't agree with your narrow-minded cult worldview, you consider it "Muslim bashing." Clearly, as sickening and pathetic as that is to read, it demonstrates well beyond a shadow of a doubt your reason for being here; Islamic propaganda. You all claim to be victimized but are merely hoisted by your own petards.
You have accused me of Muslim bashing in the past too! Or was it just being racist in general, I can't remember exactly.
That is why I don't even get involved in any of those topics anymore.
If I post a thread on Muslim Dad beheading a Toddler, I get accused of opening it ONLY to start trouble and bash Muslims.
You are not forgiven for lying as you will continue to lie to support your Islamic propagandist agenda.
I'm sure you'll find, as most do, that the Islamic propagandists on this forum will use that pathetic excuse on anyone and everyone who doesn't agree with their Islamic bigotry and delusions.
My knowledge indicates to me that you haven't a clue what you're talking about and resort to lies whenever you wish to support your delusions.
It would be nice if people didn't have to waste time on the propagandists that now plague this forum.
That's the admin's choice, though.
You have accused me of Muslim bashing in the past too! Or was it just being racist in general, I can't remember exactly.
That is why I don't even get involved in any of those topics anymore.
If I post a thread on Muslim Dad beheading a Toddler, I get accused of opening it ONLY to start trouble and bash Muslims.
Well when you post along the lines of the only reason they did an evil act is because their muslim with out looking for alternative explanations that is bashing them.
Thanks for demonstrating my point so succinctly. Well done! :bravo:
- Status